I support their decision

I support their decision.

Attached: 1565010090107.jpg (371x136, 5K)

They're a private organisation, and it's a free market thing. Get over it.

I SAID I SUPPORT THEIR DECISION

Get over it.

Gotta play dirty to take out the competition, eh?
rank2traffic.com/Jow Forums.org
rank2traffic.com/8*h.net
Thankfully it is not quite the virtual monopoly like YT or Twitter, so you win this time.

>fuck yes, corporate sex dungeons and private gulags

Attached: 1545681555774.png (645x729, 34K)

>corporate sex dungeons and private gulags
.... I'm listening.

>a free market thing
If that were true we wouldn't see coordinated efforts where people are simultaneously banned from services, deplatformed/demonitized, and barred from banking and financial services all within 24 hours. Not to mention that they work with governments and have exclusive contracts.

They are part of a cartel, a syndicate, a trust.
They are not a free market.

Y'ALL ARE DUMB YOU DON'T GET IT
I SUPPORT THEIR DECISION
I SUPPORT THEIR DECISION
AnanananananaAaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH
argh argh
AAAAAAAANANANANANANAAAAAH
AAANANANANA
AAAAAAGGGGGGGHHHHHH

Attached: 8D2E4570-5B96-42C8-A5AD-1DD10A16A274.jpg (300x300, 13K)

>If that were true we wouldn't see coordinated efforts where people are simultaneously banned from services, deplatformed/demonitized, and barred from banking and financial services all within 24 hours.
that's still the free market if the market happens to shift in that direction. especially with cultural shifts, like the one we've been seeing throughout the 2010s (not political or governmental -- cultural).

DORORORODODO
HOHOHO
DOREEEEEWEEEEEREWWW
EEEEEERW

Attached: 1565011276879.jpg (30x30, 688)

One word: Free speech

Fuck you. Do you support the free market if it means I can ban your ass forever? No, free market shouldn't be censoring

Are you dumb and dont get it?
Get over it.

it's the free market up to the point where the government condones it, or sponsors it.

We have laws against this sort of thing. It's called antitrust. And it exists for many good reasons, which apply in this case.

Antitrust laws are commonly seen as the opposite of free marketism.

which only applies to public matters. not private ones like businesses and the service they provide.

the free market does censor if it calls for that. businesses are free to censor anything on their platforms.

breaking up companies that collude to manipulate the market isn't the opposite of free marketism

Market manipulation is (sadly) part of the free market. Any attempts to alleviate it would be going against the concept of a free market unfortunately.

>a market that is not free and is actually totally controlled by a small group of organizations is the free market
literally no

>rank2traffic.com/Jow Forums.org
What happened in January 16, 2018?

Breaking up companies for their business practises is encroaching on the very concept of a free and open market. Market manipulation is a bullshit excuse, and the unfortunate side effect of a free and open market. You need regulated markets, laws restricting freedom of business, to get rid of "manipulation." And you're only going to find that leftist shitholes that suppresses people's freedoms.

and in places that don't prosecute for antitrust you will find markets that are absolutely not free where the big players force prices to be arbitrarily high just because they can, and the economy goes tits up because the government doesn't care

... That is free market capitalism, user. Not whatever socialist ideals you pulled out of your ass.
>and the economy goes tits up because the government doesn't care
Government involvement is always the opposite of free marketism.

I agree.
It's a free market and switching providers is easy.

8ch should already be up right now with their new provider.
It's literally a non-problem.

Attached: 1564996646208.png (590x233, 22K)

>free market
>customers have no choice of who to buy from because all the sellers have colluded
>free market
literally no and go back to Jow Forums

I would support them if they actually put their mouth where their money is and do the same to Jow Forums.

I support the rights of private corporations but I do not believe their marketing bullshit. This is obviously not about antisemitism, at all.

i'd rather the government get involved at all.

go back to sweden

Jow Forums is next.

