Brits haven't overthrown their government and install Charles as the absolute king yet

>

Attached: 24556256.jpg (570x558, 260K)

he wants to take an active role in politics, Charles will usher us into a new golden age

Attached: prince charles.jpg (964x822, 117K)

Emperor Charles.

he will die a princess

You can have him if you want.

Kek

the only strong opinion he has is on skyscrapers

Based, fuck skyscrapers

>monarkids

Attached: image.jpg (659x420, 181K)

>Do you love each other
>Diana: Of Course
>Charles:...Whatever "in love" means
Chad

>republicucks

Attached: 1534768416135.png (520x1339, 245K)

>"For the past 15 years I have been entirely motivated by a desperate desire to put the “Great” back into Great Britain. Everything I have tried to do—all the projects, speeches, schemes, etc.—have been with this end in mind. And none of it has worked, as you can see too obviously! In order to put the “Great” back I have always felt it was vital to bring people together, and I began to realise that the one advantage my position has over anyone else’s is that I can act as a catalyst to help produce a better and more balanced response to various problems. I have no “political” agenda—only a desire to see people achieve their potential; to be decently housed in a decent, civilised environment that respects the cultural and vernacular character of the nation; to see this country’s real talents (especially inventiveness and engineering skills) put to best use in the best interests of the country and the world (at present they are being disgracefully wasted through lack of co-ordination and strategic thinking); to retain and value the infrastructure and cultural integrity of rural communities (where they still exist) because of the vital role they play in the very framework of the nation and the care and management of the countryside; to value and nurture the highest standards of military integrity and professionalism, as displayed by our armed forces, because of the role they play as an insurance scheme in case of disaster; and to value and retain our uniquely special broadcasting standards which are renowned throughout the world. The final point is that I want to roll back some of the more ludicrous frontiers of the 60s in terms of education, architecture, art, music, and literature, not to mention agriculture! Having read this through, no wonder they want to destroy me, or get rid of me…!"

-The Prince of Wales, in a 1993 letter to Tom Shebbeare, then director of the Prince's Trust

Attached: The-Rake-Prince-Charles-7.jpg (900x902, 103K)

AVE IMPERATOR

My main problem with monarchy is the fact that the only dynasties ruling in Europe - Are French (two or three) and German (the rest).
Monarchy only works if planned eugenistically like in Crusader Kings 2. Otherwise, your dynasty gets eaten by the Germans, like it happened to Romanovs.

All three pretenders to the Polish throne - Wettins, Żywiec Habsbergers and "Romanovs" - Are Germans.

Also, the fact that most "monarchists" support crowned republics, and not real monarchies like those of Asia or Liechtenstein/Monaco (biggest power of all European "monarchies"). Monarchy, by definition, requires an autocratic ruler.

Reminder Carlists and Stuarts are current legitimist monarchies for Great Britain and Spain. Majority of British "monarchists" are phonies.

Soon

Attached: 57298377592375.png (1200x616, 137K)

i hope he orders the destruction of a few of them

You know they tried to tempt him into being the Premier of Austarlia, I see why now.

This guy is the best of the lot

Attached: 1152176_v9_ba.jpg (1080x1440, 253K)

Um sweetie

Attached: image.jpg (356x450, 32K)

Add Salazar's New State

The Hasburgs were honestly pretty good

Also, strange you put fascism there. Fascism, as an ideology derived from socialism, is extremely anti-monarchist.
There were very few social-monarchies in general. I can think of Japan, but Tojo had actual power there.

Philip is worshipped as a God on some South Pacific Island

Attached: prince-philip-movement.jpg (968x681, 111K)

>tfw this based man has to deal with Harry

>Drunkard Hooligans
>Land of cuckoldry and libtardness
>Abos
>Land of flightless birds
Wow, so this is the might of the """United""" Kingdom of """""""Great""""""" Britain and Northern Ireland

They were good for Spain. I feel it was shame they lost the war of succession.
Żywiec Habsburgs would fit us the most out of the three.
In case Germans won the civil war, they planned to give us back Kingdom of Poland held by Russia, lead by that dynasty. It was Proto-IIRP.

>Fascism, as an ideology derived from socialism, is extremely anti-monarchist.
perhaps in some branches but british fascism "Mosleyism" is pro monarchy

Both Mussolini and Mosley supported their monarchies though

nah Tojo was prime minister only for 1941-1944 and all he did was guided by the emperor, in practice Hirohito had absolute power though he didnt order directly

You'd be delusional to say it wouldn' t be a nice to live.

you like a lot of other people underestimate how strong a united canzuk would be

I heard that during Tony Blair's era Charles would send tons of letters of "sugestions" and Tony Blair would simply throw than in the bin without reading

Need to work on that abbreviation

>Mussolini
Only as long as it was convenient. Fascism inherently has this forward-looking modernist narrative and forward-looking, support for monarchy is necessarily traditionalist.

tony "war criminal" blair is one of the wort pms we've ever had

youtube.com/watch?v=hnnXKmGQ4nI

youtube.com/watch?v=zITpU225cG4

Charles is FAR, FAR more redpilled than the public realises.
Just to put this in context: the man Charles admires, and is well educated on, is René Guénon, founder of the Traditionalist School of thought. The same Traditionalist School which Julius Evola was a part of.

Attached: Prince Charles Kilt - SMW Home.png (587x923, 788K)

To give him a credit, he is also friendly towards Orthodoxy and is member of Friends of Mount Athos society, so kudos for that, I guess.

