Ryzen 5 3600

Do you think this is anywhere near real or true?

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-04 at 04.31.36.png (2216x1216, 564K)

Other urls found in this thread:

newegg.com/gigabyte-aorus-2-tb/p/N82E16820009013
newegg.com/patriot-16gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820225142?Item=N82E16820225142
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>[email protected]
Yeah.

1st u cant read
2nd 3.1 is the stock clock
3rd kys

Post real benchmarks famalam

Attached: benchmark.png (476x415, 25K)

We'll know for sure in a few days.
I'm thinking not though. Not like that will prevent me from going Ryzen anyway.

AMDFAGS BTFO

Learn to read. The 9900 non-k stock clock is 3.1 and cannot be overclocked.

In ultra synthetic benchmarks? Possibly

In the real world? Nope

>u
nigger

It has double the l3 cache as a 9900k. That should give it a huge bump in games.

Riddle me this user. How does a 9900 that runs at 3.1ghz outperform a 9900k that runs at 3.6ghz?

>How
Jewish trickery

>3 days later...

yes

Attached: file.png (961x727, 173K)

It's possible but i'm going to keep my expectations low because AMD shit has a tendency to get way over hyped pre release.

So far according to all leaks it should be more or less true.
But until I see some real world benchmarks I'm not going to believe it.
I mean there are some leaks out there which if scaled linearly to higher GHz, would put the stock 3950x like 15% ahead of 9900k @ 5.2GHz in single core. No way in hell can that be true.
I'm expecting AMD to evenly trade blows with Intel or slightly beat them in the best case scenario in SC. I have a feeling that AMD simply does extremely well in synthetics for some reason, but the performance is a lot less dramatic in real life.

It's fake, goyim, patch it

Not sure. Here's an image I was gonna post to that retarded thread comparing different graphics cards and mobos tho.

Attached: Untitled.png (980x2184, 113K)

I also wanted to post that the SSD of the AMD system is a new PCIe 4.0 SSD that hits 5 GB/s - it should be faster than the Samsung SSD 970 pro.

newegg.com/gigabyte-aorus-2-tb/p/N82E16820009013

>twice the price
>5%
THE ABSOLUTE STATE
3900X is going to pulverize that pozzed housefire trash.

thats a "65w" tdp processor vs a "130w" tdp processor, lower tdp means more time spend on turbo instead of thermal throttling back to stock.
its not rocket science

oh and also
>Thermal Velocity Boost
which effectively auto-overclocks the cpu, which only the non-k version seems to support (if you believe intel)

more like three times the price
forgot you need biggest radiator in world to keep it under 95C lol

correct

I think the new ryzen chips are gonna be great, but some of you are in for major disappointment. Getting your hopes way too high

Attached: 1561400060404.jpg (718x379, 102K)

>80% of performance for 40% the price
You're not helping.

this is racist to indians please remove sir

NOOOOOOOOOOOO INTELBROS WE NEED TO COME UP WITH NEW PROPAGANDA RAM PRICES ARE TOO LOW

newegg.com/patriot-16gb-288-pin-ddr4-sdram/p/N82E16820225142?Item=N82E16820225142

Attached: 1544667387109.png (813x1402, 324K)

It's on the level of a 6700k. Not very impressive

I'd love it to be true, but really if the cheapo models are that good what the hell is the high end stuff going to be?

Chinese will take over, coming soon....

The 9900K is barely faster than a 6700K. Not very impressive.

Attached: 1561729020219.jpg (755x561, 58K)

Pretty sure those are suicide rates

just wait till sunday, only 3 days left either way

god intel is such a diseased garbage company

why would the r5 3600 outperform the r7 3700x
retards

3700X - 4.4GHz at stock
3600 OC'd hard - 4.5GHz

Maybe

are we looking at the same chart?

OH NONONONO AHAHAHHAHAAAAHAHAHAAHH

Attached: AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-X570-Juegos-4.jpg (718x379, 133K)

lol, at a fraction of the price and that's despite shit ram.

I don't know, Pajeet. Are we?

Remember these tests were done with 2080ti (at least that's what they said on their site) and some games can't even reach 90 fps.

Attached: AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-X570-Juegos-1.jpg (718x379, 104K)

...

it'll do well in synthetics and be well behind the fastest intel chips in gaymen, which is the whole reason for zen 2 to exist. if you have a ryzen or zen+ keep it and save yourself money/disappointment or buy zen 2 and continue the amdcope cycle.

Considering how weak 9900k is, that's not too surprising. It can't even stream, 1.6 FPS is atrocious. As usual, people will keep buying Ryzen and Intel products will get outsold really hard due to inferior architecture.

Attached: 3900x02-720x720.jpg (720x393, 33K)

that is an average, my 2700x paired with a radeon vii can't keep to 60 in actual gameplay (tested at 1080p).

Attached: 1545672612521.jpg (400x600, 188K)

This. Not to mention 9900k's true competitor 3900X has pretty much annihilated Intel's best.

Attached: amd_ryzen_3000_horizon_next_e3_2019_016.jpg (2040x1148, 319K)

Attached: 1561563554391.png (898x882, 108K)

POST FARCRY AGAIN! IT'S ALL WE HAVE LEFT!

I'm under NDA but whatever. Can confirm that the 3600 beats i9 at base and it can oc a lot higher.

you seem upset bruh

oof

Attached: hi.png (3840x2160, 3.92M)

jesus christ...

amd claimed zen 2 11% faster in gta v. this is what that gets you.

