>buy inlel
>vulnerability patch comes out
>enjoy your 40% reduced performance
>buy AMD
>everything is blazing fast
Why do people still buy intel when it's common knowledge that it's a subpar product at a premium price?
Buy inlel
Liam Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
Aiden Mitchell
because AMD boards don't post if you look at them wrong
Noah Martinez
>buy AMD
>fall for market push
>repeat the mantra of "oh no Intel's CPUs can literally only operate at 1% of their original performance now"
Caleb Edwards
Vulnerabilities don't matter
Benjamin Cook
>this kills the israeli
youtube.com
Kevin Perry
I'm sure you meant
>buy AMD
>computer can't boot
>cpu uses more power when idling than when computing
Zachary Thomas
>cpu uses more power when idling than when computing
When has this ever happened?
Aaron Butler
Who are you quoting?
Christian Wilson
how do higher idling temp/power usage manter when they're well within operational?
what about intels 200W+ required to match performance under load, greatest ally?
Grayson Jackson
right now in intcel's delusional minds
Evan White
duckduck a DB benchmark for xeon vs epic, change your mind according the information you have acquired.
Easton Jones
>buy inlel
>vulnerability patch comes out
>enjoy your 40% reduced performance
>buy AMD
>spend the next three years talking about how great your hardware will be when they finally fix those firmware bugs.
Wyatt Nguyen
Parker Cruz
All those corporate partners buying into data center gear are not going to put up with day one broken beta firmware like you ballwashers.
Easton Hernandez
>Why do people still buy intel
gee I dunno, maybe because even their low end chips outperform amd flagships overclocked
Justin Nelson
Honestly Most people aren't going to patch those vulnerabilities unless forced.
You're average computer user probably doesn't even know they exist, they likely already have malware all over their PC and meltdown/spectre is the least of their worries.
The big leagues are controlled by software vendors largely and unless they want to start supporting EPYC as well I don't think it's going to matter anyway. Most software vendors try to limit what they have to support to keep testing simple. AMD will need to prove themselves to not once again be a one-hit wonder and keep up the performance for a good number of years before majority of people start supporting it.
Gabriel Clark
>only 10 games
>several of which favor Intel
>at 1080p
Is there a version of this which actually attempts to be comprehensive?
Alexander Martin
mac os and windows both pushed updates that included patches that reduced performance what fucking planet are you on
Jackson Hughes
>inlel
kek
Kevin Fisher
>i-i-it doesn't count
lmao
Brandon Hill
AC Odyssey, Siege, BFV, All support multi threading,on top of that most of the games selected are competitive online games where FPS matter the most.
>b-but muh secrit conspiracy
>w-why not create a GPU bottleneck
keep up the coping
Elijah Stewart
wow only good game of zen2 is cs go a 9year old game which resident in (((gamecache))) because its so small.
Benjamin Perry
Why do you automatically assume I'm defending something, as if I have a personal attachment to a fucking CPU brand? I'm just saying that with a single resolution and a tiny sample of games it's a shitty benchmark.
Aiden Carter
back to r*ddit, newfag
Luke Parker
Isnt Ryzen broken on Windows 1903?
Something about a scheduling bug
Nathaniel King
Reminder to thank every AMDdrone for beta testing Zen 2 for us.
Landon Martinez
why buy new hardware if u put windows on it
Jordan Moore
>"H" for Hitler
lmao