browser.geekbench.com
Intel wins again lmao
browser.geekbench.com
Intel wins again lmao
still cheaper
cope
that single core performance is fucking appalling
It uses magical unicorn RAM as well so AMD is again BTFO
>amd single core score worse by 11 %
>amd multi core score better by 13 %
>amd price is lower by ~33 %
you'd be a moron to buy intel
>YES MY Supra beat your Corolla by 1ms
>the Ryzen 3000 is an AE86
>the Intel is a Civic Type-R
too bad really
though this IS geekbench
DOUBERU CRUSSHHHU!
real life results are similar
browser.geekbench.com
Why is the memory latency for AMD so bad?
>16384 MB DDR4 SDRAM 1065MHz
Because it's literally running DDR4 2133.
>only shows factory clock when tests may have been performed with an overclock
Why is this allowed?
Ccx trash
good catch
>2133MHz RAM
I'm not familiar with that web sight, what am I looking for and how is that related to OP's post?
>1800Mhz ram
Ok retard. Nice try tho, next time try using actually fast ram on both systems
every entry is numbered
you can compare two entries to eachother
when you check out the entry directly you can see more details such as actual clockspeeds at which the entry got its results
1800 x 2
no john you are the retards
Okay, I get it. The AMD processor was measured at its boost speed while the Intel processor was overclocked to 5 GHz.
And you guys said AMD was catching up to Intcel in single-core performance but they're still a decade behind
The wait for 7/7 is killing me, these leaked scores are all over the place.
lol
read the thread faggot
it has more than twice the L1 L2 and L3 cache, and this is going to be very relevant in terms of real world performance
>i'm not familiar with that web sight
>web sight
Is this Jow Forums or fucking /co/
INCELS ON SUICIDE WATCH
you mean AMD is like JDM enthusiast. People who like AMD care more about price/performance and delve more into the technical stuff.
Intel fanboys are Musclecar fags who just want pure Horsepower.
Is pure horsepower really that bad?
>7nm has worse IPC than 14nm+++ at the same frequency
Another disappointment from ayymd
>at the same frequency
See
>5.1 vs 4.2
>same frequency
>2133 mhz ram
based kikelord