Attached: underwhelming.png (3840x2160, 2.76M)

The absolute state of intel pozzed housefires

Attached: 1528292848450.jpg (811x1024, 223K)

And CSGO...oh wait

Attached: 1561660206291.png (1033x767, 1.01M)

how's gta v even a valid benchmark?

Intel sponsored benchmark.

Attached: 1562177942939.jpg (880x585, 71K)

The passmark score is too high but that doesn't matter because no one should look at passmark scores

Friendly reminder gaymersnexus has been exposed multiple times as a faggot shill.

Attached: GTAV.png (1314x1192, 53K)

what? it has a bench built in to the game. the point being in games where ryzen struggles the most compared to intel zen 2 isn't going to do a lot for you.

Attached: intel-i7-9700K-f1-2018-1080p.png (981x855, 126K)

Too bad gaymersnexus is a faggot intel shill. 2700x can easily get a lot more than (((90 fps)))

Attached: gVbkupe.png (1920x1080, 1.39M)

Im upgrading from ryzen 2600x to 3600x or 3700 and no one can stop me

>the same graphs shows the Zen + being bested by a Zen2 in single core performance.

>in fact, the Zen+ chip in your same Far Cry Benchmark is losing to, and even winning against a 6700K.

How's that delusion field standing up. I wonder which goalpost you will move to, once the truth is revealed.

>I will base my opinions on a totally fair and impartial chart that amd marketing released

the funny thing is that HWU is now being called an AMD shill, despite these idiots championing them for BTFO'ing AdoredTV

Best way to piss off AMDrones: post benchmarks

he's an egocentric faggot for sure but his numbers generally line up with my own experience using a 2700x, more so than that aussie prat whose numbers are questionable and are often gpu limited.

>If I post benchmarks made in 2018, they'll be the same after optimizations and newer versions of games.

Also:
>1080p low settings
>when everyone now plays at 1440p

He's a retarded faggot and A LOT more people get way higher numbers than what that shill gets in GTA V

Attached: Untitled.png (1018x615, 1.15M)

Shut the fuck up.

>MUH GPU BOTTLENECK.

That's kind of the point. Also, as proven by the 7600K vs 1600, AMD's offerings don't scale linearly with GPU's

interesting. i'll pick up a copy and see for myself, best way to know tbqh.

that's because the benchmark is different from running the game. Most of these reviewers are company fuckboys who just shill products, and never objectively provide objective benchmarks regarding the market-segment. FFS they test R3's and i3's on 1080Ti's

Shut up goy

>everyone on the planet is wrong and gaymensnexus is right
A few more stumbles and his channel will lose all credibility and close really soon.

Real credibility is calling a spade a spade. It's hilarious that people now call Hardware Unboxed an AMD shill, despite being in the forefront of those who questioned AdoredTV's leaks, just because he called it right that the 1600, once better optimized will be a better buy than the 7600K.

LN2 && || AVX256 heavy test

This is the funny thing. Latencyguy may not realize it, but even in their own memo's intel is fearing that once developers optimize for AMD's architecture, the issues that originally plagued the platform will be gone.

i want to know what ram was being used, unless i'm blind i can't see it on that

Attached: chimp.jpg (478x478, 31K)

Quotes his own gibberish post to make it look like he said something intelligent.

(Higher is better)

2700x goes all way past 250W-300W, like a choochoo in Buildzoid videos.
MCE Off Intel will stay 95W

I remember the video where he did his retests and AMDrones were seething that Intel still dominates most of the gaming benchmarks.

>but then you need to overclock shit.

You do realize Steve and Tim are two different people right?

>doesn't realize that Steve BTFO'd AdoredTV in another incident.

Suure.

But HardwareUnboxed are unabashed AMD shills.

They literally go out of their way to shit on Intel and sometimes he shits on Nvidia too.

His 7th gen versus 1st gen Ryzen revisit videos is just him catering to his mostly AMD-heavy Patreon backers. Intel shills and normal viewers called him out and he made a butthurt video on how he """isn't""" an AMD shill.

He's the only tech reviewer to actually own and use AMD products and the only tech reviewer who got sidestepped by Intel and most recently Nvidia, gee I wonder why.

This Hardwareunboxed sounds pretty antisemitic...

You fucking realize that he got called out by Jim because he tested the 1st Gen Ryzens "incorrectly".

Like I said, Inturds were championing them when they BTFO'd Jim. But because they came up with the 7th gen Core vs 1st gen Ryzen revisit, you have turned against them

HardwareUnboxed = confirmed nazis.

Attached: 02776a2ba515d247cc243de3145ce0f6.gif (300x200, 419K)

pretty much sounds like the Inturds will turn against every Benchmark Youtuber, once 7/7 happens.

in his 2600 vs 9400 video intel got faster in every game except AC, he still say "amd better choice"
just let him unbox shit

If you're anti-Intel you're a literal Nazi.

>have every advantage except gaming
>can upgrade into better SKU come 7/7
>games for PS5/Scarlett are optimized for 8c/16t
The i5 is dead, what happened with the 7600K is going to happen again to the 9400F

There's nothing wrong if he flat out says he likes AMD.

No one hates Linus when he says he's sponsored by Intel.

It's called transparency, everyone can root for their favorite corporation.

I don't understand all the arguing. Even if Intel is better performance-wise, they're still broken by design with regards to security, so AMD automatically wins by default anyway.