>war of succession.
One of the most important yet underrated events in history

I heard some people even on Jow Forums that told me he was okay in terms of internal affairs

Domestically he was pretty meh. Not the worst at least.
His international policies were fucking disastrous though, and far outweighed any 'good' he might have done.

So can Charles join the government and become prime minister. Or is he not allowed to? I have no idea how the British government works. It seems like such a mess

no but he could just dissolve parliament and rule by decree

No, he can't. We're a constitutional monarchy, he has no legal power.
>It seems like such a mess
It's genuinely pretty straight-forward.

Parliament over the years has stripped away almost all the legal power of the monarchy to have any power over government. Even the power to dissolve parliament was stripped in 2011

But that's just the legalistic approach. Power resides where men believe it resides, so if Charles had enough people backing him over parliament, he could do what he wanted

>We're a constitutional monarchy
>No, we dont have a Constitution. why do you ask?

>so if Charles had enough people backing him over parliament, he could do what he wanted
I'm going to assume he doesn't

I’m getting tired of waiting lads, I want to see King Charles III in my lifetime

Attached: 72FF785C-3BB9-4192-998F-1E2814FBCB41.jpg (1639x2048, 516K)

>No, we dont have a Constitution. why do you ask?
Meme perpetuated by the ignorant.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poundbury
does anyone live here? How nice is it?

>this fucking meme again
we have a fucking constitution its just uncodified

Attached: apu punch2.jpg (785x757, 30K)

I thought you mostly had piles of agreements piled upon another and the ceremonies surrounding The king/queen and Parlament hold it together.

looks like the kind of comfy South-coast village that's great to retire to if you have money saved up, and shit if you're young and looking for work.

Hard to say. Parliament isn't exactly super popular. Though Charles isn't either

If William wanted to take over, I fully believe he could get away with it easily. He has the people's support

Okay brits what would you do if every member of the royal family died except for Harry?

I was just about to post about that. Check it out on Google Maps and you'll get the picture. Lefties despise it.

BASED

Attached: 1519773572453.jpg (900x675, 61K)

It’s a shame the monarchy and the lords have been stripped of their powers. God, I hate republican politicians

Kill Harry and claim the throne by right of conquest.

Oh so he's the popular one

Mosley was a pro-Irish faggot

>Lefties despise it.
not surprised

yeah, the British proles adore Will, Kate and their kids

>faggot
fuck off yank

paddy

Britain needs a Tudur revival.

The Anglo is a beast without a firm Brythonic hand to guide him.

Attached: tudordragon.png (813x1024, 363K)

Every British political party has been tainted by Whiggism. The removal of monarchical powers have come from the Liberal, Labour/New Labour and "Conservative" parties

Indeed, because it's the only area of Britain where things like this are being built.

Attached: ac19664522aee8ea27ff12dae65e8ca1[1].jpg (1024x525, 97K)

And everywhere else is just brutalism?

Would this be considered neo-classicsm?

>T*durs
Literally the worst dynasty that ruled England

Attached: 9631333D-4E22-41FB-B75B-679C567799D9.png (853x620, 77K)

Bugger off, Henry was 1/8th Welsh at best and used the Welsh as pawns/support base nothing else. Once he claimed the crown he never cared for Welsh interests and never spoke a word of Welsh again.

Attached: 1540949754666.jpg (3969x2475, 1.41M)

nah brutalism is long gone now its just DUDE GLASS AND METAL LMAO, theres no soul in modern architecture

England's golden age came under the Tudors

>please take away all my political rights daddy monarch, I want to be dominated by Nobels!

Imagine being this cucked

>In a speech given for the 150th anniversary of the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) on 30 May 1984, he memorably described a proposed extension to the National Gallery in London as a "monstrous carbuncle on the face of a much-loved friend" and deplored the "glass stumps and concrete towers" of modern architecture. He asserted that "it is possible, and important in human terms, to respect old buildings, street plans and traditional scales and at the same time not to feel guilty about a preference for facades, ornaments and soft materials," called for local community involvement in architectural choices, and asked: >Why can't we have those curves and arches that express feeling in design? What is wrong with them? Why has everything got to be vertical, straight, unbending, only at right angles – and functional?
>His book and BBC documentary A Vision of Britain (1987) was also critical of modern architecture, and he has continued to campaign for traditional urbanism, human scale, restoration of historic buildings, and sustainable design
So based. It's a shame he's the only man doing this

Ah yes, being dominated by Jews and capitalists who have no concern for the people of their nation is so much better because of “muh vote”

the average person is a politically ignorant moron who doesn't deserve the right to vote, enjoy being cucked by the tyranny of the majority

>tf
>tp

>monarchs
>not jews and capitalists
Lol

They literally aren’t Jews, show me Queen Elizabeth’s Jewish ancestors.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild was Victoria’s father

But by judaic law the mother defines jewishness. Male descent does not count.

lmaoooo i'm literally dying

>cucks.
Charles is a literal cuckold, though.

Why did the Queen have Diana killed?

They were good for Brazil

Nah, Diana was just a cheating whore, Charlie is no cuckhold.
She was going to marry a Muslim, or something like that

Is it true Harry isn't his son? Why don't you guys just make them do a paternity test?

She was an embarrassment

>Diana claims to reveal the first words out of her husband's mouth, saying: "First comment was: 'Oh God, it's a boy', second comment: 'and he's even got red hair.'
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA