Fuck modern webdesign

post websites that are comfy and easy to navigate.

Attached: 201909211412.png (1355x648, 89K)

Other urls found in this thread:

9front.org/propaganda/
contemporary-home-computing.org/prof-dr-style/
danluu.com/term-latency/
mcmaster.com/
arngren.net/
n-gate.com/about/
durgasoft.com/
idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
lobste.rs
archive.org/details/Jow
lingscars.com/
modarchive.org/
elv.sh/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Attached: 1569053771716.jpg (636x831, 171K)

blog.fefe.de

Attached: iu.png (949x643, 104K)

cat-v.org

9front.org/propaganda/

wiby.me

>fuck good UI

Attached: 201909211410.png (1220x644, 215K)

Attached: wtf.jpg (640x640, 187K)

Prof. Dr. Style is literally the only good web design See contemporary-home-computing.org/prof-dr-style/

Attached: hero.png (1024x718, 233K)

i can't believe how bad companies like google and twitter are at design.
flow? none.
explains itself to the user? not usually.
functional? no (see youtube bell and twitter mutes)
that's without discussing cancers like material design. they're the villains of ux, but spread their bad practices across the web.

(9)

Attached: 1568682134653.jpg (1024x768, 138K)

Also Dan Luu's site, see this article for example: danluu.com/term-latency/

all academic sites should be like this.

Attached: 201909211457.png (539x644, 131K)

This is what peak website design looks like. It may upset you, but this is it.

mcmaster.com/

Attached: 2-6-500x500[1].jpg (500x500, 24K)

cont.

Attached: 201909211458.png (1353x648, 156K)

9/10
Plan9 is a comfy and aesthetic os with web browsers that only support comfy and aesthetic websites.

Attached: 1320965158.png (1280x1024, 599K)

i came a little.

So responsive and pleasant.

>mcmaster.com/
Looks nice *and* is useful. Bookmarking since I'll probably order something

You guys have no idea what you are inn for
>arngren.net/

Attached: arngren.jpg (2834x1414, 1.39M)

itt: what the web would look like if normalfags wouldn't be using it

n-gate.com/about/

durgasoft.com/

RMS's website is a mess to look at, especially that top portion. use some fucking colors.

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-09-21 21-10-20.png (1748x999, 77K)

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-09-21 21-11-54.png (1125x948, 263K)

that orange website

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-09-21 21-12-48.png (1567x955, 233K)

idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm

>points

isthisthingon.org

comfy

Attached: textfiles.com.png (870x650, 60K)

orange website bad

lobste.rs is better, the comments suck on both tho

Attached: Screen Shot.png (1974x1751, 476K)

im still waiting for him to upload those 2009 Jow Forums archives.

but visuals are ok, and it serves very few data so loads really well on mobile data or droppy network
and from time to time I skim-read 100 headlines and find few articles daily that are interesting. same with comments - it's bloated with uninteresting noise, but there are always those few comments that are helpful.

>better
depending on criteria, this thread is about visuals and web 1.0. hn wins here

why?

You mean this archive from 2009? archive.org/details/Jow Forums_threads_archive_10_billion
Unless you mean an archive of 2009 posts

>how to build bombs
kek I remember those

Unironically B+R

Kind of weird to think that those files were all over the place and no one seemed to really pay it any mind.

Internet was young and retards weren't just there yet. Internet reached critical mass around mid 2000s and that's where social media took off and killed any sense/semblance of rationality.

it was a different time back then.

Attached: rms.jpg (567x565, 66K)

Attached: excuse me.jpg (228x233, 8K)

Jow Forums.org

weebs are fucking creepy weirdos

Only the best.

Attached: Untitled.png (1012x955, 361K)

>easy to navigate
There's literally no organization

you seem to hate stylesheets more than design

>It's fucking real

Attached: Wait what.gif (200x235, 1.29M)

Here's another favorite. They sell good stuff, too.

Attached: Untitled.png (928x980, 625K)

'good' UI is typically the same site over and over and over though

UX >> UI

lingscars.com/

Attached: Screen-shot-2014-02-02-at-21.07.26.png (677x500, 293K)

Too busy and distracting, making it hard to find the content

Now here's a classic site. Colorful, but easy on the eyes. Simple to navigate.

Attached: Screen Shot.png (2082x1469, 358K)

One of the first websites I ever visited

Attached: tdc.png (961x1219, 229K)

modarchive.org/
Honestly can't fault it.

>easy to navigate
There's literally no organization

If you find it hard to find content in , you might have brain damage.

meh, it's just boring, doesn't do things particularly well or poorly

elv.sh/

Attached: pouet.png (954x1054, 401K)

slackware.com

If you weren't retarded you would see the big box.

and that's only for like 25% of the content