OOP is just the modern, better marketed GOTO.
Use it well, and the code gets cleaner and more readable.
But very few people use it in that way, and the code end up being a hard to debug and expand mess as you don't even know where the shit you need to work on is without following it closely for hours.
OOP is just the modern, better marketed GOTO
Chase Ward
Other urls found in this thread:
quitebasic.com
rextester.com
rextester.com
jdoodle.com
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
Benjamin Young
Is not the same true for every paradigm?
John Anderson
Not all paradigms lead to bad code structure if abused.
They lead to all sorts of other problems, but OO cause pretty similar to GOTO disasters.
Adam Jenkins
Yes, it is
Michael Taylor
What a mess
Julian Young
Mason Bell
UMA
Samuel Martinez
Im your opinion, what is OOP exactly? Do languages like Python and Golang count as OO languages? Or does Java not even count because it's not "completely" OO?
Jeremiah Phillips
Classes, inheritance, objects, all that jazz.
Those things are like the goto command.
Cooper Miller
Jacob Baker
nice, user. really nice.
Dylan Smith
It's quite impressive what you can actually do on the TMS9918 with an modern converter thing.
David Scott
uncommon bait
Jose Jenkins
In that respect I agree that OOP is a lot like GOTO. Useful when used right, but the issue is it's seldom truly appropriate.
A sickle may be useful a tool, but in a world with combine tractors they're pretty much irrelevant.
Carson Fisher
I fell for it. Well done
Hunter Lewis
>Use it well, and [it's good]
>but very few people use it [well]
That's practically the definition of everything every entity in the world ever did. No Fucking Shit.
Luis Lee
Yes yes, but the goto failure mode is quite similar to the OO failure mode.
Dylan Jackson
Thats basically how you do stuff in asm
Jonathan Wilson
Jose Johnson
but BASIC is always return, even if had error
Lincoln Price
bump
Lucas Evans
Caleb Richardson
> this again
just use lisp
John Adams
>Not all paradigms lead to bad code structure if abused
all paradigms lead to bad code when "abused". That's what "abused" means in this context.
Tyler Robinson
OO is a very poorly defined paradigm. What is OO? Is Java OO? Is Smalltalk OO? Is CLOS OO?
Ayden Hernandez
...