What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Attached: 4116220_0.jpg (630x630, 66K)

nothing

The Linux Foundation sold it out. It's now controlled by companies like Microsoft and everyone shits on GNU and freedom.

Freetards unironically expect people to waste hours on most basic tasks.

In terms of what it does?
Nothing, it's still an efficient platform that's great for service hosting and programing.
In terms of the original goal?
Faggots that hate freedom, that's what.

>most distros relied on ubuntu
>ubuntu is slowly going to shit
>lack of simple user experiences drive people away from the platform
>useless in a professional environment unless you animate in 3D or code

It found itself some small niches like http servers, network appliances and supercomputing, but it never became mainstream (and never will) because you just can't compete with the multibillionaire corporations on account of them being consistently able to attract superior talent thanks to their resources.

no office
>inb4 meme alternatives
they suck balls

Small niches like miniaturized surveillance devices.

Attached: chartoftheday_4112_smartphone_platform_market_share_n.jpg (960x684, 171K)

They adopted a CoC

Appeasing trannies became more important than performance.

Attached: 20190517_224751.png (1440x2475, 359K)

I wonder if those results are affected by intel cpu mitigations

no games
literally nothing else

Linux dominates low-end devices, no one in the first world uses Android.

A lot of stuff is going right, what's going wrong is that there are too many distributions.
In my opinion there should be only 3: one for desktops, one for servers, and one for lowspec.
No serious software house wants to chase the flavor of the month. It's a lot of time wasted for testing and cooking workarounds.
Less fragmentation means more drivers with higher reliability, less confusion for consumers, less hassle for developers, ready-to-use binaries, and higher market penetration.

Congrats, you're the wrongest I've ever seen anyone be

nothing. people dont use because there is no software (i mean good ones not these free shit) there is no software because developers wont spend money to develop to a plataform that has no users. it would be just thrwoing money away.
somone has to make the first step, will it be the developers or the users?

to be honest i think the excuse developeres use to not make things for linux is nonsense.
you can use that excuse when picking between mac and windows. if you go for mac, only a small amount of users is willing to spend the resources to buy a mac when they already got a pc with windows.
but linux is free. there is no cost to switching to linux. that excuse developers give is utter bullshit.
someone got to to tell this truth to the developers. maybe they will start making software for free oses only like linux and bsd. as these wont cost anything for the user to make the switch.
and with grub you can even have more than 1 as unlike windows it will not fuck your boot when it update

Poeterring, and the lgbt community that took over.

MacToddlers and WinFags expect everyone to comply with their masochist anti-freedom anti-privacy cocksucking behaviour.

Attached: faggot-01.jpg (806x569, 342K)

That sounds more like Windows.

Lazy freetard don't care to make it usable for the general public with nice fancy GUIs for everything and good drivers, their autism is making them think that everyone is capable of using CLI crap like it's stil 1980s DOS age

Free"tards" let the voles at microsoft do the work for them.
Didn't you read the post right above yours?
Turns out the tards ain't free, they just do the work, and M$ pays them, because it seems Linux won.

nothing bro the vast majority of devices on planet earth are using it, the real question is what went wrong at microsoft that their shitty bloated OS is essentially bound to old-school computers due to insane system requirements for it not to be laggy shit

The Linux Foundation, while a shitty organization, has 100s of other donors besides Microsoft. Try looking at the list sometime.
>everyone shits on GNU and freedom.
Linus has always bashed stallman and his politics, literally nothing has changed.

Unironically package management. If developers had a way to compile a program into an executable and it just werked on any distro Linux would have already become the standard OS a long time ago now. The amount of work the developers of a given distro put into packaging software for you shouldn't be deterministic in weather or not a distro is worth using. Developers should be in charge of packaging their programs, and they shouldn't have to worry about it working on several different distros.

That is a terrible idea, see the mess that is Flatpak for why it's never going to work. Shipping binaries is for windows programmers.

>a way to compile a program into an executable and it just werked on any distro
./configure && make && make install

endless debates on systemd, extreme fragmentation of the kernel's implantation, an elitist userbase, no useful software, lots of security vulnerabilities, as well as an emotionally unstable, abusive figurehead continues to stall the growth of the Linux kernel

apt install checkinstall