>tfw you get banned from /a/ for the second time for making fun of ACK
Tfw you get banned from /a/ for the second time for making fun of ACK
Eli Martinez
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
pastebin.com
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
desuarchive.org
desuarchive.org
desuarchive.org
desuarchive.org
twitter.com
Logan Rivera
no one cares
Matthew Martinez
Follow the rules, human!
Elijah Jones
ACK is STILL THERE doing that shit?
fucking christ
Bentley Bell
Before reading note the difference between a few key terms:
Stance, and opinion are not the same thing. Opinions are based on non-factual information while a stance is not. Also, interpretation and deduction are not the same. Interpretation is simply the explaining of data, but all not explains are not based on fact. Deduction is the breakdown of events through the use of law or principle.
Key Point – Just because you call something incorrect doesn’t mean it is. Words alone are not proof. Which is why counter points must be made using deduction and supporting inferences.
When you pair a character with anyone other than their respective canon counterpart you are making direct negative implications about them and the feelings they express in the series they are from and degrade them as a whole. By pairing them with other characters you are stating that the feelings they express in the series are weak or otherwise worthless. This is due to multiple factors, every action works on the same principle of cause and effect, meaning that any statement a third party makes about the characters has implications about them, whether the third party intended for them to be there or not. Remembering two things; implication means the result of logical consequence, and that there are three base states of action – positive, negative, and neutral. All action falls under one of those three categories. To degrade something means to make a negative action towards it. Note that you can make degrading implications about anything, not just living people, which is why it’s factual to say you degrade the characters by making negative implications about them. Also bearing in mind that all fan made work makes direct implications about the characters for another reason. It’s “fan” work, the characters being used are predefined and developed, if you were not making a statement on the characters you would not be making fan work, but original content.
Anthony Foster
ACK is boring. It's always the same responses. Barneyfag can at least talk like a normal human being sometimes
Jacob Bell
Characters are concepts that exist as set-in-stone entities. Meaning once their story is told we, as third parties viewing the events, posses all available information about them. Granted their story does not continue in a canon sequel. But even then, as new information is given we as a third party have full access to it. Point being that once a story is told it factually exists as that story and no personal view or interpretation can change the events that actually happened. Just because fallible interpretations can be made does not mean all interpretations are valid. Which is why personal taste and opinion is not a factor when determining whether certain content is insulting or degrading to the characters involved. Also, fictional stories are limited concepts set within the parameters of its creators. People are not capable of limitless thought, so neither are the concepts which they make, which is why all questions about fiction have a finite answer set. The answer set may not be one item, but the set is finite.
A character is given worth through its story’s development. This is true because if a character is not developed they are considered a blank slate, and a blank slate has no worth. If a character is not developed then no story about it has been told, meaning it’s not even a character. Characters are abstract concepts and as such their value is also abstract, meaning it is not a numerical value but a conceptual one.
Aiden Long
Anonymous (ID: t9KsMvrC) 02/13/19(Wed)10:41:17 No.7491780
>tfw you get banned from /a/ for the second time for making fun of ACK
Anonymous (ID: DV99lx/S) 02/13/19(Wed)10:41:43 No.7491782
no one cares
Asriel (ID: wcVWYHn2) 02/13/19(Wed)10:42:18 No.7491785
(OP)
Follow the rules, human!
Anonymous (ID: K2VV8TLh) 02/13/19(Wed)10:42:50 No.7491788
178437bcb09aa6a4f956c805c(...).jpg (114 KB, 1200x1000) google yandex iqdb wait
114 KB
ACK is STILL THERE doing that shit?
fucking christ
anonscans.wordpress.com (ID: K2VV8TLh) 02/13/19(Wed)10:43:55 No.7491794
Before reading note the difference between a few key terms:
Stance, and opinion are not the same thing. Opinions are based on non-factual information while a stance is not. Also, interpretation and deduction are not the same. Interpretation is simply the explaining of data, but all not explains are not based on fact. Deduction is the breakdown of events through the use of law or principle.
