OC'd 3950x Appears on Geekbench! LN2?

[browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13669931

Attached: bandicam 2019-06-25 23-33-25-140.jpg (1072x1006, 122K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=L5Y-7oRG1sQ
browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13538458
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

that one poster with the screencap of his score with a 9900k btfo

nice

still with 2133 mhz RAM. how odd they would use that. bottleneck city

This
What the fuck were they thinking?

Geekbench shows the physical clock speed. Due to it being double data rate it would be advertised as 4266 MHz.

>kids these days don't even know how DDR RAM works

That's 4266 ram you tards.

Sad they had to use LN2, I'm only running with a NH-D15 never going over 80c.

Attached: fdfdf.jpg (856x816, 153K)

>Pulling 400niggerwatts i might add.

It literally has double your multi-core score

...

Double my score would be 70k, Seems to be lacking a bit even when under nitrogen. You might see a 5400 single thread score under normal circumstances. I have absolutely no need for anything over 16 threads at the moment and need strong single thread, Which a ryzen not on LN2 isn't up to.

They're even using insane 4266mhz ram so a 3200 kit is only going to make it considerably slower. Sorry you can keep your little babby cores.

>You might see a 5400 single thread score under normal circumstances

Are you retarded? The OC is only 10% over the stock single core boost, 4.7ghz. It would produce a 10% lower score

I guess you didn't take the godly sticks of ram into account, sorry but it loses.

They wouldn't need to use LN2 just for a bench like that

They literally said they used LN2

>imagine needing LN2 and 5.2 ghz to match a 9900k at 5ghz under air.

AMD remains an underperforming joke as usual.

It was posed as a question in the OP and 5.2Ghz doesn't seem extreme enough for LN2
I'd expect 5.8-6Ghz on LN2 as even first gen Ryzen gets 5.4

That was literally their max stable overclock

Where is the original source then?

youtube.com/watch?v=L5Y-7oRG1sQ

16gb, likely SR
It will score better with dual ranked, if it's anything like zen1/1+

>this faggot again

>THEY USED LN2 I'M SURE OF IT
COPE-A
COPE-A CABANA

Attached: 9400F vs 2700X.jpg (1926x947, 468K)

see You people just blindly come into these threads and act like a bunch of donkeys.

Intel 28 core on chilled water for comparison

browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13538458