All instruction set architectures should be public domain & free to use by everyone as to prevent processor monopolies

>x64

Attached: 124456768979.jpg (367x388, 16K)

In order to use long mode, you MUST use paging. If TempleOS is a 64-bit OS, then it uses virtual memory. Terry was probably a retarded fuck who just identity mapped it all.

He said himself that all physical memory is mapped to a single page. If you think that's "using virtual memory" you're technically correct but severely retarded

Attached: 1553826133061.jpg (990x682, 49K)

Is this the new terry thread?

Attached: 1541109515196.gif (429x592, 2.8M)

start writing. Start writing stuff that you give away free, make it nice and original so everyone wants it, then hire an army of lawyers to stop nasty people from stealing it and making it into stuff that rips everyone off. Here's how that works
1) devote all your time, for ten years or so, to writing some shit that everyone wants
2) give it away free
3) hire some lawyers on your welfare handouts
4)go to court and get shit on by people who can afford 30,000 dollar an hour lawyers
5)end up with a bill for 2 million
6)make some more free shit to pay the bills
7)get a girlfriend who you met when you were both jacking up heroin into your ankles
8) lose your girlfriend at some party in an alley when you got drunk and passed out
9)push your shopping trolley full of your empty beer bottles all around town looking for her for ten years

I am working on a chip design, a very specialised chip only few will work with. Design takes years. If we don't protect our inventions, how will we even cover our initial investment?

No. Capitalism means EVERYONE is allowed to have private ownership of the means of production. Not one group of people.

By selling products? If someone makes a better chip then you and you go out of business then tough shit, that's called competition

>By selling products? If someone makes a better chip then you and you go out of business then tough shit, that's called competition
Of course competitors could sell our design cheaper: they have not spent 4 years developing the design. With your idea of "competition", all small companies will be steamrolled by the big companies and then quit.

That is already happening so I see no difference, it is incredibly risky and expensive to start a "small" hardware company.

It's a nice though but it's never gonna happen

What part of intellectual property is free market? Not againdt IP btw but it is actually anti capitalist.

Could this be the reason we are still saddled with 1970's ISA? The main player see little reason to deliver more than hype and the small guys are crushed as ants to maintain dominance?

Attached: cyberpunk_hacker_by_mercikos_d8akxi.jpg (506x706, 167K)

Fuck off commie

>Not againdt IP btw but it is actually anti capitalist.
Capitalism is simply that the means for production should be privately held. And there is nothing about IP which is counter to that, to the contrary it means there is IP and that it can be owned privately.

Perhaps you meant anti free market.

>I want them to stop setting up schemes where by law they are the only ones allowed to make money and everyone else is poor and has to beg them to do things

Attached: scared-nervous-panic-sweaty-cry-desperate-jew-kike-yid-hebrew-tears-merchant.png (354x504, 129K)

Patents in general should be abolished, but the manufacturers should be able to keep trade secrets for as long as they are able. Which is often quite long, or at least long enough to get something newer and better out the door before your competition can freely copy you.

Attached: 1385539847558.jpg (500x380, 56K)

Have you considered the consequences of this?

And I can confirm that trade secrets can last a long time. I co-developed a chip architecture that remains a trade secret well after any patents would have expired. The secret is in a place nobody will begin to guess thee is something extra going on so there will be nobody reverse engineering this.

stop reposting this shitty watermarked picture, you retarded redditor

Which would be a positive outcome, because people would buy the best product and not the one from the most jewish company which has the highest amount of lawyers.

Make your own. The ruskies are already doing it.

One point of patents is to have the invention published in detail so that others can build on earlier work. pharmaceutical research uses this a lot, see "secondary indications".

With extensive use of trade secrets and in countries such as US and UK, that would be restricted with the limited rights to reverse engineering.

I'd say that patents, and the drug approval process in general do far more to let patent holders corner the market (ie, Epipen) and to hold back promising new drugs and procedures from ever seeing sale. And sharing trade secrets with collaborators would probably largely take the place of publicly filed patents. You can bind collaborators by contract to not disclose secrets with penalties for violating the agreement. I cannot agree with the patent system which automatically enters everyone else into a binding agreement to abide a monopoly.

How can one man be so based, smart and cute at the same time?

Attached: 1513052596245.jpg (453x358, 20K)

>I'd say that patents, and the drug approval process in general do far more to let patent holders corner the market (ie, Epipen)
A patent isn't a free license to print money, there are still rules to follow. Also governments have the option of compulsory licensing according to TRIPS, though few outside India uses it. Also a patent lasts up to 20 years from priority date, these days.

>and to hold back promising new drugs and procedures from ever seeing sale.
How?

>And sharing trade secrets with collaborators would probably largely take the place of publicly filed patents. You can bind collaborators by contract to not disclose secrets with penalties for violating the agreement.
Trouble is, if someone breaks the agreement it can be hard to pin the blame on someone. Also in a time with massive espionage, such a collaboration will leak. the trade secrets I have been part of were all carefully kept internal.

>I cannot agree with the patent system which automatically enters everyone else into a binding agreement to abide a monopoly.
In an alternative future new drugs are not patented, nor published, but you will have to travel to a remote Pacific island owned by Big Pharma, get a treatment and leave only when the active compounds have been washed out of your body. I am not sure that is preferably to what we have now. It would kill off simplified applications based on secondary indications pretty quickly.

Nobody thinks the patent system is perfect. it is just that the alternatives seem rather ugly.

>forcing competition is "asking for other people's money
the absolute state of monopolyfags

when the big companies copy your stuff they will have to sell it cheap, thing that benifits society as a whole not just you.
if they dont sell cheap then you will not run out of business as you can sell cheaper and make money out of it. in any case society profits.
if the big one indeed sell cheap you and only you will be damage society will profit from cheaper and now better chips.
that is why it has to be allowed.
if its not. then only you can sell it. without if it is the best ways to make chips, no one can make chips that can compete so you are the new monopoly. you can sell cheap at the begining to run competition out of business as they cant sell chips as cheap and good at the same time.
so competition is gone and now you are a monopoly free to overprice everything. only you benefit.
hell yeah, now that is freedom, freedom to copy and freedom to protect you shit from being copied at the same time