Key Point – Just because you call something incorrect doesn’t mean it is. Words alone are not proof. Which is why counter points must be made using deduction and supporting inferences.
When you pair a character with anyone other than their respective canon counterpart you are making direct negative implications about them and the feelings they express in the series they are from and degrade them as a whole. By pairing them with other characters you are stating that the feelings they express in the series are weak or otherwise worthless. This is due to multiple factors, every action works on the same principle of cause and effect, meaning that any statement a third party makes about the characters has implications about them, whether the third party intended for them to be there or not. Remembering two things; implication means the result of logical consequence, and that there are three base states of action – positive, negative, and neutral. All action falls under one of those thre
Jaxson Perez
Developed in a canon setting gives a character worth, so when that development is discarded for the sake of pairing the character with someone other than their canon counterpart you are implying that said development is worthless in the setting where choose to pair the alternate characters. It makes this implication because in the setting with the alternate pair the canon feelings of said characters are not being used. To not use the feelings is the same as saying the feelings have no worth because if the state of being used does not give them worth, nothing does. Just saying “I give the feelings worth because I like them” is not the same as actually giving them worth because you just stating something does not make it true. Similar to saying “I am running” while you are actually walking. Statements alone do not prove fact, the result of logical consequence proves fact as the results can be repeated and tested by multiple parties. Remembering that value comes canon development and implying that canon development is the same fan development is making a high to low comparison, thus is a negative state of action, and is thus degrading to the story and characters. Also, to be degrading does not have to have an actual effect on the content. “Degrading” is the only the type of statement you are making. It should also be noted that the term canon is used to describe what is factual within a fictional setting. And the one way to prove something is canon is to be able to support it through events in the series. Which is why the not all official content is canon, and some series have multiple canons.
Ian Morris
I dunno, I still think his insanity is funny after like 5 years
Jeremiah Campbell
The main reason that alternative pairings are degrading to the characters is that it implies their feelings are weak and disposable. If the feelings between two characters are strong then they would not easily fall in love with other characters, which is what alternative pairs imply as they make direct implications about the characters due to the nature of being fan made content. And the same as it was before making a high to low comparison about the strength of the character’s feelings is a negative action, and thus a degrading type of statement. Not all deviation from canon is a negative implication, mind you. Only concept that in some way implies negative things about the topic. In addition, not all interaction between characters is “shipping” interaction. Only specific events have romantic connotations, even in subtext based shows. But, even under the false assumption that all interaction is “shipping” interaction pairing the characters with their non-canon counterparts is still degrading to them as you are comparing the high amount of interaction they have with their canon pair to the low amount they have with the alternative pair, again, being high to low, which makes it degrading.
It also does not matter if you “seriously” like the alternative pair or not, because no matter what you personally feel about the pair you are still making the negative implications about the feelings of the canon pair. Sort of like saying “I was just kidding about you being worthless and disposable, haha, it was just a joke.” The intention/verbal confirmation and logical consequence of the actions do not match.
Nathan Richardson
e categories. To degrade something means to make a negative action towards it. Note that you can make degrading implications about anything, not just living people, which is why it’s factual to say you degrade the characters by making negative implications about them. Also bearing in mind that all fan made work makes direct implications about the characters for another reason. It’s “fan” work, the characters being used are predefined and developed, if you were not making a statement on the characters you would not be making fan work, but original content.
Anonymous (ID: E8Uo22+8) 02/13/19(Wed)10:44:38 No.7491796
ACK is boring. It's always the same responses. Barneyfag can at least talk like a normal human being sometimes
anonscans.wordpress.com (ID: K2VV8TLh) 02/13/19(Wed)10:45:00 No.7491798
Characters are concepts that exist as set-in-stone entities. Meaning once their story is told we, as third parties viewing the events, posses all available information about them. Granted their story does not continue in a canon sequel. But even then, as new information is given we as a third party have full access to it. Point being that once a story is told it factually exists as that story and no personal view or interpretation can change the events that actually happened. Just because fallible interpretations can be made does not mean all interpretations are valid. Which is why personal taste and opinion is not a factor when determining whether certain content is insulting or degrading to the characters involved. Also, fictional stories are limited concepts set within the parameters of its creators. People are not capable of limitless thought, so neither are the concepts which they make, which is why all questions about fiction have a finite answer set. The answer set may not be one item, but the set is finite.
