AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Review

techpowerup.com/review/amd-radeon-rx-5700-xt/28.html

guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-radeon-rx-5700-and-5700-xt-review,1.html

tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx_5700-rx_5700_xt,6216.html

So?

Attached: relative-performance_3840-2160 (2).png (500x970, 52K)

Other urls found in this thread:

translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Radeon-RX-5700-Grafikkarte-274683/Specials/Radeon-Anti-Lag-Test-Navi-1293817/&prev=search
twitter.com/AnonBabble

it's trash as we expected

Its a bit hot but seems good. Like the 5700 better.

Nice try shill. You amdniggers couldn't stop riding Navi's dick for years. Now it's "expected to underperform" lmao.

I bought ryzen 3000 and nvidia super, no shilling here

Late to market and cucked with release from competitor in 2 days.Yikes

Would look great if Nvidia hadn't SUPER'D and AMD had announced them with the non-retarded price point to start. So it's shit for now.

Better than I expected anyway. Wonder if they're stuck at 64 CU on the high end or if they can go bigger

really good for 1080p, on par with 2080


Consider something else if you play 4k

Navi21 is 80 CU

is that the 5800? do we know when they're likely to launch?

>still gets cucked by 7 to 12% by my 1080ti

Attached: AYYMD6.jpg (633x758, 156K)

1070 Ti owner here. I was waiting for Navi to save me. Pass the gun bro.

14% slower and 25% cheaper , but with a shit cooler and no rtx( for what is worth ) .

all that means is you dont have to spend money

Its shit, it would be good if it was cheap but its not.
And the versions with real heatsinks will be more expensive making the card even more pointless.

There's no marketing name yet. Expect it sometime next year.

I was a little concerned, but it seems I did good getting that used 1080 Ti.

Still too much expensive

Is there any word on if opengl is any better than on GCN?

1. it performs 7% lower than 2070S for $100 less
2. image sharpening actually works, that's unexpected
3. it has same power draw as 2070S, also a surprise, I expected it to be at least 250w
4. anti lag also works, don't know what they did but it's 11ms faster than nvidia in BF5, and about 4-6 in other games
basically a good purchase if AIBs keep it under $430

Attached: Anti-Lag-BFV-RX-5700-XT-2070S-FHD-FFR-on-pcgh.png (934x531, 20K)

translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Radeon-RX-5700-Grafikkarte-274683/Specials/Radeon-Anti-Lag-Test-Navi-1293817/&prev=search

here is a question, how would 60fps feel with anti lag?
we argue about 0.005ms difference here in raw fps performance, when this feature gives clean ~4ms in response feedback
just fyi high fps is not about how it looks, it's about how it feels

I did some testing with my Vega card and the lower the fps the more anti lag improves the feeling of responsiveness. But this was all just feel, no proper testing done.

How long does it usually take for cards to come out with custom cooling? Hearing bad things about the blower.

yes

AMD has no drivers

Seems promising but we gotta wait for aftermarket cards with some proper fans.

sure, slimy shill. your so called shit drivers are already just 5-7% behind the 2070Super with a fucking blower fan. now guess what will happen when AiB partners start shipping their cards with good cooling. HU almost got 2100Mhz with 100% fanspeed, GPU sitting around 70°C, with the shittiest cooling solution.

>MSI cheaps out on radeon cards
lmao nice move nvidia, paying off aib's to cripple competition just like Intel did. what a shitshow
what a bunch of dicks

Attached: onJFFuYM5l5MrGOj.jpg (1360x765, 225K)

i will be very mad if MSI won't build a card like for 2060/70 series for nvidia.

Attached: 1963336-n6.jpg (700x416, 49K)

>techpowerup
>

Attached: Untitled.png (1442x421, 50K)

>competes comfortably with the 2070
>at 80% of the price
>trash

Attached: wat-1.jpg (720x687, 124K)

sapphire or nothing.
rumor is 17th july for aibs? I hope it's not august.

reading August for every aib
hope that sapphire will deliver, some PR dude said they want to do a 'Toxic' version

sad, supahs coming on 9th with full range

>buying MSI trash
>ever
AMD have several quality exclusive AIBs (Sapphire, PowerColor and XFX). There's literally no reason to buy the lowest tier chinkshit there is (MSI and Gigabyte) or pay the ANUS tax.

my 1070 from MSI works fine without any hiccup or anything
but yeah for AMD i'd definitely go with Sapphire or XFX. too bad EVGA won't ever make any cards for AMD

>will almost certainly drop in price in a short time
i really want one

and in the metric that really counts its a big

FAILURE

Attached: 3624982364982.png (546x651, 98K)

It's good as we expected

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x970, 51K)

Why the hate on MSI? I love their
products from the GTX900s and they literally had the best r9 390 and r9 390x pcb. I dunno what happened after vega launch where they branded all amd cards armor coolers

t.never seen kepler or any card before maxwell

yeah XT is garbage, get the 5700 instead

Attached: .png (500x970, 52K)

>it's worse but for a slightly lower price
nah, it's garbage until they can release something that performs BETTER for a lower price like their cpus.

Attached: untitled-25.png (686x1078, 86K)

maxwell was fucking efficient

Why the fuck wouldn't they make cheap AMD cards?

Needs a third party cooler, though the only one i've seen is a Sapphire which is bad for me personally as i have an ITX case limited to 2 slots boards.

It would be hilarious if they didn't. Then Jow Forums would complain that they're too expensive

Why does it choke so hard on 4K? It looks very solid for 1440p and 1080p.

It might be the />100hz card/