STARTING with 24 cores

wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-3000-official-launch-november/

>STARTING with 24 cores
>"16 cores" is now OFFICIALLY mainstream-only from here on

Where were you when AMD in less than 3 years made it so we've gone from Shitel's "4-core/8-thread mainstream" slavery, to 16-core/32-thread mainstream freedom?

Now watch them pull off equivalently the same with noVideo in just a couple years from now.

Attached: e8de1fa7761b239e954776ddcbc04d8289afed59fb035513b0da052cec0812d4.png (991x917, 864K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LjdCNyCkeqg
gamersnexus.net/news-pc/3510-hw-news-threadripper-8-channel-4-channel-leaks
techpowerup.com/259080/amd-agesa-1-0-0-3abba-detailed-fixes-zen2-boost-issues
videocardz.com/newz/gigabyte-z490-x299x-and-trx40-motherboards-spotted-at-eec
techpowerup.com/258739/amd-readies-three-hedt-chipsets-trx40-trx80-and-wrx80
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>"AMD has also announced that the initial SKUs would include a 24 core and 48 thread chip as the top variant with more chips to follow later on"
Fucking speed reading retard.

"initial" means the LOWEST POSSIBLE DENOMINATOR, you dumb illiterate Intbecile toddler scrubshit faggot.

>>STARTING with 24 cores
>>"16 cores" is now OFFICIALLY mainstream-only from here on

Attached: 1506383390040.png (496x522, 193K)

>STARTING with 24 cores
fuck I was hoping for a high clock speed 16 core with quad channel memory

Don't worry intelbros.......10nm+++ will destroy AMD..............

Attached: 1491958654249.png (653x726, 84K)

I think 16 TR cores are still a thing

Wait until Zen 3/3+ for that.

This is pretty much the first time in history when AMD is on a better node. Or am I wrong?

>what is K6~K8
>what is Phenom beating the living shit out of Core2

>Now watch them pull off equivalently the same with noVideo in just a couple years from now.
That's a tall task, Intel has hardly done shit since Sandy Bridge, NVIDIA has been improving constantly and in the last few generations their lead has only kept widening. AMD hasn't made something decent in the high end since the R9 290X and even with that one they completely botched the launch with that inadequate hairdrier of a cooler on the reference model.

>*Phenom II
Self fix

based

It was roughly 5 years ago and intel were parading there new 21 core xeons as the most cores on a chip. Thank God for amd

>That's a tall task
5700XT already beats 2070 and matches 2080S. Meanwhile, 5800 and 5900 Radeons are coming out soon, while nGreedia will be sitting on a worse tech-process for at least 6 months longer.

What about single thread performance though? It's still very important.

>NVIDIA has been improving constantly

Attached: GIMPWORSE VS FINEWINE.png (736x736, 1.55M)

Attached: 1562549113755.png (1414x782, 64K)

Initial, "existing or occurring in the beginning". At FIRST its going to launch with a MAXIMUM of 24 cores as clearly stated by "top variant" and is easily understandable if you learnt how to read during childhood.

6
MILLION
CORE
KIKERIPPER

kekkles

don't try to turn the meme around schlomo

>their lead has only kept widening
youtube.com/watch?v=LjdCNyCkeqg

Attached: 6OLnf5VZYwqNTuus.jpg (335x314, 76K)

delid dis

>what is Phenom II beating the living shit out of Core2
Nehalem was Phenom II's main competition, not Core 2.

How much is Threadripper 3 going to cost?

Nehalem didn't have competition. And so didn't Sandy.
Phenom II was made to destroy (and destroy it did) Core2.

