Kek Brazil

Brazilian Private Companies are absolute dogshit and collapsed in 2015-2016

You're a cute

Attached: 1547145793124.jpg (1000x1000, 244K)

Jesus I literally thought that it would never happen in this socialist minded country
Internet is definitely the best thing that ever happened to humanity, it literally helps to collapse politics mafias

Source: My ass

It's utter retardation that we even have that many state companies to sell.

Most of them don't even do anything and have no way of being profitable, they're just there to give family and friends free jobs, whoever tries to run them with private money will just go bankrupt (and that's a good thing).

Attached: 1541438530224.jpg (1024x1280, 219K)

Based.

Brazil will unironically start to develop because of this
This is too good to be true

Based, hope something like that happens in Russia as well

It makes no difference if the company is state-owned or private when its a corrupt wasteland of a country as Brazil.

>”Brazilian nationalists” lining up to let foreign capital buy up their economy

Those companies aren't the economy, they are useless job hangers leeching our tax money, just another symptom of corruption.

Those companies wouldn't even exist if the government didn't create them to begin with, they have no purpose.

private companies by the naturality of free-market penalizes corruption, state-owned companies in the other hand isnt even insered in the free-market to get any disadvantage by doing this

>selling Brazilian assets to foreigners and cucking yourself to the US and IMF instead of just reforming the company leadership

In Russia state-owned companies are more efficient than those were privatized in the 90s, but less effective than new private companies.

>private companies by the naturality of free-market penalizes corruption
The “free market” is just legalized corruption.

Attached: C5B2CD77-28A2-4647-944E-F11B9B68BEBD.png (305x300, 181K)

You live in a free market country, dude.

Foreigners won't buy that crap and even if they did they would still have to pay corporate taxes, and if they manage to make the companies actually profitable then it's a win-win (no more wasted tax money and better services)

amp.ft.com/content/17bd7ffa-3944-11e6-9a05-82a9b15a8ee7

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-21/oi-bankruptcy-sends-shockwaves-through-brazil-s-financial-system

mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSL1N1ET0VU

Sources

you don't understand, nigger
these companies are taking too much from the State and not giving much in return, if we sell them, we can use the money in heavily important areas like health and public security
we still have commies and socialists elected, we can't do everything we want, we have to do what we can to stop communism and socialism and help capitalism for us to grow our country
we have more than 60k homicides per year
NO COUNTRY is in a similar situation, you can't compare us anymore with any other country

Kill yourself dumbass kid, go live in a commie country before trying to talk about the "evils of capitalism".

or Bolsonaro does that in OP
or we go full dictatorship and get the robbed money back from communist hands, especially from Cuba

Leon
Moonrise kingdom

Most companies (public and private) are absolute shit here due to the absolutely crushing amount of bureaucracy, fees and taxes, it's one of the worst places in the world to run a business.

>Japan: 8

amp.businessinsider.com/the-japanese-government-owns-a-massive-amount-of-japanese-companies-2016-8

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Government-owned_companies_of_Japan
Wikipedia lists about 20.

They weren't exactly stellar before thatcher either. Besides, you can't call any of our privatised public services truly private, considering the government either owns half the assets and merely rents it out (electric, rail) or continually interferes with the companies every time they are a little bit successful (BT, Royal Mail).

???????
I dont understand how do you think its better to let the politicians take control of a company by nationalizing it. It's so much easier to stole money from the company for political interests by doing this, plus the service will be utter shit because the state can't attend the population demand, unlike the free-market.

This, why does no one see this cautionary tale?

>this flag

Can we swap countries if you hate free market so much?

Based. All tankies here are stupid kids who live in Canada, USA, Western Europe etc.

Because state owned enterprise when done well and properly overseen by the public is better than private enterprise. Public ownership ensures that the funds stay in the country and are used for the public good. What you need is drives against corruption and reviews of efficiency of your public companies. Instead privatizing your companies is just going to empower foreign owners and allow them to extract wealth from your country. You complain when corrupt politicians enrich themselves from public corporations but don’t seem to care when private owners enrich themselves from private companies, and do so legally.

Your country is literally mostly tankies m8.

Who cares? I will not pay any public money for this

based President Balogna

>Public ownership ensures that the funds stay in the country and are used for the public good.
Meanwhile in reality...

Attached: 23987163281337431d02b6726673e174.jpg (620x420, 237K)

I'm glad that garbage semi-died, what a shitty company.

Canada has a bigger public sector than Brazil.

>private companies by the naturality of free-market penalizes corruption,

Attached: 66CFE5C9-34E9-4259-98DF-5DCF10E50BA4.jpg (557x930, 43K)

They are not. People just nostalgic about the past, when we were strong, etc. Nobody wants to return to a planned economy when you have nothing to eat, not to mention other needs.

The Soviet Union turned your country from one of the most backwards in Europe to a superpower. It was also a repressive shithole before the revolution, except it was repressive AND underdeveloped.

Ah yes, those damn corrupt state enterprises, unlike muh perfectly incorruptible private companies like Odebrecht and JBS

I doubt it. Fake news. Prove it.

is that the opposite of
>ehpropiese

"youtube.com/watch?v=jOjvJAfIMSI

>Nobody wants to return to a planned economy when you have nothing to eat
Except the Soviet Union had first world levels of calorie consumption.
cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf

youtube.com/watch?v=jOjvJAfIMSI

>Because state owned enterprise when done well and properly overseen by the public is better than private enterprise.

