Why the fuck is "18 years old" and anything to do with pornography censored from google search(and also reddit for my fellow 'tors out there)?
"19 years old" works and "18 year old" too but add an "s" and everything is gone
google is technology so this fits here
Other urls found in this thread:
trends.google.com
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
The Victor's write history (law). And the victors (Google), in this case, were moralfriends .
I find it really weird that they only went halfway with it even adding another s to 18 yearss old works it's fucking stupid also don't understand why 19 is ok but 18 isn't
16 is okay in Canada
Damn that's pretty IMAGINEpilled
I don't really care, but I'm glad you fucks are being pushed out of the internet.
First we remove you from internet, then TV, finally law.
Religious freedom won't help you here - it only prevents the government from forbidding a religion, not sick shit committed by its believers. Your vile christian shit isn't protected.
I'll gladly get censored if it means less pedo fucks out there in the streets.
Because youth bad! Accept the roastie world order and modernist high age of consent!
Kill yourself you fucking hamplanet saggy disgusting whore. Youre why women dont deserve to vote.
yeah 19-20 years old shouldn't jack it off to 18 years old that's like against the quran or some shit
Google censors all kinds a shit, including stuff it probably wouldn't if it wasn't doing it to make those who oppose it's agenda look bad.
>muh agenda
Oh no, it's schizos at it again
>google doesnt have an agenda
Oh no jewgle shills at it again
>found the 20 year old
How is this legal if america loves so much their freedom?
At least they should be required by law to publish a complete list of censored searchs, accompained by a valid legal reason for each one
Deception is unethical, so if they disclose what search results they are censoring that's enough for me. But they don't and they claim otherwise as well (falsely).
>my fellow 'tors out there
get the fuck out
who is that loli
Because they're paranoid given most "18 year olds" happen to be underage.
>pic related
>creeping on cunny
What did He-Man mean by this?
Men gonna be men, he's gotta be he.
Getting that prime pussy before it goes rancid and stretched out.
>can't even swear on tv
Yeah sure it's the land of freedom
>doesn't like someone's sexual preferences
>wants mass censorship to combat them
Censorship is the one threat to the world that'll enable corruption in a world where this isn't necessary
How actually are you implying that censorship leads to less pedo fucks in the streets? I don't know about you, but one company saying "you can't" won't lead to people just giving up.
Why the fuck are you even posting on Jow Forums when you don't respect people's freedom?
Check out the project veritas leak
It isn't.
google search
>clinton's emails
>trump's email
No hinting on clinton's emails. hinting on trumps. Okay it's an open platform you say and that just doesn't have enough search volume. See the trends:
trends.google.com
Oh I suppose I'm shizo for using googles own tools to prove their bias. They censor results. They have a "fairness ML" AI algorithm that is tuned to program people by selectively censoring information and recommending or prioritizing selective information. You are using a bias propaganda website masquerading as a "fair open platform".
Any retard who thinks google is open and fair needs to go dialate and fuck off to plebbit. Everyone knows kikes run big tech and big media this is clearly a retard or a concern shill, welcome to the rabbit hole uninitiated zoomers.
Try mom teen
>moralfriends
Yet they mine and share your data up the yin yang
14 Is okay in germany. Under specific circumstances, at least. No Pornography of minors is allowed though.
Because they consider it a porn related term, and they probably have billions of search query results to back that up
At the current rate, searching for "feet" or "brap" will probably end up in the blacklist, too
>blacklisting legal search terms
So this is acceptable why? I wasn't aware it was a search engines job to decide if it personally agrees with your request or not.
No
It's more in terms of then trying to hide offensive results, the same way they remove identifying people when you search using an image
It's a business decision to avoid legal issues in terms of privacy, the adult filter, certain cultural boundaries
I guess that if you set the search engine to not hide adult stuff it will work, but even with that disabled Google photos stopped showing pornography all together because every single word led to some porn pics
>hiding offensive results
who decides what is offensive and what is not? Is the science of biology and chromosomes offensive claiming there are only two genders?
They are also censoring other search results unrelated to pornography at their own discretion. So i'm confused are they a publisher or a search engine? Because search engines do not get to censor results (safe search off, etc....) but they are currently doing so.
Basically the law
You think about moral boundaries, but in some countries some stuff is literally against the law, apart from the usual shit
Ie: swastikas in Germany, specific content in China...
You mean when mohammed tries to marry your 14 year old daughter or he'll splash acid in her face?
>splash acid in her face
You're confusing the Reich with the United Kingdom of Pakistan
What a projectile diarrhea thread. Also this:
Can't you just fucking go with 19 or watch loli or some shit?
Also SJW ans anti SJW comments: stfu, being decent to children is not a political agenda