You tell us:

Attached: 1543201660279.png (631x310, 14K)

>START
there's a 4 die minimum .. there not going to put some shitty die with a 50% core yield on it. My thoughts are that 24-32 cores will be quad channel.. 32+ cores will be on the 8 channel boards. I'm in for a 32 core to slot into my existing TR4 board. Better be a sensible price. Everything else can fuck off for now. Thanks for the core count doubling + properly fed ayymd

I'm gonna guess $1000-1200 for a 24 core threadripper

Valley scam/vaporware/bankruptcy incoming

It was already pretty much confirmed by Lisa that THIRDRIPPER (official name inside AMD, BTW) won't have anything above 32 cores. It'll be 32 cores tops, as to not cannibalize on EBYN 2, but it's going to be much higher clocked, perfectly binned 32 cores. Basically the creamiest of the crops.

Oof
Guess I'll stick with the 9700

Attached: 1533977391463.png (1196x676, 1.05M)

AMD wasn't on a better node then, they just had a better arch

TIME FOR MORE LIES AND BRIBES

gamersnexus.net/news-pc/3510-hw-news-threadripper-8-channel-4-channel-leaks
> sWRX8 Workstation
Compute TBD cores/threads TBD cores/threads
512KB L2 Cache per core 512KB L2 Cache per core
TBD L3 Cache TBD L3 Cache
Memory 4-channel DDR4, ECC 3200MT/s 8-channel DDR4, ECC 3200MT/s
UDIMM UDIMM, RDIMM, LRDIMM
2 DIMMs/channel 1 DIMM/channel
256GB/channel capacity 256GB/channel capacity
OC support No OC support
Integrated IO 64 lanes of PCI Express Gen4
16 switchable lanes with SATA 96-128 lanes PCIe 4
32 switchable to SATA
UART, USB, eSPI, SPI, LPC, I2C UART, USB, eSPI, SPI, LPC, I2C

Which is why the 32+ core count will get a different name smooth brain.
WEW.
Thread-ripper runs the same socket as Rome. They can do whatever they please with the core count.
> But mommy su said...
Shit changes all the time brainlet

Attached: Behind.jpg (491x491, 42K)

checked

>Goym's Next Ass
>ever again after the pic-elated

Attached: GN moron.png (729x243, 1.35M)

If you think gaymansnexus is bad wait until you see the LITERAL cuck der8auer, he's twice as bad and cucked.

Damn, even with the small chiplets they can't meet demand. I wonder how it'll fare next year when they move to 7nm EUV.

This is why Intel is stuck on 14nm, 10nm yields are fucking shit and ringbus is dead.

>even moar cores at 4.0ghz
I really dont give a fuck with trash clock speeds

I don't "think" that retard Steve is bad. I KNOW it for a FACT, after that fiasco of his:

Attached: GayMenNerdAss.png (1173x54, 498K)

yea I mean they won't be cheap for sure. compared to desktop grade processors that is. if you really want a 16 core the 3950x is the way to go, which is $750. but I mean just for perspective, intel would charge like $6000 for a 24 core part or more. the idea of it being "only" $1k is mindblowing.

>4GHz
How is it there, several months back?
techpowerup.com/259080/amd-agesa-1-0-0-3abba-detailed-fixes-zen2-boost-issues

At least he's not a literal cuck

>>even moar cores at 4.0ghz
>I really dont give a fuck with trash clock speeds

Attached: 1544667387109.png (813x1402, 324K)

He's a bribed shill and an arrogant liar. He's the very definition of a cuck.

How is it running clock speeds from a decade ago?

>Intel fixes more security holes and slow your CPU down with BIOS updates
>Meanwhile AMD speeds your CPU up with BIOS updates

> videocardz.com/newz/gigabyte-z490-x299x-and-trx40-motherboards-spotted-at-eec
Finally, the TRX40 motherboards are designed for upcoming AMD Threadripper 3000 series. This is a new naming schema for AMD HEDT platform. The TRX40 (and supposedly TRX80) will succeed existing X399 series.
> techpowerup.com/258739/amd-readies-three-hedt-chipsets-trx40-trx80-and-wrx80
shithead

Attached: dumbfuck.jpg (2188x978, 304K)

Yes he's a shill and an arrogant liar, but not A FUCKING LITERAL C U C K O L D

How is it to still be a 4-core/8-thread Intbecile of an anal rooster bitch?

holy BASED

based & amdpilled

Wait...are you IMPLYING there's something I don't know in regards to Der8auer's sexual/private life?

His girlfriend is a pornstar.

Are you a retard? The pic has nothing to do with your pottery. It's about a different video.

Ive had a 6 core intel for 2 years in nov buddy boy. Didnt get memed into 1600 trash

...HUH? THAT is news to me. Proofs/links?

Google "der8auer girlfriend", it's MarryFox

>I've had a 6-core Inturd for 2 years
While I've been on a 16-core system at that time. Cry harder, Intbecile.

Attached: 1557320721274.png (1037x311, 340K)

>2019
>running an intel processor
>bragging about it

Attached: boost.jpg (477x315, 26K)

OY VEY GOYIM DELETE

>think he's trolling
>jewgle (DDG) it
>it's all true
I'm never watching der8auer ever again.
Semi-decent (that nose, tho...eww) fap-material, though.

It's the same information confirmed by two other sites you shit brain retard. That's the point idiot.

Attached: FINEWINE.png (800x420, 985K)

It's literally not the same video that was discussed in or pics, you cretin.

why could I tell der8auer was a cuck just by looking at him

Running 2x Xeon X5690 for nearly 7 years, cannot find a reason to bother upgrading.

>higher is better
Yes goy

hmm

>Running 2x Xeon X5690
>cannot find a reason to upgrade

Attached: 1562509406387.png (671x837, 36K)

Retard confirmed. Idgaf about some faggot shit in the past. I was speaking about TR which is on-topic with op. the info was accurate. I could give a fuck less who delivered it. I dont suck off e-celebs or follow their drama. I googled the terminology for the 8-channel TR board and linked to the first hit.

>going online everyday to shill amd products
>getting upset when someone doesn't like amd products

Attached: FCF88AEDC0D341A88B019CC763E9B95F.jpg (860x960, 63K)

>posts unrelated marketing material
Kek these amd salesmen really laying it on thick

What's the highest 3900X can hit with single core without memes like LN2?

What will be the highest single core burst speed for threadrippers?

fuck man, that image scared the hell out of me

You're a real piece of work, eh, Intbecile. Absolutely unable into comprehension, eh? Fine then, here you go:

Attached: bc409bf7b5d6e839bf086f3189132b5d58c31d33e5ad17a795b9f3a1ad421b29.png (632x236, 28K)

4.7 or something like that on stock air, with ABBA update.

I am not reading any more of your marketing material, raakesh. I never asked for it.

>implying poos

Attached: 1544027506871.png (4366x2638, 3.42M)

Attached: 1566960439949.png (1024x526, 502K)

That's seriously impressive

>*can't make it faster*
>"add more cores!"
I miss the optimism of the early 1990s.

Attached: 590.png (640x480, 345K)

>rooster_with_horse.jpg

He is her pimp, you mong.

that's only a single core that gets boosted that high though, all core is a fair bit lower

Uh huh

AMD has always been the MOAR CORES company though. How young are you shills? Also threadrippers are for enthusiasts which will be bought be basically a tiny % of the PC market. It's irrelevant.

What sort of speeds would be expected on all cores of the 12 core 3900?

GAMING DOESN'T ALWAYS MATTER

You're free to like shitel pozzed trash products, just like scatfags are free to like literal shit.

Attached: 1562545301216.png (822x812, 71K)

depends on the motherboard and vrm. here's a chart from before the patch that increased clock speeds by a lot, without overclocking.

Attached: ss.png (1307x734, 793K)

SIR ples delete this image thank

wow coming from a 4 core 4.0 Intel chip this looks fucking beautiful... what is it that people are complaining about, that it wont reach 4.7? i get being annoyed by that but god damn that is a lot of power still.

that's a 3800x but yeah to be honest a lot of the complaining has been nonsense, the latest patch did increase clock speeds though

the insane part of the zen 2 chips is how low the tdp is, I mean the new 9900kys already has an extremely high tdp not counting the fact that it's a 8 core and also intel uses a ridiculous low version of tdp