Buy Intel for gaming bro

Buy Intel for gaming bro

Attached: CSGO.png (1373x1413, 55K)

N=1

cool statistics bro

>Spend $500 on a CPU to play a game from 2012 bro
CSGO runs on an xbox 360 for fuck's sake.

Attached: 1522972346028.gif (480x360, 1.42M)

Please be kind with AMD shills, they only have a very limited sample of benchmarks in which AMD wins

Cope

>posting anything from AMDunboxed

t. gaymansnextass

I can bring this thread to bump limit with all the benches amd wins

Prove it, sweaty

What's the point of having 500+ FPS when most people only have 144Hz monitors (or at best 200/240Hz) ? I know it reduces input lag but isn't 500 FPS overkill ?

>I can bring this thread to bump limit with all the benches where amd matches intel if you bottleneck the test on the GPU

I'm sure you can but you're still a sad little fuck

Attached: 111263.png (650x450, 39K)

Attached: IMG_20190727_131619.png (1029x1579, 1.18M)

Attached: 1562527942987.png (1588x873, 235K)

Attached: 1562528402112.png (1326x700, 64K)

Attached: 1562529363131.png (1474x876, 630K)

Attached: 1562531769317.png (1302x688, 73K)

It used to speed up load times to have like 999 FPS in loading screens I believe.

Most people set source games to 241 when 120hz was the norm. Twice the refresh rate +1 for some performance reason. Now people seem to recommend 300 FPS max.

Attached: 1562532122588.png (945x1562, 208K)

goy just pay 2x more for 2x more power consumption and 4 more frames its worth it trust me

Attached: 1562538610348.jpg (615x707, 197K)

>AdoredTV literally exposed all the Youtube shills who were getting paid by AMD to spread false benchmarks
>the mentally ill AMD fanboy is still spamming those same benchmarks in every thread

No one even mentioned paywallTV faggot

BUT IN THIS ONE I GET 6

Attached: 1562542590693.png (650x450, 44K)

FaggotTV is just mad because AMD didn't send him samples for testing even after shilling for over a year.

>the intelshills are now using adored as an legitimate source
lmao

Don't waste money in a dead meme company like intel aviv
buy AMD

Attached: shintel.png (1920x1080, 1.02M)

so what this tells me is I need nothing more than the 1600x for gaming because I will literally not see any benefits past that

...

wow you finally stumbled on the final redpill of CPUs congrats retard only took you so long

Attached: 1562550323994.png (1084x587, 275K)

Attached: 1562550395815.png (1679x835, 505K)

>AdoredTV literally exposed all the Youtube shills who were getting paid by AMD to spread false benchmarks
>the mentally ill AMD fanboy is still spamming those same benchmarks in every thread

>Minimum fps for both CPUs is beyond anyone's vsync
What are you trying to prove here?

Attached: 1562550470178.png (959x995, 105K)

>mentally ill intelfag is spamming the same message over an over again like anyone cares what retardTV thinks

Attached: 1562550656176.png (580x708, 27K)

NOOOOO INTELBROS

Attached: 1562551438337.png (632x590, 67K)

higher framerate = (usually) better response time

Attached: 1562594750272.png (650x450, 39K)

Medium
Temps

As someone who doesn't plan on buying another Intel CPU, I'd like to point out that these are horse shit benchmarks.

Attached: 1562614696323.png (1440x720, 317K)

Jesus Christ, ban that mentally ill retard already

>temperature doesn't matter
>preventing GPU bottlenecks doesn't matter
add them to the list

Attached: 1562614741104.png (1440x720, 324K)

OY VEY BAN THIS ANTISEMITISM DELID DIS

Attached: intel jew.png (200x200, 45K)

>AdoredTV literally exposed all the Youtube shills who were getting paid by AMD to spread false benchmarks
>the mentally ill AMD fanboy is still spamming those same benchmarks in every thread

>Stop disproving me
intelfags everyone

Attached: 1562614838031.png (1440x720, 419K)

nice spam bro

Attached: 1562615057820.png (1440x720, 519K)

this can not be happening intelbros

Attached: 1562615176872.png (1440x720, 712K)

but we wuz the sangle kore kangz n sheeit

Attached: 1562615580989.png (500x610, 42K)

People unfortunately actually fall for the placebo effect that a decrease in 5ms is noticeable. Literally just cap the game at 100 fps or 200, if you really NEED it, and get going.

>>temperature doesn't matter
As long as it doesn't overheat, then yeah. I like overclocking as much as anyone else, but I don't see it as a lucky extra.
>>preventing GPU bottlenecks doesn't matter
Where did I say that? It's just not a realistic situation. No one buys high end CPUs to play games on potato GPUs.

Attached: 1562615826759.png (650x450, 44K)

>As long as it doesn't overheat
>hot enough to boil water
>"yea that doesn't matter"

Attached: 1562616430399.png (573x893, 27K)

it cant end like this intelbros

Attached: 1562664698877.png (1341x650, 800K)

>which of these two asymptotically identical things should I buy
>not based on algorithms, hardware innovation, improvement of day-to-day experiences
>instead based on some numbers that OP clearly doesn't understand
>this thread qualifies as """""technology"""""
>implying mindless consumerism doesn't go on get off my board

That pic shows Intel winning though

Just a fun bonus

Attached: chrome_DU5btJ1bjg.png (1095x830, 120K)

Based, intelshitters and their pozzed housefires holocausted.

