Tfw you see "woke" American college kids think Stalin and Marx were cool guys who fought for freedom and against...

tfw you see "woke" American college kids think Stalin and Marx were cool guys who fought for freedom and against oppression
tfw they think their degeneracy and their freedums would fly in USSR
tfw in Russia Stalin is mostly supported by ultra-conservative people over 60 who like to claim free market is a financial scheme and the United States is poisoning them with E additives
ISHYGDDT

Attached: jerry lofi.jpg (921x960, 141K)

Let them be. They give Putin more power than they realise they do.

I dislike dumb people

Attached: 9b1d13fe4030b5f8901a2949452b2945.jpg (400x576, 63K)

How so? These are libs, and it's not like libs support Russia at all. The only good they do is destabilize America, and make US a butt of jokes.

>The only good they do is destabilize America, and make US a butt of jokes.
Exactly.

are you one of those US lefties?

No I'm not

well then again their "destabilization" is simply shifting the power to different group
they only take power away from republicans, who are against Russia, and give it to democrats, who are against Russia and also against nationalism
so I don't think we win much unless some crazy socialist like Bernie or AoC ruins US economy

good

America is at a high risk of a civil war breaking out because of how politically divided they are. Either way, America will always be against Russia, because Russia rivals their power over the world. If that civil war breaks out, America will spiral down from being a global superpower and will enter a state of chaos.

Why you ask?

not sure civil war will happen because libs probably don't want it. they will likely stick to undermining white nationalism and resistance and gradually replacing white population until it's irreversible. this has been the plan all along. so I don't think snowflakes can lead to a civil war

I wasn't sure what your picture was supposed to mean

PHECK

Here a better one.
I dislike dumb people

Attached: adventure_capitalist_details_graphic.png (1171x1143, 162K)

ok

Attached: 7a5.gif (482x800, 29K)

>equating stalin and marx
Yikes

Attached: 5e7d2681f41320c669f59325845d3b7b64556d26_full.jpg (184x184, 7K)

>twisting others' words to make them easier to attack
oof

Not twisting anything
"tfw you see "woke" American college kids think Stalin and Marx were cool guys who fought for freedom and against oppression"

>stalin and marx

One of these people encouraged fighting oppression. One was an oppressor rallying behind that mantra.

I never implied they were same
I implied college students view them in this light

I mean when I was in uni I never...viewed them in the same light. I was even a sociology major.

I think that's just a Jow Forums meme.

tankies are beyond saving for sure. but you make it sound like marx didn’t have good ideas

Attached: getting tired of your shit.jpg (160x229, 8K)

We should definitely eat the rich

it's an American college student meme
ask your country's snowflakes why they suck these guys' dicks all the time

It's the same reason the alt-right exists, it's two sides of the same coin. The government sucks, there's social strife, people recognize that things are wrong and could be far better.

One side blames minorities, jews, immigrants, what have you

Another blames capitalism and how that wealth is distributed. And what the people with the wealth do to ensure the status quo remains that way.

That being said, tankies are retarded for sure, but I don't think they make up any sort of majority thought in american universities at all.

Marx did have some ok ideas, but in essence basically incited gullible goys against bourgeoise to subvert their countries
that's all he did but naive Westerners are still in denial because Christianity taught them doing things for profit is not OK and the poor are entitled to gibs and it's definitely gonna work this time because it's never been tried

no they put them in the same line because of leftist propaganda in colleges and media
also I never said tankies were in US. lefties in US simply paint socialism in entirely positive light while denying or dismissing everything bad about it. that's why they somehow believe Stalin was "woke"

>Another blames capitalism and how that wealth is distributed.
and they somehow manage to be more retarded than
>One side blames minorities, jews, immigrants, what have you
its a fucking miracle to behold to be absolutely honest with you

i have yet to meet a tankie who thinks doing things for profit is bad. i think it’s more about not being exploited by corporations whose best interests are always contrary to your best interests

>i have yet to meet a tankie who thinks doing things for profit is bad
except it's literally every tankie.
>i think it’s more about not being exploited by corporations whose best interests are always contrary to your best interests
I think it's more about not realizing that society is made of selfish interests and the special interests of the "poor" are in no way better or less selfish than of corporations, and redistribution simply favors one group over another while also empowering an authoritarian government that has its own selfish interests
it's also about not realizing that providing for other while asking nothing in return is not a sound economic policy and taking it with force is basically same exploitation and being for "greater good" doesn't make it better

>society is made of selfish interests
i think it’s more that scarcity pits people against each other. the vested interest in our survival is what caused prehistoric man to work together. i don’t think there’s any reason to believe competitive drives would override that vested interest in all cases.

scarcity always exists. there's scarcity of bread, cars, etc. because they're not unlimited. someone has to make them and be compensated for labor. you know what isn't scarce? air.
this commune approach fails because there's bound to be a conflict of interest even in smallest group because resources are not air. the most efficient way to distribute them has been based on free market principle.
the question is not "why are you so selfish"; the question is "why the fuck you think you're entitled to it when you don't you give back enough in return".
people in commune approach are asked to sacrifice themselves for others, which is basically parasitism of others on individual. this kind of altruism can exist though. but it requires complete and total trust and definite necessity. it is something that is seen as the ultimate way to build society in Christian dogma. but the truth is, it's only truly achieved between a parent and a baby, or with a wife, because if evolutionary advantage to continue family.
you can treat close friends like this, but it's not like you're gonna gift them a lot of money or something. this is just not normal; what are they, your baby? and even then, it's mutualism. one doesn't just give for free, they get something in return, like future favors, or at least they get company. if they don't get something, they naturally feel betrayed and quit. this relationship rests on a code of conduct. on assumption that people will get equal benefits, and manage losses. it's not just giving selflessly.
the bigger the group, the less certain promise of return becomes, if only because of size and management hardships. it needs accountability system. it exists. it's called money. don't have money but promise something later? there's credit and debt.
finally, what if the group demands something to remain strong? then why don't they pay for it. if they don't want to pay money for it, then perhaps they don't value the group much to begin with.

Hey /b/ros help me find the origin of this pic

Attached: drawing16.png (1280x661, 443K)

mods are asleep, post sinks

Attached: 1187.png (457x487, 269K)

irregardless isn't a word

Attached: 0199.jpg (222x222, 57K)

I dont love man holes

Attached: 0598.jpg (960x540, 114K)

work hard and your dream will be rewarded

Attached: 0875.png (560x670, 361K)

here's your (you)

Attached: 0802.jpg (454x340, 75K)