Microkernels DEFEAT monolithic kernels by means of phase angle controls utilized through composite thyristor/VPI intelligent PREBINDING. This saves time by avoiding unnecessary CTP calculations when addressing binary PLATE QUADS sequenced by the integrated data transistor interface.
Microkernels DEFEAT monolithic kernels by means of phase angle controls utilized through composite thyristor/VPI...
Jaxon Evans
Other urls found in this thread:
connect.linaro.org.s3.amazonaws.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Mason Perry
What did you use as the source for your Markov text generator?
Owen Martin
> retarded gibberish
kys
Justin Peterson
Listen, monolithic kernels are dead and there is nothing you can do about it.
Julian Jackson
very based. I'm glad to see more talk of microkernels in threads now. This the kind of next-generation technology that the world needs.
connect.linaro.org.s3.amazonaws.com
great read.
Jonathan Davis
> LOOK MOM! I POSTED CSIRO RESEARCH PRODUCED BY MORONS THAT CAN'T EVEN PROTECT THEIR OWN SERVERS AGAIN! I AM TEH FUNNIEST
kys as well, you dribbling fucking retard. microkernels are not new and are completely cancerous.
Liam Diaz
In what way?
>muh performance
It's not 1980, grandpa. we've come a long way since mach.
Elijah Miller
when is OpenBSD switching to a microkernel
Nolan Collins
Even Jewgle can see the benefit of this architecture!
en.wikipedia.org
Liam Miller
openbsd is even more monolithic than linux dude
Leo Rogers
I want to write Rust for Fuchsia.
Oliver Miller
>It's not 1980, grandpa. we've come a long way since mach.
> he thinks microkernels worked in the 80s
oh sweet zoomer cancer, get on the end of a rope and neck yourself. what a dumb cunt.
Robert Bennett
(OP)
Purely functional do-everythings completely defeat coarse microkernels. Imagine having more than the exact specific function calls than you need to get your computations / hardware access done. It's a bloat nightmare!
And for actual general purpose computing they're about as close to existing in usable form as are microkernels. Not really within reach.
Charles Butler
seriously this is how everything read when I first started learning about operating systems
Jacob Myers
Don't forget that Apple proved that microkernels have better performance
Chase Hughes
Careful now, you wouldn't want to admit Apple did something right now would you?
Daniel Morales
XNU and NT are both hybrids (read: bastardized microkernels). What happened that they lost their microness?
Asher Roberts
>composite thyristor/VPI intelligent PREBINDING
good luck with that
>PLATE QUADS
ayy now we're talking
Noah Lopez
They had a need for high performance. That's why they decided to move certain operations back into the Kernel so they would avoid unnecessary context switches.
Kayden Ortiz
Hybrid kernels are objectively the best, though. Micros are slow.
David Jones
>What happened that they lost their microness?
Ignored decades of research, so their performance was lacking.