A character is given worth through its story’s development. This is true because if a character is not developed they are considered a blank sl
Logan Myers
To pair the characters with multiple people you are also treating them as interchangeable and disposable, which is highly insulting because it make many negative statements about them; that their feelings feelings are weak, that their character as a “person” has no real substance, that they’re not capable of being faithful to anything, etc etc. If you claim that any situation you put the characters in will lead to romantic development then that’s the same as saying all romance involving them is cheap. Basic math will tell you this. It’s a simple 1 to 1 ratio, as delta when exchanged is zero that mean everything is worth because no gain is possible. To simplify it further, you are claiming that there is nothing special about the canon relationship because it could easily be replaced. And of course, implying a strong relationship is nothing special is a high to low comparison, thus it is degrading statement.
In closing; please be aware of the difference between an opinion and a stance. An opinion is based on non-factual information. And all of the things stated here are based on the logical cohesion of events and their results and can be repeated by other parties using the same process, thus they are facts. Also, as stated before, just saying words alone is not proof of deduction, so simply calling something “wrong” is meaningless unless you support why it’s wrong. And if something is an opinion rather than a fact, you can prove it’s an opinion by pointing out the flaw in the logical process where a factor depends solely on a personal value rather than a value determined through the development of events
Connor Harris
guy is on /qa/ now lole
Michael Butler
shippai datte Good night...
kyou mo mata mata yarakashite
iiwake shiteru tame iki nado tsukeba
sugoshi nemuku nari mabuta ochitara
ofuton ga shiawase kureru no
fukafukka de itsumo arigatou
tsutsumarete ureshii na
yume e to yukkuri yukkuri susumimasho
juuryoku ga nakunaru
waai gokigen da susugapii
shippai datte Good night
nenige suru koto mo waruku nai yo ne
kitto me ga samete wasurechau minna
shippai datte Don't mind
asa no mabushisa ni kiete shimaeba ii na
atarashii ichinichi de risetto!
okite poya poya tesaguri de
tokkei wo sagasu bikkuri shita nande
dare ka okoshite yo maniawanai yo
ofuton ga shiawase sugita ne
awateppuri sassoku kigaetara
shimaranai sukaato no
fasunaa asereba asereru hodo
saiaku ne nuno ga hasamatta
eendou natteru no puppukapuu
sanzan datta Morning
yoyuu motanakucha kokete bakari de
motto shikari ne sugoshi dakke hekomu
sanzan datta Don't mind
kutsu wo hakinagara soto e tobidasu
kirari ii tenki suteki da ne ganbacchau
taiman nante iwanaide
souchou nante tsuranaide
seishun nante shiranaide
ase ase jiri jiri nan nensei?
shoukai nante kikanaide
souzou nante tomenaide
Everyday,everyone! Yeah! Yeah!! Yeah!!!
shippai datte Good night
nenige suru koto mo waruku nai yo ne
kitto me ga samete wasurechau minna
shippai datte Don't mind
asa no mabushisa ni kiete shimaeba ii na
atarashii ichinichi de risetto!
fuka fuka de chakkari arigatou
sukapii sukapii suka okinakucha
fuka fuuka desu ka piisu ka
poya poya de mattari ikitai na
meso meso de awatete mou dasshu
poya pooya de meso meeso de
Eli Nguyen
Dare dare dare ga dare dare dare ni
Dare dare dare no koto ki ni shiteru no
Shukudai nara shibushibu oshieru
Ayashii guzzu kau no mo tsukiau
Akire nagara hori kocchi da yo hora
Genki dashi nasai yo
Chigau deshou harahara shinagara
Hogoshateki ni watashi wa tsukareru
Akireteru yo demo kocchiki no demo
Tama ni gakkari
Nande nande nande
Kurasu wa betsu na no nande Kamisama?
