Is this shit even worth getting?
Now that AMD lied and falsely advertised the boost clocks
Other urls found in this thread:
pcgamesn.com
techradar.com
tomshardware.com
hothardware.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Ur gonna need a source of you're making that accusation
pcgamesn.com
techradar.com
tomshardware.com
hothardware.com
No. Real-world performance doesn't matter. No arbitrary number in HWiNFO, no sale!
>MOMMY MOMMY MOMMY MOMMY
Bootlicker
>Is this shit even worth getting?
Yeah. Even De8auer recommends it at the end of the video that caused the whole drama. Their marketing is lying garbage, but they kind of got pretty much no competition right now.
shut the fuck up and enjoy your 2 core cpu
The CPUs are still good. Buy one, maybe you'll get some money back later, just like the people who bought a GTX 970
Overclocking is a shit concept by default. Literally the last shit I'd give a fuck about.
>matching the 9900K in Cinebench etc for 66% of the price
Is it worth it? Sure.
Sincerely, 8700K owner.
My 2600X was never hitting the advertised 4.2 ghz either
my 2600 hits 3.8 all cores!
AMD is the only option at this point. If anything, that means they deserve a lot more scrutiny than before.
My 1600 maxes out at 2.85Ghz
The only way AMD can make sales is by lying through their teeths
Supporting such a lying company is bad for everyone
They're good cpus but it shouldn't be acceptable that they claim boost clocks less than 50% of their cpus can actually achieve.
HOW DO I RUN ASUS x570 HERO ON STOCK AND NOT SHITTY ASUS OPTIMIZED MEMES
I ONLY BOOST TO 3.7 on single thread cinebench
>buying an AMD product on launch
LMAOing @ u beta testers
How far can it be overclocked on stock voltage?
why do even want 3700x ? just get 3600
>benchmarks are untrue because of marketing
sure thing