Is it dying? Recent changes page used to have far more edits per minute years ago. Do you think people using phones has ultimately destroyed contributing detailed information to the web?
Is it dying? Recent changes page used to have far more edits per minute years ago...
Grayson Morales
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Julian Rivera
Nope
Jason Butler
As it fills up the edits will decline obviously.
Lincoln Gomez
who cares what phonetards do? there will always be the undying subset of pctards that'll keep doing what they've always done, years before phones were allowed on the internet. in fact, it'll be closer to what it once was if your question turns out to be true, better for everyone involved.
Cooper Powell
Phone poster.
Asher Ramirez
I use wikipedia on my phone
Gabriel Richardson
Most of the human knowledge has been stored on Wikipedia. There's not much else to add.
Asher Taylor
>she doesn't know about the behind the scenes 7 admin resignation drama
Nolan White
>Hunan knowledge
I wished they would share facts instead.
Hudson Myers
>Is it dying?
Lets hope so. Wikipedo is not a good or useful site. Politics and history topics on wikipedo is fucking atrocious. Science is a tiny bit better, but not by much. The only thing it's really good at is celebrity trivia and shit like that. First thing my professor told me was "never trust fucking wikipedia." Best advice I've ever gotten. Wikipedo usage leads to plebbitorism, which in turn may lead to more serious conditions like "I fucking love science" or "pickle rick."
Lincoln Howard
>888
checked
But you're wrong though
Leo Morales
>recent changes is a bit slower than before
>iS iT dYiNg?!?!?!?
Consider fucking hanging yourself.
Ryder Jackson
It might be that other languages of Wikipedia have more widespread use. German Wikipedia is interesting and well kept while still staying very technical. Spanish Wikipedia might have more edits today than in any time before.
Jason Bennett
Wrong about what? Wikipedo being a CIA nigger scum pit for propaganda and pseudoscience? I don't think so.
Ethan Green
This is a good thing
Michael Carter
Its full, fuck off
Liam Adams
>Do you think people using phones has ultimately destroyed contributing detailed information to the web?
no connection, they have an app too...
Juan Bennett
My biggest issue with Wikipedia is that news articles and twitter posts are seen as valid sources.
Owen Sanchez
Yes it is, the admins are currently mass resigning due to Fram, one of the more abusive users getting banned.
en.wikipedia.org
They are also closing more of the articles to outsiders with less than 500 edits on topics such as Israel.
Eli Hernandez
My professors cite Wikipedia on small trivial nonsense or scientific stuff that's common knowledge like the fact that rubisco is the enzyme used in photosynthesis and shit like that.
Charles Watson
>They are also closing more of the articles to outsiders with less than 500 edits on topics such as Israel.
Haha, wikipedos btfo.
Jackson King
Says a lot about today's academia.
Lincoln Ward
That makes me glad. Human knowledge will always exist to an extent now and it's free to everyone. Isn't it great?
Daniel Williams
some of that "knowledge" got deleted because it's antisemitic !
Adrian Sullivan
Chase Cooper
I wonder if the politically correct blogs they so often accept as source material are peer-reviewed.
Ayden Myers
>Most of the human knowledge has been stored on Wikipedia.
Doubtful.