Server instability and loss of interest after the site made the news regularly in the year prior.

fpbp

governments wouldn't need to be involved if companies didn't collude and steal from customers

Lmao, we are going after trumptards next.

Attached: 1564671894402.jpg (1125x1208, 762K)

You're only forcing your opposition underground in a idiotic game of Whack-A-Mole.

Same, corporations should be free to choose their customers
Exactly

>What is PR
Truly baffling why companies would make the decision to distance themselves from some people or ideologies.

Spoken like a true socialist.

That only happens in a heavily cartelized market where newcomers are barred from entering it? Now why and how does that happen?

Are we dealing with a Distributor or a public space here? That's a very important distinction.

What PR?
It's not like normies or "journalists" could make the connection between infinity chan and what's basically a DDOS protection provider.
That's not PR, that's virtue signaling to further a more global agenda

>barred from entering it.
Fixed.

If you go against the grain, and defy globohomo, people can choose not to do business with you. If I tell some fag I don’t want to bake their stupid cake, the state will force me to.

>Are we dealing with a Distributor or a public space here?
Cloudflare is big and popular, but it's nowhere near the only one so I would say no. You can choose to use a different service.
>What PR?
Public relations, really interesting thing you should check it out. Also trying to avoid negative PR isn't the only factor, companies actively seek to get good PR, which this is.
>That's not PR, that's virtue signaling
What's the difference? Virtue signaling is PR

It's a free market yet it seems they're willing to hurt their profits short-term by embargoing certain groups of paying costumers to satisfy the interests of another group. That's…weird.

Dilate

I had a big long post about why they are retarded all typed up, but apparently Jow Forums thinks I am spam, so suffice it to say, they're retarded.

A likely story

Yes, . But it seems like people in this thread are arguing about the entire situation with big tech companies.

Should be the same
>globohomo
not sure what this is but sounds hilarious
Cool
I'd say situations where you actually don't have a choice for whatever reason would be different, like government website where you had to do something. Banning from there would be ridiculous.

Sounds based, GTFO low IQ normie.

yet they do business with montansanto, blackwater, etc.

>That's not PR, that's virtue signaling
virtue signaling is a type of pr -_-

user, it's only bad PR if the propaganda media talks about it.
If the TV doesn't talk about it then it doesn't exist.

>I'd say situations where you actually don't have a choice for whatever reason would be different, like government website where you had to do something. Banning from there would be ridiculous.
Reminds me of teen.gov

oh, the cabal extends to the media as well

shit's fucked, breh

The most vocal proponents of these embargoes aren't exactly for their economic power or their overwhelming majority, if anything most of them are journalists for some 3rd-rate e-tabloid or the like. Yet they're willing to sabotage their platform with less-than-perfect algorithms stifling anything other than braindead, vain content.

>It's a free market and switching providers is easy.
What service was cloudflare providing them?

I support it because it's funny to me.

The same DNS and servering Jow Forums uses.

Can somebody remind me why we should care about infinity chan?

omg terrible i will vote trump now :((((

People aren't outraged enough about that to make it a good business decision to sever ties, I guess. I doubt Cloudflare had much to gain from having 8c*an as a client and much to gain in good PR from severing ties. Pretty simple, really.

>hurr only socialists don't want to be robbed
return to Jow Forums faggot

If they shut down permanently (which the tweet from the supposed admin suggests WON'T happen), they would flood this site.

…or when a certain company has such an overwhelming dominance over a certain market, say, crowdsourced streaming services, that it becomes synonym with the industry it's supposed to compete in colloquial lingo. This is much more tangible than the example you've provided.

>People aren't outraged enough
the outrage is manufactured
without CNN and the grievance media to lead sheeple, they wouldn't even know cloudflare exists.

/cuteboys/ is down, without boypussy my life is meaningless

*crowdsourced on-demand streaming services

>they would flood this site
Bur that would be a good thing. It would mean a part of the old Jow Forums is coming back home. I'd take them any day over the 2016 Redditors

Wait what's going on? What decision was made?

