HDMI is so trash it needs 3 separate connections to achieve 8k @60hz

youtube.com/watch?v=OcUv-TzVWUc

>HDMI is so trash it needs 3 separate connections to achieve 8k @60hz
>Nvidia and AMD get defeated by the 8k nippons and gooks

8k is the new 3d tv

Attached: linustries8k.png (1681x835, 1.74M)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>8k is the be 3dtv
Nah 8k was supposed to be the real endgame for a while.
4k was has always been a cash grab, and most studios skipped it.

Only 1 HDMI 2.1 connection

It's the GPUs that are trash for not supporting it.
Movies are all 4:2:0 24fps anyway so cinephiles, the people who actually buy these expensive TVs, don't even need HDMI 2.1 for anything but eARC.

>Fucks around with some retarded Quadro shit instead of trying a amd card
What the shit

smol

Attached: 8k.webm (982x634, 1.15M)

There WILL be 8k smartphones and you know it (and already hate it)

Can we even discern 8k vs 4k

He tried a Radeon 7 and suprise suprise it didn't work.
TLDR cables were fucky

he tried an amd card for like 5 minutes and gave up. not that it matters, no AMD card can push 8K. do they even make a modern firepro that competes with quadro?

>uses active adapters for half the video
>wonders why shit doesn't work
What the hell.

I bet the Radeon vii would have worked better at 8k but he didn't show that
The Radeon vii can run 8k okay and isn't $10,000

He was only caring about output, stupid drone.

kek

If you do the math, to even see 8k you have to sit 1/4th the screen diagonal away. So for a 24” screen you have to sit no further than 6” away. This is assuming 20/20 vision.

It’s worthless. Anybody who falls for this meme is retarded. Like, lower than 65 IQ.

Please stop advertising here

probably on a big enough screen, yes

Image quality from a good DSLR at 1080p is better than this NU 4k and 8k.
Fucking meme numbers.

If you sat 8 feet away the screen would have to be 32’.

It’s a placebo for retards.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

Hdmi 2.1 needs to use DSC, which it supports btw so it can support it technically. 8k@60hz is almost 60gbps at 8-bits, hdmi 2.1 is 48gbps with full bandwidth. For 12-bit HDR profiles like Dolby Vision it's like over 80gbps + some shit for metadata and audio or whatever. Probably like 85-90gbps.

DP2 when it's mainstream in a decade will be able to support 8k and 10-bit natively.

..what about if it was 65"

Stop posting this video faggot

The only use for that will be a Jumbotron where you sit 2’ from the screen.

at what point will you fags be content with your elitist garbage? next year, you'll all be on about 16k or some nonsense while 1080p is more than enough

1/4th a screen diagonal, so 16” away.

You’d never even see the whole screen. It’s a placebo for retards.

No.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

XGA is all you will ever need. If you aren’t retarded.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

>1/4th a screen diagonal, so 16” away.
>You’d never even see the whole screen. It’s a placebo for retards.

Look at a 30" 1080p monitor from 16" away. You'll fucking notice it. 4k on a 65" isn't enough, it's super sparse, worse than 24" 1080p monitors and you can easily notice a jump up to 1440p

>while 1080p is more than enough
cope harder poorfag.

>1080p is more than enough
Then why do you use AA in games faggot? Because it's not enough. Just because you won't notice individual pixels doesn't mean you won't notice the granularity of a series of pixels.

8k is literally diminishing returns

No you don’t, do the math. Read a book, incel tranny. The math has been worked out.

You can’t do math but if you could you’d know the smallest angle the human eye (with 20/20 vision) can subtend and you could prove yourself with spherical geometry that I am right. Faggot butt fucking scum sucking idiot.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

I won’t bother with the numbers because you clearly can’t even do univariate algebra but if you could, you would know that anything about 1080 is a mistake.

>gaymer fagit makes a post
Go back to /tg/ butt fucker and make sure to douche with bactine 4x a day.

>tries to daisy-chain DVI, HDMI and DP for a 4k60hz panel
>DVI
>Sharp has to send him cables because no one in his fucking office managed to figure out that DVI CAN'T PASS 4K60hz
never post these negroids again

Attached: file.png (1149x873, 1.41M)

There is literally no use for 4K unless you own a cinema fagtron.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

are you fucking illiterate ?

No, I can do math. To see the difference between 1080 and 4k you have to sit closer than 1 screen diagonal. Nobody does that.

Learn some math faggot retard child.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=vsSlXk0lA5g

where was I endorsing 4k screens you schizo

>Posting dicken suckem unironically
Go to bed kid

Attached: linus_fanbase.jpg (812x621, 79K)

He was literally using an active HDMI to DVI adapter, this guy has no salvation.

Post the math, I'm curious. 8k is clearly retarded but I would like some concrete proof.

Where weren’t you tranny incel?

I’m 6 beers in, the math is all extensively worked out with experimental human confirmation in the book, NHK Hi-Vision Technology. It’s worth buying. You can blow out retarded millennials and zoomers like crazy on their resolution fantasies with it.

TLDR? At the typical viewing distances SD is as good as HD, only with retarded huge screens or nose-to-glass distances does HD let alone 4K or 8k make any difference. This is a mathematical fact.

Won't 2 x 4k monitors = 8k?

Only if you ask Pimax...

4 of them, you mean. 4K is 4x1080p and 8K is 4x2160p.

It's double the pixel width AND height, you need 4X the dimensions for resolution to fill out.

It's only good for VR which is already dying off again since VR is only good for porn and chat rooms.

lela

Not if it works

>g @summer 2019

>640kb is enough for everybody
No, you are the retard here.

>This is a mathematical fact.
Yeh, of people with 20/200 vision. You blind fuck

How many 4x4 squares can an 8x8 square hold