>AMD 12 cores beat Intel 18 cores
lol
AMD 12 cores beat Intel 18 cores
Other urls found in this thread:
doesn't beat the 9980xe though lol, intel still kangz n sheit
>top CPU is still ryzen
YIKES
Rendering doesn't matter because it's antisemitic
Passmark doesn't matter either because it NEEDS PATCHING
>what is price category
I like how 3900X competes with $1500+ CPUs
CPUs don't matter
Do these benchmarks include Intel (((security))) patches?
shut up goy
Security patches have barely any impact on raw performance for something like handbrake, it mostly gimps networking and io performance.
Tomorrow we'll have the final solu- *cough* results.
kek
|
|>
|
|3
|
|
>102ns memory latency
How can amd compete in (current year)?
By not being pozzed.
>lol it doesn't beat a $2000 cpu!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOO
*crying wojak*
How did zen2 get such huge gains in 3d rendering? An overclocked 16 core one is going to be close to the 32c threadripper. Was it mainly the FPU changes?
2X FPU, 2X cache, +15% IPC
psshh, nothin personnel, kid, but you haven't seen true power yet
except cinebench r15 HEAVILY favors AMD
Based
Except Cinebench is Intel benchmark.
>tfw AMD put that huge cache in just to look better in benchmarks
Cachelet
>cache doesn't help except in benchmarks
IT'S NOT FAIR
*seething wojak*
>performs worse
>"beats"
amdrones are in another level of delusion
beats it in R20 too which favours Intel cause AVX
It is beating an 7980xe which is a 18 core SkylakeX behemoth with 165W TDP
LOL
sirs pls let us be reason and support Intel they are simply the best
nice! heh, it looks ok but I was expecting a lot better,I guess we should wait for zen3 lol
*seething Intel wojak wearing smirking AMD wojak mask*
yes sirs intel good blue buy intel
Is the 9980XE really that much better than the 7980XE? I thought they were completely on par with each other.
>2x FPU
I'm pretty sure R15 doesn't use AVX2.
what the fuck is a "gaming CPU"
a CPU with game cash of course
errr.... sweatie.... ur cpu has gamecache doesn't it??
BASED AMD inventing gaymurr cache Intards BTFOREVER
The RAM speed is completely different? Nice balanced benchmark lol. Welp looking forward to a full AMD system next year.
"it just works"
WTF AMD
lmao @ an AMD Product captioned with "it just works."
>undervolt so your gpu doesn't throttle out of the box
>buy this $70 heatsink to upgrade your POS reference blower
>new games don't work properly until a driver update
>muh finewine
>10,000 AGESA updates for system stability
>memory training on every restart
>make sure you get expensive b-die ram so you can actually boot at half decent memory speeds
This is outdated, there's a 3700X up there now too
>AMD 12 core beats AMD 16 core
Your point?
b-but IT BEATS INTEL
What even is your point
and its restricted alright
>manages to beat an outdated 18 core cpu that runs at 2.6Ghz with their brand new 12 core running at 3.8
>in multithreaded, still only wins by a single point
The absolute state of AMD fanboys
>manages to beat an outdated 18 core cpu that runs at 2.6Ghz with their brand new 12 core running at 3.8
>in multithreaded, still only wins by a single point
>The absolute state of AMD fanboys
>looks at ram
yep
Who the fuck runs their 9980XE at 3.0GHz? I surely don't.
Also AMD needs to bring that 64 core TR out already, I need a new PC.
Retard
Handbreak doesn't count
NO GOYIM
Intel shills on suicide watch
youtube.com
>lol it beats a 2 year old CPU!
Gib mal bitte den Link zum Benchmark rĂ¼ber.
jews live rent free inside your guys' heads lol
>3900x wins in asscreed
How? Not surprised with Wolfenstein 2, that engine is actually pretty optimized, you can easily get around 200 fps already.
OY VEY
Then why not test with the patches?
>lol intel hasn't come up with anything new in 10 years
>Price doesn't matter
You're trying to hard.
Prices are easy to adjust.
What if Intel decides to lower prices to AMD's level?
Is AMD somehow going to pull an extra 50% performance per hz out of it's ass?
They can just price even lower the way they make chips is cheaper than intels monolithic die. I hope this happens better for us.
Before that Intel have to figure out chiplet design.
Making monolithic 18-core dies is expensive.
>Intel decides to lower prices
kek
[HAND RUBBING INTENSIFIES]
[Hebraic screeching]
check'd
>Before that Intel have to figure out chiplet design.
In 2030
but will amd still use way more power than my intel?
>not using the same ram for each
Because we need those Intelbux
>90 watts for 10% less performance vs 211 watt housefire
>$339 vs $479
Intel is dead.
Correction.
10% less overall performance in gaming while beating or it in productivity. Who cares?
>BUT MUH GAMES!
>AMD cant compete in basic benchmarks
meanwhile /v/ is insisting absolute shit results === LE INTEL BTFO XDDD
wtf actually based
Higher = better
>$339 vs $479
Also, the 3700X comes with a decent cooler while the 9900K requires some serious aftermarket cooling.
And R20 heavily favours Intel
>Memery clock: 1,073MHz
This amount of kikery needs to be exterminated
Intel have shortage problem and you want them to lower price? Yeah right.
Do you not understand how stupid posting that makes you look?
>What if Intel decides to lower prices to AMD's level?
Intel would have to lower the 9700k to $200.
That'd be cutting the price in HALF.
Not happening.
sneed
based sneedposter