What technology should be used to lower the carbon dioxide content in our atmosphere and stop climate change?

based guix poster

eugenics

This

I think it would take a lot of cars to equal this.
It's happening now.

Attached: Kuril Eruption.png (1901x1068, 2.13M)

>facts don't matter, only my conjecture
you'd fit right in at pol if you're not there already.

>the opposite political ideology of mine is stupid

President Trump says the Chinese invented global warming and I believe it. It's a lie to help them get ahead.

fpbp

The Ocean

It is, not because it's the opposite of mine, but because it's so easily scientifically disproven.

The natural cycle adds and removes CO2 to keep a balance; humans add extra CO2 without removing any.

skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm

Attached: Carbon_Cycle.gif (400x222, 12K)

Nuclear powered carbon capture machines that produce calcified carbon blocks

See
BTFO

>The natural cycle adds and removes CO2 to keep a balance
Not exactly. Passive emission is fine but if an ancient volcano could spew gasses straight into the upper atmosphere and it would be a pretty devastating addition.

But otherwise passive emission from volcanoes definitely don't emit more than human activity so unless Yellowstone blows we probably don't have to worry about volcanoes

Based and RBMK pilled

Which is why passive "solutions" like green energy are fraudulent. We should be pumping money into active climate control and luddites who scream about MUH MATRIX, MUH SNOWPIERCER should be lined up and shot along with anti-nuclear hippies.

>trying to get rid of natural population control

Attached: 1536682381966.jpg (216x346, 18K)

it might be easier to go the algae farm route.

>implying they won't mutate into Water World merman creatures and invade safe countries

There's a better path

I wonder if Gore was a false flag to get liberals to move the goalpost to "climate change" when they should really be concerned about ecological collapse.

Attached: 62978650989B45148FCA71D4818DB308.jpg (1024x543, 56K)

Volcanoes have been erupting for as long as we've had an atmosphere capable of holding greenhouse gases yet there has been no rapid temperature increase like what we're in the middle of right now.

The burning of the oil fields in Kuwait alone released more greenhouse gases than any volcano on record.

>create a problem where one doesn't exist
>distribute propaganda that changes people's reaction to unrelated phenomena
>offer the solution within an existing political framework, for a price
Stupid goys, they don't even realize.

Attached: 1549302454920.jpg (818x794, 173K)

it's funny that you think cars are the big issue

so how do we capture 12 carbon????

ever heard of tanker ships?

It's 12 gigatons.

>climate change
Climate change is a bit of a vague term, it could mean an Ice Age, Global Warming or any number of things. Say what you actually mean or else you come across as a bullshitter.

big eruptions have cooling effects, dipshit
there are historical records of this
they pump the atmosphere full of special aerosol molecules that reflect sun rays, most geoengineering techniques actually try to emulate what volcanoes do
you'd know this if you actually read the literature compiled by the entire scientific community instead of trying to be an armchair climatologist and throw random guesses around

Unironically this, why isnt China running purely on nuclear is the question

carbon tax

They have the most nuclear plants on construction and planned in the world. They started years ago. In fact I think the rest of the world combined has less planmed reactors.
Heard the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and the trade war affected their construction a bit, but tge budgets were mostly all allocated already. If not for climate change, it's probably to address the fact they have to import millions of tons of oil and the people living in their cities die 20 years ealier due to pulmonary issues

0.038%? That's not much, what gives?

literally this

Carbon Capture

Carbon as a solid is really useful, we just need to trap all those gasses and turn them into useful materials.

>nuke india
Problem solved.

>have to drink 10 gallons of water to kys
>takes only a few milligrams of poison to kill a full grown man

>nuke india
>when europe and north america have been pumping the atmosphere full of CO2 since the industrial revolution

I just remembered that Yellowstone could blow up literally any time and pretty much destroy civiliation.

Plastic pollution is far more nefarious.
India is a giant garbage bin, even if we stop sending our trash there, they waste so much the problem still exists.

Plastic pollution might be a serious thing, but isn't what's causing climate change, silly

BP sponsored Eco(tm) clean power technologies for use in the future.

FPBP, based.
Heck we could even use them in conjunction with carbon-capture tech to make synfuels (since petroleum products still have a much higher energy density than any battery - orders of magnitude) and that way just close another loop in the carbon cycle.

We're technically still in that cooling period, it's just that we pumped so much GHGs into the atmosphere that we fucked that up, so, imagine what'll happen when it swings back.

once you have that much extra power electrc vehicles also start being more appealing
the average persons daily commute rarely goes above what battery range can give you

Attached: Car-Costs.jpg (1190x656, 159K)

True, but it won't work for all of the transportation industry, think bigger, we're talking about planes, ships, trains, freight trucks...etc

can't argue with that

Attached: 1558632429847.gif (400x285, 1.87M)

Ovens