Nande nande nande
Doo demo ii yo to
Kuuru na tsumori de ochikondeta
Hyaku paa manzoku nante
Nai desho nai kedo kitari shichatteta yo
Maitoshi surechigau no wa
Guuzen dakara ne
Wadai wa tsukinai no ni
Tokidoki samishiku naru baka mitai ne
Dase dase dashite dase dase daseba
Dase dase omou koto itte ii yo
Anime raibu uruuru kandou
Gensaku da yo ranobe mo yomi na yo
Shikkari shite mou ganbari na mou
Kiai ire naoshite
Watashi dake batabata isogashii
Yakuwaribuntan ga okashii…
Shikkari shi na maji ganbare yo maji
Chotto kiite yo
Ima ga ima ga ima ga
Shiawase na no ka na ima ga tsudzukeba
Ima wa ima wa ima wa
Doo ni ka naru yo ne
Gooru wa mienai soko ga ii na
Ten paa kanashii toki mo
Aru kara aru hodo warattereba iiya
Maishuu kurikaeshiteru
Touzen konya mo
Denwa ga nagain da yo ne
Keetai wa juuden shite itsu demo okkee
Hyaku paa manzoku nante
Nai desho nai kedo kitari shichatteta yo
Maikai asa hiru issho
Guuzen dakara ne
Wadai wa tsukinai no ni
Ryder King
Literally everyone single one of these posts is by the same person. Seriously, !Akemi, you need medical help.
Christopher Cook
You ain't got NO PROOF that I'm Akemi
Mason Ramirez
Jaxson Gray
The proof is that you type "Akemi" and not an actual tripcode, which is "!Akemi". You are literally the only person who does this.
Landon Stewart
Please, answer me, how did you get this brain damaged?
Nicholas Scott
Leo Brown
...
Jaxon Ward
Owen Myers
Why does this nigger obsess over this random tripfag lol
Isaiah Brown
No one is obsessed with you, !Akemi.
You are just the only one who ever posts this garbage and acts this way. So your name constantly gets used.
Leo Brown
Camden Hill
Oh shit now he’s changed IPs
Sebastian Price
>literally never addressing anything said to him
This is why it's so obvious who you are.
Elijah Reyes
Xavier Ward
...
Mason Allen
Jacob Cruz
...
Josiah Turner
Liam Hernandez
...
Leo Phillips
Sebastian Price
!Akemi
I don't get what that's supposed to prove. Also what is !Akemi?
Jordan Carter
...
Julian Williams
Gavin Evans
...
Asher Williams
Easton Mitchell
...
Luke Butler
Cameron Sanders
...
Josiah Kelly
Spamming random memes isn't going to work against him either
you just have to be where he isn't. you don't fight, you run.
I cannot fathom what being around this person in real life must be like. For sure I'd have tried to kill him.
Kevin Baker
Hunter Edwards
Notice how yet again you still haven't named a single thing that makes "ack" the problem. You are literally just trying to slander and harass people because you have nothing else in your life.
Carson Cox
Henry Cook
...
Luis Nelson
Bentley Wilson
...
Logan Allen
Dylan Morales
...
Jeremiah Gonzalez
John Harris
...
Caleb Murphy
I've had someone type exactly this to me about 2 years ago on /u/ because I asked what the hell this ACK guy was and why everyone hated him
someone said I must be him so I protested for a bit but they seemed delusional so eventually I just shitposted and got banned
Xavier Rivera
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.
Christopher Martin
You said "everyone hated him", !Akemi. Which gives away who you are. Because everyone actually knows you're samefagging and the only person who thinks "ack" is real. You really, really aren't as smart as you think you are.
Cameron Parker
at least you're here and not on /u/ anymore goddamn
Colton Myers
>you
There is no "you", !Akemi.
Ayden Martinez
I suppose there's no way to completely disprove that I am the same as everyone else in the thread, as it would be easy enough to just proxyfag
however, you don't understand the burden of proof at all so I'm just gonna hide the thread alright
Jordan Miller
There is no such thing as "burden of proof", !Akemi. That's nothing but a legal tool used in court to prevent double jeopardy.
