>install icecat
>87 captchas
>”uh-oh nigger. Looks like you fucked up! Start all over again.”
>98 captchas
>...
>BLOCKED by Google for posting without giving up my ass and personal information to them first
It astounds me how anyone can shill for this company and not call themselves a self-flogging cunt
How can I get around Google’s bullying?
Just buy a pass poorfag
The level of cucked in your post
Use the NoScript captcha
>implying that doing 98 captchas just to get blocked isn't literal cuckoldry
>paying to post on this piece of shit site
Same problem with current firefox, it's not icecat.
How?
still being a google employee that does it for free
>#
>How?
>be Jow Forums
>don't know how to noscript captcha
I swear, /v/ at this point is more technologically savvy.
you guise did something fucky with the captchas. It's awful for the last 2 days.
plis no bully, I bear gifts. epic screenshots and stuff.
Kuroba doesn't have this problem ;^)
Noscript captcha requires disabling a lot of browser security features as well, otherwise it fails to load. Being able to do the noscript captcha is proof of tech-illiteracy.
google doesn't like being blocked, and they're holding the internet hostage to get around it. Do a before and after of reCaptcha with a whitelisted google.com in your adblocker.
or use this site to get an idea if google thinks you're human.
>requires disabling a lot of browser security features
name 2
Canvas fingerprinting and referer headers. If you have either of these "disabled" it doesn't work at all.
>Canvas fingerprinting
that's a privacy feature
>referer headers
more of a privacy feature as well
those aren't security related
lmao
Werks on my machine
>privacy isn't security
Learn the difference. IT is a technical field.
us.norton.com
Correct
There are extensions that will play and defeat the audio captcha automatically.
He was making fun of your incorrectness. The overlap is sufficient to consider them the same for these common concerns.
security and privacy are 2 different things
user said security when in fact he provided privacy settings
Read the post
I did and you are a retard that thinks it's ok to refer to privacy and security as the same thing
are you retarded
Why would he be?
>How can I get around Google’s bullying?
Gee, maybe if you fucking morons hadn't posted bullshit, we wouldn't be where we are today
>(You) are the reason why we can't ever have nice things
>moving the goalpost this hard
Nice opinions, too. Tech-illiteracy proven.
see
ITT: Jow Forums techlets are so utterly desperate to punch down on other techlets that they make complete fools of themselves
>How
4chanx
Retard here, is this good or not
"score": 0.1,
"action": "examples/v3scores",
"error-codes": [
"score-threshold-not-met"
Browser settings aren't placed under catagories of privacy or security. Depending on their use case for the end user, they could apply to both categories. Stay mad goalpost mover.
You are wrong. Plain and simple. They are not the same thing.
Those setting don't affect the security of the browser though
no, that's the bad goy score on the level of spambots
once v3 becomes popular everyone that uses adblockers and privacy settings/addons is going to be banned from the internet since website owners can set a minimum v3 score to use their site
>Being able to do the noscript captcha is proof of tech-illiteracy.
Being able to do and doing them are different
I know you're butthurt, but you don't have to be so obvious about it.
Is this any better? It seems I have to solve it 10 or more times before it lets me post
{
"success": true,
"hostname": "recaptcha-demo.appspot.com",
"challenge_ts": "2019-07-05T01:51:43Z",
"apk_package_name": null,
"score": 0.7,
"action": "examples/v3scores",
"error-codes": []
}
You quoted the wrong person.
They very well could, you don't know what I know or the reasons I use them. Good job keeping this goalpost moved, you're still a tech-illiterate for being able to use the noscript captcha.
You have to have certain features/settings enabled in your browser to use the noscript captcha. If you're technically-iterate, you shouldn't be able to use the noscript captcha. Stay mad.
>They very well could
I know that they don't
Captcha has become fucking RIDICULOUS. It was just fine couple of days ago, but jewgle decided to crank it up to 11, especially for non-kosher browser (hello my fellow Brave-Waterfox niggers).
I have to disable uBlock Origin on sites that use reCaptcha
But what's funnier is that if I'm logged in my jewgle account, captcha just tells me to fuck off every time without a fail. Looks like I've been a very bad goy.
Works fine here
t. W10 and Firefox user
>solving 185 captchas only to be told to fuck off
Just cough up the 20 shekels for a pass already
Change the useragent string
> he doesn't use a real browser
> what is Jow Forums-x with force disable javascript captchas?
how are you this fucking retarded?
speaking of retards..
okay now every captcha is returning wrong solve error. wtf.
this was a test.
FIX THIS CAPTCHA SHIT. YOU MORONS ARE DOING IT WRONG.
>Tranny college fag makes up arbitrary ethical distinction between "security" and "privacy"
>Autistic retards call it "tecnical" and school others in it because they read it on wikipedia/jewish school book
Privacy is security, imbeciles. The security of avoiding personal information leaks. Identity under the form of data is still data. Keeping your data secure is privacy.
>training google's skynet to own moot epic style
Wrong. I'm going to trust the articles written with creditable people who say otherwise and not trust you (some random user).