a fucking $650 intlol btfo by a $200 mid range ryzen
A fucking $650 intlol btfo by a $200 mid range ryzen
Other urls found in this thread:
amd.com
twitter.com
please do the needful and delete sir.
i have 12 children to feed.
...at what clock though? Base or turbo? It clearly states intel scores are @ base clock so why does it omit Ryzen clock? The specs are known so the only reason it's not shown is that it was not benched @ base clock.
>9900KF @ 3.6GHz
>9900K @ 3.6GHz
>3.6GHz
>3.6GHz
>3.6GHz
>LN2
discarded test
I was about to post about the 3700x beating it but that's just sad
Stay mad Intel shill
It shows the baseclock for amd systems too you fucking retard.
>It clearly states intel scores are @ base clock
No it doesn't.
It's just that the person who made Passmark is indian and doesn't understand what turbo is so he just lists the base clock.
The scores are user submissions at varying clocks. Some are stock, some are OCed, etc., and it averages out.
The people spamming like are just more retards trying to deflect from the fact that Intel is BTFO.
>accuse every single benchmark of being LN2
mfw AMD has found a way to run all ryzen 3000s on perpetual LN2 by default
CPUs don't matter
>3600
>mid range
I have news for you
Holy fucking shit!
The only way you can make me switch is if it has an Intel rapid storage technology equivalent. That would be the Intel killer for me.
>DURR, ALL NIGGERHURTZ ARE EQUAL
whoa, how tf is this even possible
># of Samples
>3
This is how
Only works on certain boards, and not on laptops. Damn. I was so close to switching. Thanks for bringing this to my attention though user. I'll keep an eye out.
>there are people who genuinely, truly, wholeheartedly, bought an i9
no problem
9900k was a fucking scam and we tried to warn people.
>anything right after Sandy was a scam and we tried to warn them
>Niche case user
NOBODY CARES
4790k was good. 5775C was great. But that was before all the security vulns. Now they're trash, too.