Wait a minute

Wait a minute.
I thought AMD were more economical?

Attached: amd.png (752x465, 26K)

Other urls found in this thread:

cpubenchmark.net/cpu_value_available.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I thought they were better value for money?

Attached: amd2.png (754x531, 23K)

in cpu and midrange gpu

>compare 8 core to 12 core
hurr durr how come more power?

I thought they had better real-world performance?

Attached: amd3.png (758x464, 22K)

They don't have 50+ vulnerabilities and backdoors

Remind me what the price difference is.

Funny, because on the least GPU bottlenecked system, there's a virtual tie.

Attached: Screenshot_20190829-121807_Chrome.jpg (1174x698, 162K)

Well it's Linux. Wait until the nerds optimize it for Zen2.
I had a lot of issues on Linux with my 2200g when it came out but now everything's fine.

It is, buying an APU is based, anything else is cucked.

Most of these have mitigations. Even with the mitigations, Intel still manages to come out on top.
Negligible, even more so when you take into account their superior drivers and CPU features.
>Wait until the nerds optimize it for Zen2.
Drivers are committed to the kernel months/years in advance by the manufacturer. Individuals rarely touch them. Any optimisation to be done already has been.

>Even with the mitigations, Intel still manages to come out on top.
It seems like more of a tie based on

>7nm 12 core consumes singificantly more than 14nm 8 core
shouldn't it still actually use less power since its twice smaller process? Unless "7"nm means absolutely nothing and is just a marketing gimmick.

>Wait until the nerds optimize it for Zen2.
AMD Just Waitâ„¢ Technology

>shouldn't it still actually use less power since its twice smaller process?
no?
explain why you think this would be the case

>8 cores on 14nm
>12 cores on 7nm
>50% more cores on 2x smaller process

7nm TSMC is closer to Intel's 10nm.

but explain why you think it would use less power

>Drivers are committed to the kernel months/years in advance by the manufacturer. Individuals rarely touch them. Any optimisation to be done already has been.
That's why my 2200g worked perfectly on Linux from the start, right? No.
Every time new hardware comes out Linux has issues. I'm used to it.
It will be fixed.

AMD is for dumb teenagers who have no idea what they're doing.

Another Intcel cope thread.
Imagine my shock.

Attached: 1566530931814.png (992x1043, 534K)

intel is for dumb niggers who have no idea about technology

Why does AMD cpu lose peformance when paired to an Nvidia card?

nvidia doesnt have a hardware scheduler and does more in the driver (cpu)

>All these graphs showing AMD tradin blows with parts that cost $100-300 more

What is your point?

>doesn't show performance per watt

Attached: special_use.jpg (900x900, 42K)

They never were in the first place

Attached: price performance.png (2523x820, 605K)

now do the average of more than 5

Attached: 36-game-benchmark.png (1499x868, 410K)

Intel will always be a garbage trash company with pozzed stuttering housefire piece of shit products.

cpubenchmark.net/cpu_value_available.html

Attached: 1506977173618.jpg (882x758, 324K)

So Ryzen is still less value for money? Good to know