Mfw a ryzen 5 that uses half the power and costs half as much as an i9 beats it in single core performance

>mfw a ryzen 5 that uses half the power and costs half as much as an i9 beats it in single core performance

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: incel btfo.png (636x70, 8K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600/4031vs4040
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9400-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m735306vs3956
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

intelcucks blown the fuck out
inb4 far cry benchmarks and outdated BIOS versions

>s-single core performance doesn't matter goy!

noOoOooOoooOoOooOoooOoOooOoo

Attached: 1544667387109.png (813x1402, 324K)

>b-b-but muh mobo chipset fan
We don't know if it will even go over 30% speed at full load, it's overbuilt
>x570 is 'spensive!
no, it's just more expensive compare to the great prices of past amd motherboards. plus zen 2 is compatible with past chipsets
>but le high speed ram meme
hahahaha, no
>but le LATENCIA
poor dude has to spam that dumbass graph 24/7 to afford living expenses, i honestly feel bad

>poor shitter shill STILL at it

dry your tears
I'm sure the latencysperg will wake up any minute now
he'll back you up spamming the same meaningless picture over and over

And gets annihilated in multicore. Everything that's single core will be computed too fast to notice whereas multicore really matters.

6c/12t beats 8c/8t in multicore, dummy

>single core doesn't matter
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
IF SINGLE CORE DIDNT MATTER AND MULTICORE WAS EVERYTHING THEN RYZEN WOULD BE BEATING INTEL SINCE 2017

>userbenchmarks
in the trash it goes

>>but le LATENCIA
Does that even matter if it simply outperforms Intel in every task, though? Like, why are people clinging onto that chart so hard? It makes no sense. If anything, it makes Zen 2 even more impressive, since there's clear room for improvement. Intel, on the other hand, have 14nm completely tapped out with nowhere to go besides adding cores at the expense of yields and profitability/cost.

I think you should calm down actually

Cpubenchmarks.
Userbenchmarks is another website.
User benchmarks is a category of benchmarks.

That's pissmark and it's Intel benchmark.

>six AMD cores beats eight Intel cores in a multicore benchmark
Man I'd really hate to be an Intel fanboy right now

>what is hyperthreading/smt

is this what full cope looks like?

how about you go and look how a 9700 competes versus an 8700k

Intel is objectively superior, AMDrone

Attached: benchmark.png (476x415, 25K)

>quads
The eternal question Intel would like to know the answer to

yes the 8700k beats the 9700k in multicore

cinebench, sure

>flagship thread ripper can't even beat some random mobile i7
No one can compete with a 9980XE

Single core performance is irrelevant in the real world.

yes it can and its called ryzen 9 3950x

whoosh

Jow Forumswoosh

is this why AMD has been dominating the market since bulldozer?

>in opposite world

are you saying the only thing that was shit about bulldozer was the single core performance?

joke


your head

It's funny, Intlel shills are so used to getting jewed every CPU generation, they really believe you need X570 to use Ryzen 3000 CPUs.

Oops, looks like someone doesn't understand how computers work.

Who cares about single thread performance

Attached: 1562005495527.jpg (711x457, 63K)

Oh boy its another retarded flamewar thread. Seriously Intel and AMD fanboys are pure cancer

Multi thread performance doesn't matter either

Attached: 1558971971271.jpg (2053x1025, 137K)

cringe yikes havesex dilate

t. VIA fanboy

Jow Forums is now Jow Forumsbrandwars

>now

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fuck dude

still haven't calmed down?

lmao

>literally 6,030 SKU numbers worse
Imagine having less than half the processor?

>muh single thread
>muh multi core
do amdrones really spend all day looking at scores and benchmarking?
intel has netflix 4k
nuff said

Just random graphs, show me thousands of benchmarks on popular websites to confirm this wild rumor.