In reality, with actual discussion, if something is true it's true, if it's false it's false. You build your statements around what you are trying to say. No matter what says what, you still need to be able to prove your stance is correct, not just scream "durrr u have to me prove me wrong or I'm right!" over and over.
2+2 will always be 4, no matter what you can prove this in a discussion.
Nathaniel Clark
youtube.com
Party time song.
Grayson Peterson
I honestly have no idea. I mean I know the guy was a cancerous attention whore but I can't pinpoint what he did to set the guy off.
Ryan Torres
Why are you replying to yourself, !Akemi?
And no one is obsessed with you. Literally fucking no one wants anything to do with you. You just keep forcing yourself on people.
Kevin Thomas
Why are you replying to yourself, !Akemi?
And no one is obsessed with you. Literally fucking no one wants anything to do with you. You just keep forcing yourself on people.
Jacob James
Huh. Still here.
Joseph Smith
Sean please.
Nicholas Nguyen
Look at how pathetically desperate you are to keep your shit thread alive.
How do you have such a genuinely pathetic life?
Gabriel Parker
Cooper Morgan
Reminder to peruse before it gets 404'd.
Wyatt Collins
Get the crazy man's post cleared up and it'll go below bump limit.
Ryan Murphy
You are the only crazy one here, !Akemi.
And no one cares about your garbage threads. You are literally trying to fake interest in your own "memes" because you want to feel like you're accepted somewhere.
Aiden Powell
How can one man fight on more fronts at once than Hitler
Carson Rivera
He is the Hero Jow Forums needs but not the one we deserve.
Brody Hughes
Frankly we don't need or deserve him, and his behavior (pastebin.com
Josiah Clark
I was making a Batman joke but yeah this guy needs to be in a nuthouse. Why has this been allowed to go on for so long? He literally thinks there were numerous persons telling off his enemy in the /qa/ thread when it was just him.
Tyler Scott
I get your joke, normally I'd agree and say we deserve it, but this goes above and beyond shit like barneyfag or the guy who stalked a tripfag for years.
It's autism on another level and he's been doing it for 5+ years and running 12+ hours a day.
Kayden Bennett
He's still melting down in /qa/, too.
Camden King
No, shitting on your for being retarded and you never addressing anything anyone says to you is not having a melt down.
You on the other hand are having a melt down. As you can do nothing but personally attack people.
Lincoln Butler
Stop ban evading.
Connor Thompson
When you stop ban evading for the sole purpose of attacking people.
Jonathan Turner
/qa/ Thread back under limit. Told you you should have cleared it.
Oliver Smith
Every single one of these posts is made by !Akemi. As are all posts that say "ack". He has an insane freak obsession with "ack" to the point it consumes his entire life. You can easily spot !Akemi in a few ways. Not the least of which is how he tries to claim that "ack" is "schizo" because he calls out !Akemi on samefagging. He tries to claim that "everyone" is called !Akemi. Yet oddly, it's !Akemi himself isn't schizo for trying to claim everyone is "ack". This blatant double standard is something that no sane person would actually do. And actual not sane people are pretty uncommon, so one being obsessed with "ack" and having a blatant double standard is a given to be the same person.
!Akemi never made anyone mad or pissed them off. This is just what !Akemi tells himself because "trolling" on Jow Forums is literally all he has in his life. That's why he's become CONSUMED with "ack" because he uses it as a tool to try and cope with how shit his life is. If he admits he's not making anyone mad, that will mean admitting he failed to "troll" on Jow Forums, thus fails at everything, and likely end up killing himself.
!Akemi tries to pretend that "ack" is attacking people (just him) by telling him to stop spamming and breaking the rules like this
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
And of course, the other day the mods outed that !Akemi talks to and replies to himself when he tries to force his agenda.
desuarchive.org
desuarchive.org
Here are posts where he was replying to himself. And when the mod deleted them they got cleared at the same second. Meaning they were on the same IP
Someone explained in full who !Akemi is here, for those who don't know.
desuarchive.org
Brody Edwards
/a/ died years ago. The mods decided that the best way to improve the board was to take out all the fun
Elijah Sanders
How long has he been at this now? I'm about to head to bed.
