Official AMD /coping/ thread

Get in here AMDrones and give us your best cope.

Attached: 1562507641995.png (653x726, 34K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx_5700-rx_5700_xt,6216-7.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

New Ryzen seems disappointing but gpus decent for the price. Who would have thought.

THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BEAT INTEL THIS TIME. WHY DO THEY KEEP LETTING US DOWN?!?!?

Attached: 1437194153303.png (680x680, 290K)

I'm really angry right now. I was led to believe zen2 would be a no brainer for gaming and waited half a year. Now I'm about to buy a i7 9700k.

Mommy Su blew out Intel's asshole with her 15 inch megacock and made Nvidia clean it up

whatever I'm just waiting for zen2+

I was gonna get amd after the embargo lifted but they still don't beat rtx 2070 super.

guess im going with Team Green in my new rig

oi rite guys how its goen

super cards shit all over them, i'd rather pay a little extra for something that's good than some amd chink shit.

Maybe if you play at like 720p

Attached: oh no.jpg (712x817, 135K)

>JUST WAIT™ for Zen 2+
>JUST WAIT™ for Zen 3

They are pushed to wall so hard that the literally die when you try to OC them like HU's 3900X

I really expected the opposite.

No, intel cope thread. Zen 2 is a success, you faggot. You looked at 0 benchmarks and decided 'well, Zen 2 is bad! hahaha!!!!'. Keep get cheated on

actual reviews will be 30% worse than inflated amd benchmarks and fake leaks.

Leaks? Amd benchmarks? Those are 3rd party reviews, retard. NDA has lifted.

>Why yes I'm still rocking a 2600K, I'll upgrade only after it's 10 year anniversary
>How did you know?

Attached: gigachad 2.png (503x398, 96K)

We got too cocky bros, 7nm just wasn't enough to beat 14nm.

The mentally disabled russian amd shill is missing. Went low for now until the next shill cycle.

Because you are saving pictures of shirtless buffed males on your computer?

>leaks

they did literally beat intel, though.
it's just that they didn't quite beat them with gaming

intel is a housefir-

Attached: cpu-temperature.png (500x530, 39K)

>9900k
>57C

>nh-u12s
>for 12 core cpu
>not nh-d15

Intel 10nm = TSMC 5nm

Looks like review samples aren't getting much better than Zen+ all core OCs.
Unlike some chucklefucks i wasn't expecting anything higher than the boost clocks but this does surprise me.
My expectations were low but i was still disappointed. Impressive

I'm not coping, you're coping

Never wait for new electronics. We fucking told you

Depends in what terms. In terms of performance we don't know if TSMC's 5nm will be able to beat Intel's 14nm++++++++ given how 7nm performs in Ryzen.

If you don't have a 2080Ti, the difference won't ever matter.

Its fucking over guys. No way i will be able to make profits on my amd stock now

Only gamers have anything to cope over.

Attached: 1562505652241.png (1458x771, 140K)

Sure then pay the extra 30-50 sheckels, but make sure to account for that in your price to performance calculations vs the 9900k

Intel 5GHz = AMD 4GHz

what are we supposed to cope with?

Attached: Screenshot_14.png (1022x540, 228K)

Yeah, because everyone is a poorfag like you.

>why yes i do use my pc exclusively to run synthetic cpu tests, how could you tell?

Right, people totally run Cinebrnch all fucking say. So productive, much wow.

>Why yes I'm still rocking a Q6600, and I might upgrade some day, how could you tell?

Attached: 1546493888717.jpg (1242x1394, 156K)

i just dont get it. cope? with what?

Attached: Screenshot_15.png (997x474, 47K)

Uh, all the benchmarks I can find after the NDA ended show AMD beating Intel in gaming or equaling Intel, while taking less power and being cheaper??

What's going on?

Attached: 1562343768060.png (586x586, 470K)

>AMDrones keep posting synthetic benchmarks
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA COPE

>101C

EVACUATE THE HOUSE IMMEDIATELY

>You didn't drop 1300€ for a GPU ? Poorfag !

They're good products, they're just less than 90% of people were saying they were going to be here an hour ago.
Go back a month and niggers were claiming 4.7GHz overclocks too.
Don't pretend that didn't happen now. Almost no one was reining in the hype.

Have you tried stop being poor? It's not hard, you know.

>you know
>>>/reddit/

But it still has a better price to performance ratio??
Plus why don't you just use the stock cooler that comes with the Ryzen?

It's KikePowerup, what did you expect?

Cinebench, 7zip, Blender, GCC...Ryzen 3000 is a productivity monster. The Intel should only appeal to people who do literally nothing but play games all day.

Lol imagine repeating AMD's 2017 line. Ryzen 3000s are literally bigger housefires than Intel 9000s

Sour grapes

>literally going non sequitur
It's okay user, you just want to please your jewish overlords.