>$200 midrange cpu within margin of error against intels mainstream flagship that costs 2x as much and has 2.5x the power consumption
somehow this is a win for intel

Attached: 1562706816680.png (650x450, 43K)

Attached: 1562959754590.jpg (1016x613, 121K)

did he even remove fps_max 300?

*Blocks your path*
Checkmate

Attached: 1564230854023.png (1920x1080, 1.13M)

Attached: 1562959822395.jpg (1019x606, 119K)

>>As long as it doesn't overheat
>>hot enough to boil water
>>"yea that doesn't matter
Where's the lie though? If it's designed to handle that temp and doesn't crash then it's fine. Overheat isn't a subjective term. My i5 ThinkPad gets close to that (ffmpeg) and is still kicking. Realistically, any enthusiast will get close to the max temp range anyway.

>look goyim i have one far cry benchmark i win

Attached: 1562960524349.png (722x1036, 72K)

more like check your ass for hemorrhoids
he said he can fill this thread to limit with menchmarks amd wins, not that amd wins 100% of benchmarks

so 101c is absolutely fine, intelfags everyone

Attached: 9900k has worse overclocking than ryzen.png (1327x1222, 69K)

Attached: 1562960586095.png (717x989, 59K)

Imagine being a disesed intel monkey.

Attached: 1562960808984.png (650x450, 43K)

>22 ambient
bullshit, the poozens that benchmarked it don't have AC and it's hot in india

Hey, amd fans, i heard you got cucked with pci-lanes.
Explain yourself please.
I was planing to switch for zen 2.

cope

Attached: 1562960871142.png (650x450, 43K)

Attached: 1562960932110.png (650x450, 41K)

>so 101c is absolutely fine, intelfags everyone
>intelfags
You're just making shit up at this point.

>Some autist curates 20+ different benchmarks showing AMD's
>It's actually impressive someone took time to do it
>Point out issues with a whopping two (2) of them
>hurr ur an intelfag facts don't matter
>After I already mentioned I don't plan on buying another Intel CPU anytime soon

Attached: 1562960992871.png (650x450, 43K)

>70 posts
>22 unique posters

Imagine posting 50 times in the same thread just to spam a bunch of debunked benchmarks

Cope

The fact is intels mainstream flagship is a overheating pozzed housefire

Attached: 1562961056093.png (650x450, 35K)

It's the containment thread for the mentally BTFO'd

>The benchmark autist is also the "Intel is pozzed" poster
Huh

bro if all you do is 100% gaming i9-9900k makes sense.
If you do literally anything (streaming, compiling, video rendering, basically anything other than gaming) else R9-3900x makes sense.

Stop fucking fanboying. Everyone knows this is how it goes, also nobody gives a fuck about framerates higher than refreshrates. both of those are equal because the fastest monitors are only 240Hz with common HFR being 120~144Hz.

Imagine caring so much shlomo

Attached: 1540252936915.png (600x636, 393K)

Really bad samefag detection

Attached: 1562961119738.jpg (2209x1328, 353K)

Attached: 1562961181371.jpg (1704x994, 104K)

This isn't the way to treat your Threadripper customers? I own a 1950x. It can handle 65C at most. My i5 ThinkPad can handle 90C+. Different CPUs can handle different temperature levels.

Attached: 1562961244145.jpg (1714x990, 105K)

I can't take it anymore
Make it stop, please intelbros

Attached: download.png (188x268, 9K)

Attached: 1562961305450.jpg (1199x696, 68K)

Attached: chrome_1xpoxSWba2.png (1227x605, 269K)

Im not even through half of my AMD benchmark folder

Attached: chrome_0SQKbLkhae.png (610x453, 119K)

If a CPU goes through frequent heating and cooling cycles, will it wear out faster?

Attached: chrome_4UgPg1uLoc.png (1210x607, 240K)

Attached: chrome_8KuapVxBM9.png (636x449, 84K)

>Year of our Lord 2011+7+1
>Gaming

The thermal paste might. But the CPU itself? I've never heard of any CPU wearing out.

intelfags will never learn

Attached: chrome_BKhfwbkGKo.png (630x455, 79K)

well all the pro autists want max FPS, so they get a 9900K (also 500$) and OC it to 5.2ghz w/ 600$ worth of watercooling hardware

Attached: chrome_bni2i84Zx9.png (629x448, 78K)

> will it wear out faster?
You might as well don't use it all. That way it sure will last.

Lol no, I'm the pozzed poster you're looking for. But this guy is based as fuck.

Attached: 1536694146733.png (1200x800, 164K)

what ever helps you sleep at night, AMD gerts better frames in CSGO

Attached: chrome_c9gCXbnH78.png (628x457, 86K)

Attached: chrome_ceiAGOmxmB.png (1227x604, 419K)