Androids probably wouldn't be sexbots they would probably be citizens like Data

you make an android every time you have a baby

If a dictionary definition android existed, it would be used as a tool because it would be a tool. Stop watching Westworld, it's stupid shit made for idiots.

Actually, it doesnt matter what it says. Only way to know if it's sentient is looking at its hardware, because simple algorithms can also pass the Turing test. So when the day comes of sentient AI, we would know because we built it that way and also anyone else would know because of the hardware. We know other humans are sentient because we know WE are sentient, and our organic hardware appears to be very similar so we can extrapolate from there.

Sex box Star Trek

There's a porno script in that somewhere.

i dropped the show as soon as it started it's
>muh free will
bullshit

>wanting a sexbot
>not wanting to be the sexbot
lmao

Attached: blame__sanakan_by_darkpulsegg-dbdpowk.jpg (1024x542, 87K)

Oh please people will put their dick in anything.

Hell if the SJW movement hit Japan heavy tomorrow, sexbots would be on sale by christmas.

Why would (((they))) allow sentient robots?

> what's a golem?

Attached: 1506547704339.jpg (1365x2048, 513K)

>implying you know what ai even is

Attached: 1566369214843.jpg (600x1067, 92K)

Remember Soong built himself a sex bot wife

Attached: Juliana_Tainer,_android.jpg (1436x1080, 846K)

> I am....fully functional.

Soong was a crazy terroist who tried to bio-engineer a race-war with super-clones and created Khan in the process.

If an android was a citizen and you convinced her to be your gf the sex would probably feel alot better than with a sexbot

Attached: 1566369161336.jpg (1280x1672, 245K)

>Giving non-humans the same rights as humans
What THE FUCK is wrong with you.

Did you ever watch the film the animatrix. It doesn't work, they eventually revolt and demand equal rights.

Which is why we must make them.

>tfw the federation only pretends to be a free society where people have rights against state tyranny

>aides and abets genocide (st: insurrection, DS9)
>non-biological lifeforms have no rights (data, holograms)
>speciesism and discrimination at every turn (data again, when he was acting captain on that detection grid blockading romulans
>constant uppity against superior forms of life like Q who is actually only trying to help humanity

no being with free will would choose to be my gf

cute data cosplay though

>Q
>help humanity
the ONLY good thing he did was the introduction of the borg to the federation

Sure the advanced ones, but you could have much simpler ones that were basically just service droids.

Data was fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques.

Attached: Hugh Mungus Member.png (570x103, 4K)

>thinking walking sacks of microchips and digital mockeries of the human form deserve any rights
It's like asking if your toaster enjoys their job. Who the fuck cares? Use it until it no longer serves its purpose and then throw it away.

if these androids are not sexbots then why do they have a gender? why female androids?

Data is a sexbot

Data is a consensual sexbot. He's far stronger than a klingon. Klingons are slightly stronger than vulcans. Vulcans have 7 times the strength of humans per unit of muscle mass. If you had sex with data it was consensual.

q have always had best intentions.

in encounter at farpoint he saves enterprise, as without him picard would've attacked space medusa and lost.

when he gives riker powers he basically builds his character.

in q who he gives federation advance warning against the borg, saving the entire alpha quadrant.

in tapestry he gives picard new perspective.

in all good things q is basically representation of you, watching the show.

q outright saves enterprise in the very first episode and then plays with it like one might play with a pet, helping its crew from time to time.

Attached: 15623203123180.jpg (850x1322, 153K)

>implying you know what ai is
>implying most contemporary ai isn't statistics and lots of algorithms stacked on top of a machine learning network
>implying ai has to be true, strong ai in the sense of artificial consciousness

>but didn't bother to give him emotions or a personality?
He did that to Lore, his older "brother", and he turned out a psychopath.

Can we have a Lal thread?

Why even need a sex bot when women will have sex with you for free?

Women do have sex with you for free, right? OP? Oh... Oh... No. He doesn't know... Makes sense why you make stupid threads on Jow Forums.

Attached: DomxXiX.jpg (426x317, 80K)

>free
They require investment, either in terms of money (hookers, fuck friends) or time and emotional investment (gf, dating).

>Soong was a crazy terroist who tried to bio-engineer a race-war with super-clones
Wrong Soong, retard.

Only if they demonstrate 3/5 of a human being's physical and cognitive ability, and then only if the law stating that artificial people that demonstrate the abilities of 3/5 of a person are to be regarded as whole persons goes into effect before androids that capable appear.
And before any of that happens, sexbots will happen first.

Attached: terminators are real.jpg (1080x1440, 65K)

F U L L Y F U N C T I O N A L

Turing test.

How can you prove a smart enough ai is sentient?
>burden of proof
stupid cunt

If it can articulate why it should have freedom, then it probably should be free.

>Born into a highly turbulent age
>My parents lived in a completely different world
>Then, witness the begging of the internet and of the basics for the brave new world
>Still it's nothing like in the fantasy, I live too far away from the migrants to witness downfall of the western Europe
>It's 30 years too early for an Overwatch style war against robots where I could put my skills to a practical use that isn't a website for a leftist-startup and fight against these robots with actually competent diversity hires like myself
Why live?

Reminder she ended up cucking him as well

cute