Explain this shit, Linuxfags

>uninstall yourself
apt purge yourself

windows fag

debian
or just install arch and set it up yourself

Install Ubuntu. Manjaro breaks on updates, it's just the Arch way.

Attached: 1461119117768.jpg (1024x768, 398K)

rpm -qlp yourself

Ubuntu fag

> tabs
> navbar
> title bar
> start menu
> taskbar

do yourself a favor and just sudo rm -rf / --no-preserve-root

huehueuue

you think i have sudo installed on my system

Attached: 904a8e9899.jpg (1200x863, 208K)

>recommending arch

Attached: 1561803962839.png (1000x922, 944K)

Arch is for people that want upvotes

Am I the only one that uses the fucking power button on my computer to initiate shutdown?

Yes, that's fucking abnormal.

oh i can do that to based boi

Attached: Screenshot_20190801_222615.png (1600x900, 287K)

>Queens Legacy.exe
nice

I always "sudo shutdown now" because it works on every system I touch

except for this fucker's debian install because he wanted to be spechull su -
shutdown now

su -
Password:

good luck

Attached: giphy.gif (480x270, 2.37M)

menjaro breaking on updates has nothing to do with arch

sudo shutdown now
Password:

You can't use sudo without a password either, you pedantic fuck.

The problem here is GNOME

and this is why i dont even understand the purpose of sudo???

Attached: tumblr_m4wqgofzSa1rs1aa4o4_500.gif (500x500, 11K)

I can never understand why some people have the need to overcomplicate stuff

Convenience.

>Convenience.
still prompted to input root password?

>it's just the Arch way
No, breaking us NOT the Arch way.
Manjaro is the one who breaks stuff by not doing what arch does.

>what is /etc/sudoers and ALL:NOPASSWD
Not sure if it was like that, but sudo does have option to disable password requests

you know that you can change gtk themes in kde settings too?

>su -
>Password:
>command

>sudo command
>Password:

see the difference?
There's really no reason other than convenience though.

No.

thx kde bro. i don't know why i never experimented with that setting.

yes. i see the difference the first looks more secure.

Based. Nothing is more pretentious than archfags.

At least Debian bros and Ubuntu bros can respect each other's OS for actually working.

> looks
yeah, looks, brainlet.

This. 100x this.

sudo prompt for user password, su - prompts for root password. i guess it depends on if you use a more complex root password versus user password.

and why wouldn't you use a more complex root password compared to user password?

You forgot to install candy crush in Linux

>uses edge

Install Gentoo and emerge -C app-incel/yourself

ok

Attached: hibergnation.png (596x388, 61K)

yeah, unnecessarily running every command under su is definitely the appropriate approach, sure dude
you can allow different groups and users PASSWD and NOPASSWD access to different commands
IIRC they also get logged as being executed by that user in some places rather than root which makes auditing easier on a multi-admin setup like a server
it's standard practice on any kind of serious setup as far as i know

you consider a thinkpad with one user running debian to watch anime and shit post on 4chin a serious setup?

Attached: b94.gif (500x281, 2.27M)

What does everything need to have fucking gigantic buttons now days?

i made two separate replies, one was about serious setups, one was about unnecessarily running commands under root the other was about sudo benefits generally
even if your setup is worthless to hack, that's not a reason to be smug about your shitty security. sure it might not be problematic strictly speaking but it isn't impressive or cool either so why present it that way? unless you're delusional about su being more "correct" than sudo which is exactly what i assumed
but now i am enlightened and understand that you're just lazy

just reload plasma, happens every week or so
And don't pretend windows doesn't have these shitty glitches.
use alt+space and type "plasmashell --replace" the next time this happens just type pla and it well auto complete, unlike the shitty windows search system

so your saying that sudo does not increase your attack area, especially when NOPASSWD is used?

oh, i wouldn't use NOPASSWD for anything except shutdown and even then on certain systems, it's more of a convenience feature than a security feature
generally, i think sudo can allow admins to essentially disable root, and parcel out permissions to lower level accounts which eases auditing and management though increases attack surface in terms of raw area
obviously there are a bunch of exploits and sudo is no substitute for MAC but it's still a step in the right direction

>explain this
You don't like stuff, but are too stupid to change or fix it.
What's my prize?

Attached: 1559149521096.jpg (640x733, 79K)

>root password
no your own

That's KDE

Works on my machine. I'm using Arch btw.

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-02 14-51-55.jpg (1067x983, 134K)