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx_5700-rx_5700_xt,6216-7.html

> At the original price points AMD set for Radeon RX 5700 and Radeon RX 5700 XT, it was going to end up stuck between GeForce RTX 2070 Super, GeForce RTX 2060 Super, and GeForce RTX 2060. But with Radeon RX 5700 pinned at $350 and Radeon RX 5700 XT selling for $400, they’re head-to-head against Nvidia’s 2060s. The result is a much more straightforward comparison.
Across our benchmark suite, Radeon RX 5700 XT averages 9.9%-higher frame rates than the GeForce RTX 2060 Super. Radeon RX 5700 averages 11%-higher frame rates than the GeForce RTX 2060. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super does serve up average frame rates 6.9% higher than Radeon RX 5700 XT, but it costs an extra 25%.
Compared to AMD’s previous generation, Radeon RX 5700 XT achieves 15%-higher average frame rates than Radeon RX Vega 64 at a $100-lower launch price and 76% of the power consumption. And get this—the boutique Radeon VII averages just 3.8%-higher frame rates across our suite and costs 70% more!

>Better price performance ratio
Not anymore. AMD shot themselves in the foot this time.

cope with lesser electricity bills?

Attached: Screenshot_17.png (1022x469, 49K)

Hi bro

Attached: gigachads.jpg (640x648, 65K)

AYYMDPOORFAGS LOSING IN CPUS AND GPUS AGAIN

ah shit, man. im getting 5% less fps for 30% lesser power draw and 20% less heat output. WHAT AM I EVER GOING TO DO!?!?! oh wait, ill buy the cpu

Attached: Screenshot_18.png (982x498, 165K)

They already use billion marketing toward e-sport but now they lose to zen2 in CS:GO.

LMAO I thought Zen2 was gonna be disappointing but DAMN I didn't expect thsi much of a HOLOCAUST

AyyYmd in a worse position than at first gen ryzen launch

Attached: 03900288.png (765x586, 240K)

NOOOOO BROS
A $200 i5 IS STILL BETTER THAN OUR $700 POOZEN

Attached: relative-performance-games-1920-1080 (2).png (500x1250, 79K)

AMD BTFO. Same old story.

>9400f
Based

>Uh, all the benchmarks I can find after the NDA ended show AMD beating Intel in gaming or equaling Intel,

Attached: Capture3.png (1364x728, 618K)

coping hard as fuck right now bros, how will we ever recover?!

Attached: 51751072401.png (1500x1250, 328K)

waitinf for Ryzen 3, fuck Lisa Su and fuck Jow Forums for shilling and scamming. I could have built 9700k build months ago and dabbing on dem trannies right now

This time they BTFO themselves with the ridiculous amount of hype they generated

Hahaha just wait for Zen2+

>Mfw Intel is losing e-sports

Attached: Holocaust.png (1084x587, 232K)

Just wait for benchmarks of competitive multiplayer games like PUBG, Fortnite, Apex Legends... Given the fact that Ryzen 3 REKT intel in CSGO, this means that their single core performance isn't a meme

That's pathetic

It's always the same shit with AyyMD

>tease a new product
>AMDrones overhype product
>real product is nowhere near close what AMDrones hyped it to be
>hide during release day and get BTFO by reviewers
>rinse and repeat

AMDrones will be back when their 16-core processor shows up

implying csgo will be an esport this time next year

>mfw AMD is losing in value

Attached: Capture6.png (1363x769, 446K)

>what are launch prices

Bitch, most esports game played now will have died when CS will still be played as an esports.

Nobody was ever hyping Zen 2 to dominate Intel across the board. Zen 2+ is when we will see that.

cs is literally eternal

uh we hyped it up to be within margin of error of 9900k for much cheaper...thats exactly where it is. incel coping is pure gold right now lmao. theres literally no reason to buy intel in 99% of use cases. 3600 is basically an 8700k for $200 and this gen absolutely shits on the 2xxx series

lmao 9400f still mufhakin KING of desktop

Nice COPE AMDrones

Archives don't lie

>How did you know?
>how could you tell?

You look extremely dumb.

there's no need to be jelly, user

Attached: 22220542_319386541861155_2741447504431153152_n.jpg (832x1000, 47K)

Yup, he doesn't know what he's talking about

Guys it will get better with new drivers.

>posts 12 core chip value
>zero mention of productivity with 4 extra cores
>3700x literally right there winning in the same pic
>3600 isn't even reviewed yet
kek

It's only 10% worse. That's literaly nothing.

Incels right now:
>BEING PRODUCTIVE DOESN'T MATTER

Yep, casual games like CSGO have huge audiences because it's so easily accessible. Not sure how it got meme'd into esports though

Based

Attached: Specs.png (925x618, 434K)

AMD told us it'd be the same or faster.

they were coping so hard when the game was dying so they made it f2p. the hype will die again when boomers have stopped playing it all together and when the short attention span of zoomers will take them to something else.

This is amazing

>2080 ti
shouldve bought an rtx 2070 or 2060 if you really wanted the raytracing. why waste so much cash? i7 2600k is based though, ill give you that

this is the point. Intcels think they won because they still win the actual benchmark. however, AMD's goal was to reach parity. and AdoredIdiot parroting is stupid.

I'm not a brand loyalist, but AMD being able to reach parity might also be good for those who are waiting for Sunny Cove.

Intel wins, AMD wins, WE ALL WIN. Competition is here to stay.

>parity
AYYYYYYYYYYMD gest ANNIHILATED in all games bruh..

the only sane post. thank fuck amd is being competent so that intel wont sit on 4/8 cores for three more centuries

Had 1K laying around for a PC upgrade, and the choice was either get a low-medium grade PC, or upgrade my existing one with the best GPU.
After seeing the CPU market make almost no progress I made my choice.

>6 cores vs 12
kys

I'd like to thank you for labeling your posts