> Uses 4 chan to complain about google and android

Jow Forums is secure on iOS.....I guess anjeets really just don’t care about actual security....

Attached: 5BFBDE82-A669-47FF-8C68-F65DD488CD53.jpg (1242x1438, 638K)

this is android using the samsung browser. Looks like it's just idiots using chrome on android.

I remind you that this website handles the traffic of porn users and users who value anonimity

that doesn't really make sense
you can't just post *anything* related to technology

If anyone gives a fuck, they should be sure they're using HTTPS then huh?

Wtf is samsung's browser, it's chrome of course.

Then why the fuck does the samsung browser use HTTPS on Jow Forums by default and Chrome doesn't?

>http://

Why are any of you here doxxing yourself like a fucking idiot? That's literally what the warning is for. This is a fucking anonymous website.

Attached: 1547442105381.png (383x364, 139K)

Imaging living in this bubble, most Jow Forums users don't know or care about https and encryption

Not sure, in a sense both Jow Forums and google failed to secure LOTS of connections safe. But one only thinks of google's role in securing this connection because of the high expectations we place on them, Google has to secure more than half of the world's end user connections, Jow Forums only has to secure theirs.

Some (unsatisfactory) explanations as to why https can't be the default if both protocols are available.
ttps://security.stackexchange.com/questions/81801/why-do-browsers-default-to-http-and-not-https-for-typed-in-urls

>not using the https version of Jow Forums
>completely ignoring goolag's business of surveillance

Attached: 1519968183750.gif (540x540, 279K)

Switch to Firefox, dumbasses.

connect through https then you fucking retard.

retard.

Attached: https.png (487x434, 22K)

Firefox defaults to http for typed in urls as well.

All Jow Forums has to do is redirect http connections to https, why do you have such a hard time condemning bad security implementations?

Here's another explanation as to why https cannot be the default protocol:

security.stackexchange.com/questions/4369/why-is-https-not-the-default-protocol

Attached: New Project(3).png (1000x400, 16K)

>he doesn't use https everywhere
Also,
>Answer in 2011 where the internet which is outdated

We'll stay here all night moving goalposts since OP didn't specify what he meant
At no point I excused Jow Forums's behaviour or said that I support them keeping http as the default, just that calling google "good guys" for reminding users of chrome, which is just another botnet, is retarded giving that their actions as a whole are much worse for anyone concerned about security and privacy, but I don't expect you to agree with me
Yes, Jow Forums is retarded by still using http, and yes google is braindead for everything else it does

I'll take this slightly positive comment as my leave.

Don't use software that you wouldn't recommend to your non-technical friends. Don't use software that only respects your privacy if you know the secret incantations.

Good bye.

In other words, don't use anything related to google.

Kys brainless gook tranny

Retards who are against https redirect are complete fucking utter subhumans.

Type 's' to pay respects

You sound like someone who uses public toilets and expects everybody else who uses it to wipe the toilet seat, even though you yourself won't.

Look at the settings
Http is to keep compadibility

>Http is to keep compadibility
What the fuck are you talking about? That doesn't even make sense. Please, tell me what doesn't support ssl?

Internet explorer and any old system.
Dont forget this site has regular visitors from shitholes like africa
we had a thread with a guy from such a shithole a while ago

You're fucking retarded

Attached: internet explorer.png (2178x1295, 166K)

Who said i was talking about newer versions

>Internet explorer AND any old system
>AND
way to move the goal post retard
older versions support https anyways

>Certificates are not free, since the point of certificates is that they involve physical identification of the certificate owner by the CA (I am not telling that commercial CA price their certificates fairly; but even the fairest of CA, operated by the Buddha himself, would still have to charge a fee for a certificate). Commercial CA would just love HTTPS to be "the default".
>letsencrypt is run by a being of pure generosity to transcend even buddha

Yeah good luck with that
Also i talked about shitholes like africa so your standards should immediately fall to xp and older tier.

By that logic, you should be shitting on Google for not implementing https everywhere by default, right?

Nah, you're retarded if you think Jow Forums defaults to http for compatibility reasons and is catering to Africa.

Feels good to be a bravebull.

Attached: blocks.png (531x171, 62K)

I guess you're new here

Attached: Annotation 2019-08-10 165703.png (646x288, 33K)

>bravebull
The absolute state of delusion brave shills live in.