do you know "PythagoraSwitch"? ungetter pls google it.
so....we are believing "consciousness"is just of virous materials. i thought It might be base of base in Eeath.
your opinion.
i have my goal to talk now.continue now!
Dominic Edwards
what the fuck
Cameron Baker
Im continuing,so that..say about next 1,As Ted vdieo,Things what go to more Biggers with mate....are difinetlly collapsed by Earth Power. 2.A More bigger group with mate are Automatically be attacked by Earth Power.
3,A more biggers difenetlly cant stop Internal collapse by Earth Power.
4....
Brayden Wilson
大丈夫か? 頭が混乱してるようだが
Isaiah Fisher
>so....we are believing "consciousness"is just of virous materials. so....we are believing "consciousness"is just "PythagoraSwitch" of virious materials.
Josiah Ortiz
what the fuck
Xavier Turner
oh doki moki poki UwWwaaa~~ un daisku desu mucho pueblo marracas uwu desu~ desu~ knoichowa ohio~~~
before 4....What based power of those"PythagoraSwitch"?
Not to mention,Atmospheric, water pressure, Magnetic field, gravity,, espesyally as me attentio, 'Earth Rotation' 'Earth revolution'and "Earth Spiral motion" like this.
>do you know "PythagoraSwitch"? yes, it's actually called en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rube_Goldberg_machine >your opinion that this sort of discussion belongs in /sci/, but your english level is too embarassing to talk there so here you are ps: i'm a theist, so i'm positive life and intelligence didn't happen over some snowball effect
Asher Lopez
So they're talking about intelligent life? I also find it extremely unlike for other intelligent life such as us to exist in our universe. Sure there's obviously life on other planets but not as intelligent as us, like how the earth had dinosaurs before us, or planets with only plants. Development of extremely intelligent life like us is really rare, think about how out of the 8th millions of species on our planet only one has the intelligence to create a language and complex tools. There a lot of requirements for complex life to exist, and to that you have to add the requirements for an extremely intelligent form of life to exist. Maybe there's a higher being that planned our existence, surely we can't be the results of some random events and coincidences
Levi Ward
>BIG Question:Why large has been the collapse of all in the history??
Its Time shortening so..my opinion is "EARTH having Absolute capacity"absolute existence.。
so, Now Zio*ist-chan's any suffering comes against this absolute existence.i suppose.
how about user? lets All user with thinking i have a goal personality. in my pocket
Landon King
chemicals can't create life. hell, even if you took a bunch of amino acids or even fully formed cell organelles and put them in a test tube, they won't form cells. the idea that perfectly structured chains of amino acids aligned themselves in some 'primordial ooze' is unscientific and invalidated
Hudson Diaz
wtf, i HATE my high school education now!
Connor Ross
didn't watch the whole shit but it was talking about creating Artificial Life and how indistinct from uhm.. "regular" life it would be they're doing baby steps so for now they're programming unicellular beings. they have the advantage of (depending on processing power) speed up the process to see if they can REcreate life as we have it now. and yeah, they didn't achieve it yet then OP started mentioning AKIRA but i didn't see any reference, it's only in his mind
Sebastian Kelly
How the fuck do they understand each other? Nothing makes any fuckity sense in this thread
Thomas Martinez
They can, we ARE chemicals >The Miller–Urey experiment[1] (or Miller experiment)[2] was a chemical experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time to be present on the early Earth, and tested the chemical origin of life under those conditions. The experiment supported Alexander Oparin's and J. B. S. Haldane's hypothesis that putative conditions on the primitive Earth favoured chemical reactions that synthesized more complex organic compounds from simpler inorganic precursors. >Conditions similar to those of the Miller–Urey experiments are present in other regions of the solar system, often substituting ultraviolet light for lightning as the energy source for chemical reactions.[30][31][32] The Murchison meteorite that fell near Murchison, Victoria, Australia in 1969 was found to contain over 90 different amino acids, nineteen of which are found in Earth life. Comets and other icy outer-solar-system bodies are thought to contain large amounts of complex carbon compounds (such as tholins) formed by these processes, darkening surfaces of these bodies.[33] The early Earth was bombarded heavily by comets, possibly providing a large supply of complex organic molecules along with the water and other volatiles they contributed.[34] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller–Urey_experiment
That experiment only formed really simple organic molecules. We are way more complex than that, like for example our mithochondrias are actually ancient bacteria that an ancestor of our cells assimilated in order to be able to synthetise energy using oxygen, which is way more efficient than anaerobic respiration and allowed them to grow bigger
Christian Wilson
i think no^^,but today i thought to talk rightly but its need to discuss details. what would do? Thank you for various opinion this is valuable.
Grayson Wood
reading everyone user post. unun interested...
Asher Foster
the whole abiogenesis theory has been pretty much on the backburner thanks to the failure of that experiment. miller himself couldn't defend the criticisms against it. for one, the environmental conditions of the experiment didn't reflect the conditions of a 'primitive' earth. but again, it wouldn't matter because the d amino acids cancels the l amino acids and amino acids don't align themselves anyway. there's no mechanism for them to align themselves because for that to happen you'd need dna
Jonathan Butler
fumm, How is this? Setting a detail discuss aside,My hypothesis continue with the story.how?
a! Paraguay-kun could you translate me?after this
Jacob Ramirez
intelligent design seems to be the most acceptable answer. there's no other rational explanation. if life is by random chance then the laws of physics itself might as well be random and chaotic. and a tornado should be able to rip through a junkyard and build a rolls royce
Grayson Hill
seriously? There is no demand.. it'll better to stop?
Brandon Carter
people on Jow Forums seem to be less opinionated because there's less americans. maybe try posting it on Jow Forums if you want more discussion about it
Xavier Ross
>there's no other rational explanation i wanna say,about 3?things. 1,It doesn't matter if A object intend to or not,The growing object get to increase collision partner from outside.
.2,
Isaac Thomas
翻訳したくない。面倒すぎ。 you want to practice your english so you translate it as much as you can
>Jow Forums discussing about science please no if only OP's english wasn't such a problem he ought to go to that's the place
Michael Watson
2.As like a "Ted video" If the set of matter movement called "Human" ,The Earth also called "creature" .i think.
3,
Zachary Myers
あははw i feel you.. let me post here ok?
Leo Turner
Interesting thread.
Ian Rogers
I post japanese simply,you translate to post in English. 面倒すぎ?
Nolan Clark
はい、面倒すぎる。 finish what you started here you've got 2000 characters