Attached: 1562245470135.png (555x439, 441K)

Infinitychan has one of the best hentai boards on the internet. The ramifications of losing that will be fucking awful.

They're nothing like the old 4channers.

It's also questionable if it's the same situation.
Well as far as any outrage is manufactured. And I don't think people were outraged about Cloudflare, so you might be thinking this a bit wrong. People were outraged about the situation over mass shootings, those were connected 8c*an and Cloudflare, who were doing business with 8c*an saw an opportunity for good PR without having to do much at all in order to achieve that. Public didn't need to know about Cloudflare's connection to 8c*an, Cloudflare publicized it themself and since the interest around this whole thing is high, it's being reported.

I visited eight-ch and the templeos board on Saturday, and now it is gone? That is not fair.

it's almost like 3 significant events relevant to the sites that could damage connected service's reputation happened in the last 48 hours... hMMMMM

Attached: FB14C0D8-F09F-4158-AF6F-BD75A1BE1408.png (173x141, 4K)

People are only outraged about mass shootings when they just happened and it makes them look good on Twitter

I wholeheartedly supported them when they kicked the daily stormer. But 8ch??
Do they even understand what type of site that is?
Technically speaking, wasn't there a way for them to just not service their Jow Forums-type boards instead of the whole website that has countless communities not dedicated to hate?
I can't get behind them this time, this is fucked up.

why are your politicians so vehemently opposed to anti-trust legislation and action then?

No, It wouldn't. Jow Forums is technically inferior to 8c* and its staff is too complacent and incompetent to properly respond to swarms of outgroups like the 2016 Ledditors you've mentioned.

What's a good alternative to 1.1.1.1?

Because their electoral campaigns are funded by big corporations?
Muh democracy

so vote for grassroots politicians and electoral reform instead of the party that blocks election security legislation from even being voted on

and Cloudflare needs to be eternally reminded by these decisions, even if the company goes under in decades from now, even if everyone involved retires, if anyone they have trained/worked for that company, remind them.

"remember that time you were complete and utter faggots?"

how the fuck do you remove monopolistic control from these companies?

Cloudflare basically runs the entire western world's internet service

I am interested in why you wholeheartedly supported that.

Run a small, but dependable service.
Slowly build investors over time via Patreon/other crowdfunding
Keep delivering
Scale
You win, but then the jew buys you out, and the cycle repeats.

thats the point of ((( their ))) mental psyops, to offer a choice so that u cant rebute it, but the choice really isnt there, they control 99% of whatever you are considering moving from. they will use every dirty tactic there is to grow bigger and bigger while destroying their competition

Attached: DemocracyIsASham.jpg (1124x1238, 349K)

Tough luck. It's back up already. They're more likely to go to their sister site 5ch than this shithole

The daily stormer was a honeypot to attract normies larping as far-right and bainlets spewing memes and make money out of them.

The problem is that governmental controls favors monopolies as opposed to singular businesses

Unless I like in the Ukraine or Moldova or Russia I'll get shut down the moment I hit anywhere close to being bigger than a small business

You won't get that far before you are faced with the dilemma of either bending out and dancing to their tune or getting embargoes by Patreon or banking services or whatever.

you had to actively search for it though, it's not like DS was the new york times.com or something

*Bending down

>America has FreeSpeechTM

Not anymore huh?

Attached: 1562009064551.jpg (480x480, 18K)

>free speech is companies being forbidden by the government to turn down any customer

Attached: slowpoke.gif (496x258, 1.38M)

bake that cake

Simply because that site was entirely dedicated to hate. If I were a business I also wouldn't want to be mixed up with that.
But I guess the slippery slope actually happened now.

>like we give a flying fuck that you support or not their decision
Get over it

You mean the same companies that act as public utilities and shut down any competition?

Why are laws against monopolies not accounted for anytime this argument is brought up?