The absolute city of shitel

GOYIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Attached: mysterious abstract artwork.jpg (3000x3672, 2.11M)

>Just random graphs (71687793)
Look again and r/woosh

Attached: 1515101219256.png (356x480, 6K)

Performance doesn't matter I buy my computer chips based on brand!

Attached: intel.png (607x895, 126K)

Should I get this to replace my 6700k

Attached: 1559941036199.png (371x397, 177K)

>comparing a fucking consumer electronic to Rolex watchfags

This ..... Is the power.... Of judaism

intel is the rolex of CPUs and you poor fucks just cant afford it

Jesus, even Francois has run out of objective arguments for Intel product offerings against AMD with that Rolex analogy.

Attached: 1560524016573.png (603x224, 20K)

I bet he is an Appel fan too.

processors aren't fashion products you actual faggot
you cant even see your cpu inside your pc so why bother with overpriced brands that give you inferior performance?

this. I will always buy intel due to superior social status

intel is a poorfag brand kiddo

Because some people are mentally ill. Not joking.

buy intel sir ples

How much INTELâ„¢ paying him?

three fiddy

implying those shills didnt do it for free

Top Kek

>comparing quartz watches with mechanical watches

Imagine doing it for free.

KEK

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-3600/4031vs4040

Good. It's about time to refresh my hardware and I'll be happy to not pay Intel prices.

nobody outside of Jow Forums buys poozens

Attached: file.png (1642x564, 84K)

>X570 is expensive

Attached: AEC77A6A-2EAA-432D-AFB4-3F8D3EA26985.png (1242x2688, 1.34M)

NOOOOO INTELBROS WE WUZ KANGZ

>poozen has 0% marketshare

Attached: 1551463170851.jpg (460x288, 25K)

Is he saying that AMD is actually the right choice but the consumers choose inferior Intel products because of brand recognition?

>Ryzen 5 3600
>Market Share 0%
OH NO NO NO
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: gkek.jpg (5000x5000, 1.76M)

No surprise here, Intel fanboys are literally mentally ill.

Attached: 1545672612521.jpg (400x600, 188K)

Yeah, Piednoel will finally lose it when his INTC shares plunge below the initial value. Then it will be over for him.

>intel is unironically dying
It was just a prank

Attached: z1anff6g63x01.jpg (540x540, 14K)

THE ABSOLUTE CITY OF SHITEL

cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-9400-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600X/m735306vs3956

Not unlike most purchases people make. People with don't want to or don't have time to do thorough research on every thing they buy. Hardly anyone is going to read into or understand the low level differences between current CPUs and make an informed decision. They'll trust the consensus or marketing instead because it's easier.

People do the same with buying cars. Few buyers know why a Honda or Toyota is considered to be more reliable and efficient at a mechanical level, but trust public opinion to tell them so without details.

Paying extra for a known brand makes these people comfortable in assuming they're not buying garbage, even if they are.

Are you joking or just actually brain dead?

Ahaha AMDrones blown the fuck out. Imagine losing this badly with Server Grade chips losing to mobile phone chips ahahaha

A rolex doesn't suddenly go out of date when it's competitor tells the time faster.

Calling bullshit. They only (barely) beat haswell with zen. Something fucky is going on.

NO
*squats*
STOP LYING
*shits on street*
SHUT THE FUCK UP

INB4 Latency poster

that's what ford said before Toyota assraped them anew.

But they barely beat Haswell with Coffeelake?

coffee lake = haswell ipc

INTC can barrow at near 0% and buy their own shares to keep their stock up.
Just look at IBM they haven't built anything in 30 years.

This is always the case, I'm an AMD fanboy but Intel always releases some monstrosity that blows everything out of the water and costs an arm and a leg.

A bit later AMD will release something that is on par/out performs it and is cheap.

Once this cycle completes Intel will release another monstrosity.

Why

depends what you use it for.

Next time include some ARM SKUs

Gaymen

But then the intel cpu is better because you amd shills have been saying that multicore is where it's at since faildozer.

Well, what is it?