Where the FUCK are the 120Hz phones and laptops. Why is this still not a thing

Most gaming phones are 90 or 120. Oneplus is kinda mainstream hence why I said 90Hz is semi-mainstream, I expect Samsung to release one soon as well, they made they display in the first place after all.

>she doesn't call to Hitler himself every night with her OC'ed 14.88GHz phone
y even live bruv

Because 99% of people can't tell the difference between 60 and 120 Hz. Also because how low power these devices are they generally have an excess of 10ms of screen response time which means even IF they made 120Hz screens (which some gaymen laptops do) the few people that can tell the difference will complain about ghosting and motion artifacts.

To make matters WORSE, you "see" the world in less FPS as you age which is why kids appear to adults like meth addled mentally unstable shizos, they literally see the world in like 100 FPS and see people in somewhat slow motion. You can in theory go into "bullet time" even as an adult but it requires immediate danger and a heightened flight or fight response which can also kill you by the sheer amount of adrenaline and mental shock experienced.

tl;dr unless you're a literal child or have some rare mutation you won't be able to tell the differance between 60 and 120Hz and your laptop/phone display is probably already shit so you're already seeing ghosting and other motion artifacts even at 60Hz.

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-01-07-at-3.53.47-PM.png (605x399, 18K)

what do you need 120hz in a phone for?

interleaving the frames of 2 60fps porn videos while I'm riding the subway

You don't but companies love milking zoomer nugaymers. The razor phone for example has 10-20ms of response time which produces ghosting and other motion artifacts at 60Hz.

notebookcheck.net/Razer-Phone-2-Smartphone-Review.372536.0.html

Attached: Untitled.png (745x592, 79K)

IRONICALLY an S9 with a 60Hz is magnitudes better for displaying 60 FPS content than the razor phone. With only 3 to 6ms of response time there should extremely little if any noticeably ghosting on 60 FPS content.

notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S8-Smartphone-Review.209502.0.html

Attached: Untitled.png (756x576, 153K)

I guess I'm a mutant then

What monitor are you using that you claim you can tell the difference on? It's not uncommon to mistake motion artifacts for having better eyesight (ie dropped frames and severe ghosting).

Higher fps reduces ghosting and jank in animations. Fps difference is barely noticeable in content with baked-in motion blur(movies), somewhat noticeable in 3d graphics and SUPER noticeable in 2d graphics - it makes total sense to render GUIs in higher fps. Even simply moving mouse cursor looks different.

NOPE, lower response time does. Most people that watch 60 FPS content actually experience ghosting and possibly even dropped frames along with other motion artifacts since like I mentioned low power IPS displays have response times exceeding 10ms baring mobile devices with amoled/oled displays ofc.

The only real benefit 75/90Hz displays had back in the days of CRT (0ms response times) was they lowered flickering since frames were drawn line by line akin to building a brick house. Amoled/oled solved this problem by being able to turn on or off ALL pixels at the same time with close to 1ms of true GtG response time.

Attached: motion1.gif (741x425, 146K)