This will NEVER happen in Latin America. I don't want to wait honest people falling from sky to eork in public jobs anymore.

Attached: 1547124680647.png (1511x2015, 2.49M)

The cautionary tale is: Don't give governments power. Keep the power in the hands of the people.

I bet you defend paying TV license as well you fucking imbeciles.

>Bolsonaro is a nazi! B-Brazil will collapse any second n-
forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2019/01/08/brazil-is-the-best-stock-market-in-the-world-right-now/

Attached: Dapper Dabber.gif (554x400, 45K)

OECD estimates Brazil’s public sector to be about 12% and Canada’s at 22% of GDP.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_sector

>cucking out to corporations is “keeping power in the hands of the people”
It’s less an issue of more or less government than it is of who actually controls the government.

In the Russian Empire for 100 years were executed less people than in the USSR sometimes in a one day.
>superpower.
laugh

Attached: socialistparadise.jpg (700x393, 76K)

Bolsonaro is a nazi, but nazis are socialists, therefore left-wing and communists. Reminder that the best commie removers are commies themselves.

Imagine actually believing this.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_repression_in_the_Soviet_Union

>It was also a repressive shithole before the revolution, except it was repressive AND underdeveloped.
correct
>The Soviet Union turned your country from one of the most backwards in Europe to a superpower.
wrong

russians always suffered. but stalin was worse than the czars.

How long until Brazil inevitably crashes and burns?

Half a year? Less?

>For example, the number of victims under Joseph Stalin's regime vary from 642,980 to 61 million.[5][24][25][26][27][28]
Lmao.

You seem to defend a social-democrat system. The problem with the social-democracy is that even you don't have corrupt politicians with good intentions (this by itself is already hard in a statist system that don't penalize who do fucking nothing in the government and only live at the costs of taxes), is that it will NEVER meet the demand as well as private companies because it doesn't have competition. How the state will possibly know what is good for the population, what every single individual wants, if it doesn't have a competition as a quality parameter? The result is that after some point this system collapses. It depends at how rich the state is to sustain this economic anomaly, and this situation we are already seeing in Europe countries (UK is already in debt with its state services, for example). The welfare state is such a beautiful thing in the paper, but only lasts 'till the state economy start to drain.

It crashed and burned a couple of years ago.

Well the world economy will probably crash this year or the next, and Bolsonaro will probably do a shit job of handling it.

Why? Bolsonaro barely have any oposition.

You will when you bail them out

ITT people who unironically use terms like "neoliberal" and "trickle-down economics".

And this is not free-market friend, it's a result of corporativism, which uses the capitalism to sustain the state. Know the difference.

642.980 those who are directly shot. The rest died of starvation, labor camps, deportation, etc. A realistic estimate is 20-30 million.

Who's bolsonaro's bogeyman?
for trump it is the illegals.

If you are so fixated on muh competition then you can integrate competitive mechanisms into the operation of a single enterprise.

God I wish that were me

>lmao
that's all you got? then prove him wrong, faggot

"Gender ideology" and commies/petistas.

Someone tell to this dumb Canadian
social-democracy will never work in places like Latin America?

You must have honest politicians to a system like that works. The world is not Sim City, my dear Trudeau.

Attached: dhw7.jpg (480x360, 14K)

Wrong

Your country and people are awful for business because they are uneducated violent religious mutts

The commies that were in power for 13 years and absolutely wrecked the country.

The point being that the numbers vary so widely it’s ridiculous.

So Spain had double digit unemployment because you're subhumans, and not due to the socio-economic context of the time?

Most private services in this country for my experience are God-tier, hospitals, malls, etc.

Oh my. 20. Brazil has almost 500, same thing, am I right?

I'll definetely go back if he legalizes gun ownership.

Attached: 1543501681191.png (1508x984, 606K)

No man, competition doesn't exist when you have an only enterpise operating. You don't have any other options of services, forcing you to get this one even if you don't like it. This is not free will.

It seems they're only going to remove the RNG diceroll aspect of owning guns, you're still going to have to take tests, pay tariffs and have severe restrictions on ammo type/quantity available plus there's no way we'll get concealed carry ever.

I said it the moment i've read Bolsonaro's program, way before its election.
Now this will happen:
>Brazilians will cheer him for a year (or two?)
>Brazilians realize they're paying three times as much for the same services, but Bolsonaro says something "based" once in a while to keep the hype up, therefore...
>...Brazilians cope: "At least those lazy, public employees lost their jobs. Take that, macacos"
>Lower-middle/Middle/High-middle class Brazilians realize being productive members of society won't keep the new system from jewing them to shreds...
>but it's too late

Currency terms it is not

This also ignores the fact the stock market fell 70%. Not hard to recoup lost ground

He's doing presidential decrees to make owning guns as easy as he can make them but changing carry laws will have to go through congress which is painfully slow.

Oh, like what you are doing? Are you going to defend socialism to Russians? Let me talk shit about your country too.

But there's no such thing as "free-market" in the world, at least not today, and I doubt it will ever exist while the current oligarchical structure exists. If anything, huge conglomerates will either keep corrupting political power to act in their favour or they will simply cut the middle man and take political power for themselves.

We had a small wave of privatization in the 90s and the reality was the opposite of that. Phone services were retardedly expensive and hard to get and after 1998 Brazil was the country in which phone services spread the fastest in the world.

Lol no

t. Rightwinger here

It's at all-time highs.

>the bloody mines dave. loved em I did