if games could use more than 4 cores then don't you think they would have made a fair few of them between 2015-2019?
If games could use more than 4 cores then don't you think they would have made a fair few of them between 2015-2019?
Hunter Gray
Other urls found in this thread:
guru3d.com
twitter.com
Asher Ward
Yes, and they did.
Brody Smith
try running metro exodus on an old 4 core i5
Brody Sanders
Good luck running PUBG or Mordhau @ high refresh rates and smooth frames with a 4 core. Both of them stretch my 6c/12t 1600
Carter Ortiz
ez
Asher Hernandez
Video games are for children.
Colton Adams
easy
Ryder Russell
but most people don't stop playing games until they hit 25 or so
Jace Thomas
>have 4c/4t CPU
>constant stutters and poor performance in new games
THANK YOU BASED INTEL
Charles Taylor
You mean 3+3 core? 3+3/6+6?
Matthew Turner
AYMD absolutely BTFO
Lucas Reyes
Go back to your containment board, manchild.
Isaac Murphy
you a big boi fixing your arch xorg.conf
Ryan Cruz
CPUs should only have one super fast core. Anything embarrassingly parallel should be offloaded to the GPU.
Prove me wrong.
Julian Baker
GPU parallelization is only good for certain things.
Jaxon Turner
>if games
Reported.
Ayden Campbell
Farcry 5/ND
Metro Exodus
Rage 2
Satisfactory
R6 Siege
those are a few select recent games that use a fair bit of cpu,
but even when you dont run games that use alot of CPU more cores is nice
on my 1600 and now 1700 i can play games, watch youtube/twitch on the side, download/torrent shit in the background and more
w/o ever having to worry about running into a wall in terms of cores or ram (32gb 3000mhz)
Wyatt Nelson
what are you on about?
FX was 2/4 3/6 or 4/8
but Zen is 4/4 4/8 6/12 or 8/16 (soon 12/24 & 16/32)
[Cores/threads]
Andrew Clark
>posts an infinitely more powerful i7 benchmark
Xavier Rogers
>nah its not an i7 bench
you are correct, its an i9 benchmark where they disabled cores but not hyperthreading