is Jow Forums a gcc or a clang board?
Is Jow Forums a gcc or a clang board?
Eli Martin
Other urls found in this thread:
software.intel.com
twitter.com
Jackson Rivera
It's a JVM board, retard
Asher Nelson
that and clang.
Liam Butler
That dragon looks way cooler than a gay ass goat
Andrew Davis
>clang
Reminder not to use compilers with cucked licenses.
Colton James
indians are not allowed on this boards
Kevin Richardson
>compilers
this is an interpreter board reeee
Anthony Richardson
Jow Forums compiler collection
Levi Howard
msvc, llvm, icc, tcc
>gcc
Justin Wright
what's wrong with gcc?
Samuel Jackson
>gcc
>no multithread because stallman is retard
>shitton of questionable design decision like using global variables extensively because stallman is retard
LMAO
Jayden Evans
For me, it's icc.
Leo Baker
how do you prefer your interpreter compiled? python3 on debian is compiled with gcc 8
Blake King
>paying for software in 2019
Isaiah Fisher
>employer pays for floating licenses
sorry bro seems like a (you) problem
Brayden Foster
We use the compiler made by the bearded guy in the sticky
Dylan Kelly
no, i only use interpreted interpreters
Angel Bennett
JIT > AOT, so llvm I guess
Dominic Hill
>This
JVM FTW!
Oliver Perry
Imagine being a nu-coder and shit talking Stallman. He's pretty much the OG of MIT programmers, widely famous during his time in the academia aside from pretty much coding the entirety of GNU from scratch.
>but muh global variables! aren't they evil???
If Stallman says something is fine, it's fine. You should stop listening to the wisdom of basedboy webdevs/evangelists.
Brody Morris
why is hurd such failure?
Anthony Reyes
What happend to the deprecated meme? I remember seeing it posted a lot here and then it just stopped.
Josiah Carter
it was one guy posting it every day and he got bored and moved on
Samuel Wilson
it's free if used for open source software
software.intel.com
Jordan Baker
ye its like goto, who gives a shit if it works for you and it doesn't transform your code into spagetti nightmare its just fine
Isaac Thomas
based and redpilled sir
William Thompson
clang is getting better and better. I remember when a parser for a super complicated format that I wrote got 15% faster when I switched to clang from gcc. but gcc is probably still king overall.
Jace Cooper
I've mostly been using gcc but I'm leaning towards clang lately, mostly because of superior tooling (c/c++ language servers use clang, it has an autoformatter, etc.).
When I'm writing something quick and dirty with no makefile or anything, I will often still use gcc because of habits.
Kevin Hernandez
For me is the Borland C compiler. The seamless integration with Borland Turbo C IDE really makes it the best
Nolan Torres
based chad