Do you believe the Out Of African theory, user?

no. peking man was found in china and is older than african

Yes
I may be cursed with wh*Te skin, but I have the fierce soul of a BLACK warrior

>Do you believe the Out Of African theory, user?
No because it was disproven a full decade ago, schools are just always 50 years behind scientific developments. Current theories place human civilization beginning in East Asia or possibly even the Americas (the theory that the native americans crossed over into the americas via a landbridge from siberia to alaska has also been disproven).

Damn, your gov doesn't censor this site?

>the theory that the native americans crossed over into the americas via a landbridge from siberia to alaska has also been disproven).
are you getting this from genetiker?

not when he's arguing that human civilization began in his country

#weareallchinamen

It was always a theory, to have a starting point for further discoveries.
Same with Big Bang.
Oldest humanoid bones where found in africa, so they stick to it for several decades.
But as I mentioned before, they found older ones already in asia.

theguardian.com/science/2016/aug/10/earliest-americans-could-not-have-arrived-by-dry-land-study-indicates

sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150427145121.htm

Out of the Middle East

It's important to mention, however, that just because the oldest humanoid bones today originate in Asia it shouldn't be believed that that's the origin of humanity. In another 10 or 20 years I'm sure we'll find even older bones from another area of the world just as we have been doing for the past 100 years.

>it shouldn't be believed that that's the origin of humanity
Never said that.
It just replaced the old theory with the newest one.

Scientific method works that way. You formulate a falsifible hypothesis and compare it with available data. If it has enough descriptive/predictive power, it becomes theory. Science is a never finished, it’s work in progress.

I wish more people understood this. Scientific literacy is important if you don’t want to become lost in the modern world.

I guess, Hominids have always gone back and forth from Africa and Asia though.

No, we came out of Brazil.

What does that have to do with an Out of America theory?

Those are still pretty limited finds, even the ones found in Asia mentioned ITT. Vast majority of early human remains still point to the Horn of Africa as the original site of human evolution.

Ouranopithecus was found in Europe, but that was a common ancestor of humans and chimps, so it's technically a part of Hominidae, but not hominini.

It didn’t. Out of Africa is still a dominant one.

Nothing, you asked where I got my information from regarding the sibero-alaskan landbridge and I answered.

I think this is the big issue people aren’t getting ITT. Human relatives =/= humans.

alright

I understand this progress.
And I also know that a shitload of scientist just deny or remove every piece which doesnt fit into their big puzzle.
Its understandable to a certain degree though.
Imagine spending 40+years to fill a theory with life and proofs, everything just fits together and suddenly they found something which destroys all your work...

You didn't get the memo ? It's (probably) out of north africa now

Attached: out of north africa.jpg (795x578, 60K)

Yeah and the reasons for this are mentioned here

Yes, the amount of fossil evidence and samples that stretches across the entire human ancestor genealogy

just one thing does not destroy all the work, it is considered an abnormality, an exception, the theory still stands learn2scientific method faggot

No, I believe in the out of garden of eden FACT

>Muh Out Of Africa theory

It was proven back in May 2017 that we came from the balkans

news.artsci.utoronto.ca/all-news/scientists-identify-7-2-million-year-old-pre-human-remains-balkans/

sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm

telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

sputniknews.com/europe/201705241053918896-prehuman-remains-older-than-thought/

Attached: 6201-004-805F3655.jpg (647x506, 96K)

>billions of evidence poiting towards the out of africa theory
>one evidence poiting against
>DEBUNKED GUISE

Attached: 1516500957053.png (2492x1480, 1.3M)

or did we come from brazil ?

Attached: 1547084061284.webm (198x360, 2.93M)

Who the fuck cares, the only people that mention it as if it matters are braindead American afrocentrists and insecure Jow Forumstards

That's Ouranopithecus though, which was more Chimp like than human like.

The genetic angle doesn’t match North Africa, though you are right that the Jebel Irhoud find changes the narrative.

Attached: 0854BF72-E4C2-4341-9645-8483BBB71811.jpg (889x635, 110K)

I think the monkey in you is speaking:
>we found the oldest bones so far in africa
>lets take this as a starting point
>we call it out of africa THEORY
>oh, we found older ones in asia
You:
Doesnt prove shit, still africa!

You should try and have more respect, different than you, I am an actual biologist, and just by your post I can see you do not know the meaning of the word "theory" in science, so you should make use of your first world education and actually try to study instead of spitting shit on the internet, twat.

I'd rather believe the Brazil theory than the Balkans theory.

>You should try and have more respect
>learn2scientific method faggot
>faggot

Ok. You are not the brightest candle on the cake...

>I am an actual biologist
Hahahahaha, look at him!

Attached: 1546981162259.jpg (869x1112, 50K)

It's not a matter of faith, and the evidence is not definitive

test

did it work dubster?