how can the object oriented programming be bad if the creator of C++ himself uses and likes it?
How can the object oriented programming be bad if the creator of C++ himself uses and likes it?
Juan Reed
Other urls found in this thread:
Aaron Clark
oop is very good who said it's bad? ill get the bois on this
Angel Hill
bump
Elijah Hernandez
>Oop
>Bad
No one who isn't baiting says this. This mostly seems like a straw man thread for a situation which almost never occurs.
Levi Hall
bump
Jaxon Robinson
Enjoy your overhead and side-effects oopsies
Isaac Sanchez
>who said it's bad?
This guy:
youtube.com
Luke Bennett
Ah I get it.
This entire thread is you begging for an arbitrary argument on the internet because you're desperate for anything approaching human interaction, so desperate that you had to bump it twice.
Fix yourself man.
Carter Miller
you wish
Jason Rogers
is it even possible to encapsulate mutable states outside of OOP?
Josiah Howard
yes
LISP is pretty good at it too
Also any database
Eli Ross
It's just C++ that's a monstrosity under the hood. Smalltalk is more purer of an OOP
Samuel Morgan
How can oop be trash when the king of trash software likes it?
Matthew Scott
I was programming POO for many years and finally stopped about half a year ago because it really sucks, it's a capitalist bullshit. Going back to C was the best decision in my programming life. Yes, you may be forced to use and learn C++ by your "job" or whatever, but objectively it just sucks balls.
Juan Allen
for a person that doesn't know anything about C and C++ could you explain the difference?
I always thought that Cpp is just C with extra things to make life easier
Lucas Taylor
OOP is a tool, it is good for what it's good for.
Aiden Jackson
OOP itself isn't bad. It has a bad rep because people doing the needful think it's important to use it as much as they can wherever possible.
I remember this video.
>It's bad because it *might* be used badly.
Such a shitty argument.
Chase Williams
>Object oriented
>Programming
Choose one.
Xavier Russell
Why do people think you have to choose only one paradigm?
Jaxson Allen
Many things, it's difficult to sum up to an outsider, but basically it is 99% unnecessary and the extra things just bring extra burden and trouble, in many ways, like more ways for people to be inconsistent, arising unforeseen antipatterns, extra mental burden, more complicated and bloated specifications and compilers and tools that process the source code and so on. While you can do completely without it just fine. In programming minimalism is one of the most important things.
Xavier Roberts
> be
> want to learn c++
> cant wrap head around simple idioms like move semantics & RAII
> "c++ is 99% unnecessary and the extra things just bring extra burden and trouble, in many ways, like more ways for people to be inconsistent, arising unforeseen antipatterns, extra mental burden, more complicated and bloated specifications"