Dylan Jackson
Every single one of these posts is made by !Akemi. As are all posts that say "ack". He has an insane freak obsession with "ack" to the point it consumes his entire life. You can easily spot !Akemi in a few ways. Not the least of which is how he tries to claim that "ack" is "schizo" because he calls out !Akemi on samefagging. He tries to claim that "everyone" is called !Akemi. Yet oddly, it's !Akemi himself isn't schizo for trying to claim everyone is "ack". This blatant double standard is something that no sane person would actually do. And actual not sane people are pretty uncommon, so one being obsessed with "ack" and having a blatant double standard is a given to be the same person.
!Akemi never made anyone mad or pissed them off. This is just what !Akemi tells himself because "trolling" on Jow Forums is literally all he has in his life. That's why he's become CONSUMED with "ack" because he uses it as a tool to try and cope with how shit his life is. If he admits he's not making anyone mad, that will mean admitting he failed to "troll" on Jow Forums, thus fails at everything, and likely end up killing himself.
!Akemi tries to pretend that "ack" is attacking people (just him) by telling him to stop spamming and breaking the rules like this
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
And of course, the other day the mods outed that !Akemi talks to and replies to himself when he tries to force his agenda.
desuarchive.org
desuarchive.org
Here are posts where he was replying to himself. And when the mod deleted them they got cleared at the same second. Meaning they were on the same IP
Someone explained in full who !Akemi is here, for those who don't know.
desuarchive.org
Leo Ward
>!Akemi makes a thread announcing he's ban evading
>thread is off topic meta
>thread is breaking US laws of harassment
>mod comes to the thread and does nothing but defend !Akemi
Justin Foster
>thread is breaking US laws of harassment
Bentley Kelly
>thread is breaking US laws of harassment
Guess I'll be Tracer
I'm already Tracer
What about Widow Maker?
I'm already Widow Maker
I'll be Bastion
Nerf Bastion!
You're right, so Winston?
I wanna be Winston
I guess I'll be Genji
I'm already Genji
Then I'll be McCree
I already chose McCree
Tyler Gomez
This guy throws around the law book like an idiot.
Blake Bennett
Three more posts made by !Akemi.
He honestly thinks proxy posting will make him look like more than one person.
Luke Taylor
Sean is now in the HomuSaya thread on /qa/. Round 2?
Dylan Reed
When are you going to accept that you're not making anyone mad? Seriously, please, explain to me why you care so much about making people mad. Why won't you accept you fail at it?
Christian Jones
Vi undrarar ni redo alt vara med
Armarna upp nu ska ni fa se
Kom igen
Hvem som helst kan vara med
So ror pa era fotter
Oa-a-a
Och vicka era hofter
O-la-la-la...
Gor som vi
Till denna melodi
Oa-oa-a
Dansa med oss
Klappa era hander
Gor som vi gor
Ta nagra steg at vanster
Lyssna och lar
Missa inte chansen
Nu ar vi har med
Caramelldansen
O-o-oa-oa
O-o-oa-oa-a...
O-o-oa-oa
O-o-oa-oa-a...
Det blir en sensation over alt forstas
Pa fester kommer alla att slappa loss
Kom igen
Nu tar vi stegen omigen
Oa-oa...
Sa ror pa era fotter
Oa-a-a
Och vicka era hofter
O-la-la-la
Gor som vi
Til denna melodi
Sa kom och
Dansa med oss
Klappa era hander
Gor so vi gor
Ta nagra steg at vanster
Lyssna och lar
Missa inte chansen
Nu ar vi har med
Caramelldansen
Dansa med oss
Klappa era hander
Gor so vi gor
Ta negra steg at vanster
Lyssna och lar
Missa inte chansen
Nu ar vi har med
Caramelldansen
Liam Kelly
Hello fellow Aussie.
Anthony Bell
No, not "fellow", that's your own post.
William Stewart
Gabriel Nguyen
>you now can understand this
studying swedish was a mistake
David Jones
What? Who?