Uh oh
Attached: 3A7DE076-00FE-40CD-827B-8DACD6420652.png (2732x2048, 1.91M)
Uh oh
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WE GOT TOO COCKY BROS
>better core utilization is the future.
I wish I had your faith, but I don't. If anything, its gonna get worse.
*Performance results may not reflect all publicly available security updates
it already started happening, quad cores are beginning to suffer in games (historically the most single threaded workloads there are)
>in 'Real World' benchmarks
And what are these benchmarks?
Based. People who buy AMD are either poorfags or shareholders. Gotta admit Ryzen 2 is pretty decent but Intel is still easily the better choice.
Stop samefagging, it's transparent. At least wait until there are a few more replies in your shitty bait so you have some sort of plausible deniability.
>getting this butthurt over the fact that Intel beats AMD on nearly all fronts
AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH
Poster count went up dumbass
Probably latency related benchmarks like click program, and program loads faster, or etc.
>Intel also used a real-world fluid simulation benchmark to showcase their IMC (Memory controller) performance. In this test, the Core i7-9700K finished the simulation in 15 minutes while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X took 17 minutes to complete.
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH
Everything they could find that prioritised single threaded performance, for their comparison of an 8 core CPU to a 12 core CPU. Hmm.
Eh, kinda hard to just trust a vendor's own results. I'm going to wait for Intel to contract Principled Technologies to publish some principled independent test results before I make up my mind.
>intel shill youtuber
fuck you for making me click that, dislike
How many extra jingles are in your pocket today?
>Manufacturer A says their newest products are better than Manufacturer B's latest products!
Like, does anyone put out a report and showcase saying: "Hey, we're slower and worse than the competitor. So, uhhhhh, yeah."
Of course Intel is going to say: "HEY, LOOK AT HOW MUCH FASTER OUR PRODUCTS ARE!" so people go buy them off the shelves in droves, because realistically, they're not targeting people with Ryzen 3000 series systems already, they're targeting people who are LOOKING at a upgrading from their older system to Ryzen 3000, and will see an improvement either way. Even if their non-engineering sample production scale chip doesn't edge out the 3000-series equivalent by the famed 4-5%, they literally won't notice, Intel will have their money, and all this self-masturbatory posturing will be moot.
man I love this CPU gen. These niggas are brutally competing and us the consumers do nothing but benefit from it.
Basically the opposite of what's happening with GPUs
>certified shit wrecker
>no security mitigations applied
oh neat a real-world fluid simulatio- OH WAIT WHAT IS THIS?
>And what are these benchmarks?
Carefully cherrypicked applications compiled in Intel's compiler.
>Gotta admit Ryzen 2 is pretty decent but Intel is still easily the better choice
Fuck off pajeet shill
>brutally competing
Intel is brutally marketing, nothing more.
How many times must we go through this?
This. Get your CPU fully patched first and then we can talk.
with or without security patches?
>wccftech
>our best new CPU is better than an entry level Ryzen
oh noes
intel has been forced to cut prices this year. If AMD didn't released something as good as memezen 3000 we'd still be paying 800 bucks for 8-core jewtel CPUs
>currytech
ok