I've been rocking an i5 2500k for nearly 9 years now and I'm not feeling any need to upgrade...

I've been rocking an i5 2500k for nearly 9 years now and I'm not feeling any need to upgrade. Realistic how much more lifespan can I expect out of a 9 year old CPU that hasn't been overclocked?

Attached: Intel-Core-i5-2500K.jpg (240x180, 10K)

Depends on your motherboard.

Just get a i9-9900k already poorfag

How many of the 30+ BIOS/windows security mitigations do you have installed and fully enabled?

I use 40$ thinkpad

None

lmao

Attached: 1438714549462.png (520x533, 283K)

ITT corelet cope

Attached: 1544989814656.png (914x678, 191K)

>using windows on thinkpads

Reminder there has not been one single instance of a CPU vulnerability caught in the wild. Stop this meme.

3950X will be the best mainstream CPU ever

Attached: w.jpg (1003x700, 198K)

More intelpoor cope in September

Attached: Ryzen7-3950X-CPU.jpg (2419x878, 280K)

Of you just OC it it will be fine for another couple years since you don't have standards anyway apparently.

What's with the "corelet" chart if the 3700X and 3800X are only 8c/16t?

AMD has the 3900x and the 3950x is underway.

Depends on programs you use specifically on your PC. 4c/4t is enough for normie shit like facebook and youtube.

>2500k
lmaoing at you threadlets from my 2700k

I need to upgrade my CPU soon (i5-4790K).
Haven't kept updated on CPU game in the last 5 years, but it seems like the best value is from AMD atm.

I'm between Ryzen 2600x and i5-9400f, strictly for 1080p gaming.

Is there a new generation right around the corner, or is there some obvious gaming CPU out there I should go for on black friday?

There is hardly any excuse

I'm about to get a 590X quality mobo with a 3950X, with a pcie 4.0 2tb ssd, a 4k 144hz monitor and a 5900xt if its better than the 2080ti otherwise a 2080ti. All of this while being on welfare living with my pops. Spend a little money big guy.

Attached: djx65r.jpg (500x541, 57K)

TOo bad I'm too poor to ever get a girl like her

r5 3600

i7 2600 non-k still good

Good thing you admitted it. But seriously, no one is defending anything - these vulnerabilities are simply on the verge of being impossible to exploit.

same but 2600k

2600K here hehe

Yeah, there wasn't much progress concerning desktop CPUs. You have these mostly server and workstation CPUs with obscene core counts, but with even my dual Xeon I sometimes struggle to put them to good use. A lot of consumer grade software simply does not use all that power. Adobe, we look in your direction.

> Realistic how much more lifespan can I expect out of a 9 year old CPU that hasn't been overclocked?

...i am running a machine with a 2500k and i expect this machine will be running until the cpu, mother board dies, i love this cpu, tick tock shit .... but next will be amd stuff!!

Attached: computerinder2.jpg (395x296, 20K)

>i9-9900k

Attached: 1497234855045.png (500x313, 161K)

Most programs are not even multi-threaded and more cores means less clock.

Attached: 1563005081713.jpg (2560x1440, 237K)

you'd have better results with 3600mhz ram.

I'm ready to upgrade mine once I stop being broke

Attached: Screenshot (17).png (1414x960, 1.15M)

it wouldn't do shit

another 9 years if the mobo doesn t die before. my 2600k has been OC since 2012 to 4.6 ghz and today in 2019 can t handle more than 4.2 ghz at 1.38v. but still works .

Nice fucking job Jow Forums.
35 replies, maybe one or two that actually try to answer the OP, the rest is Indian shills discussing amd vs intel as if there weren't 20 other threads for that.

welcome to Jow Forums

More corelet cope

lol looser scamed by intel

Attached: UPGRADE2010.png (836x768, 17K)