1. country
2, what would you do in this scenario
1. country
depends on who is on each track
make it run over the 5 people, i want as many people to suffer as possible
I'd yeet them all to safety
based
Choosing to kill the individual makes you a murderer. letting the five die leaves you a bystander and absolves you of any guilt or responsibility
based
I would need to know the back story of each person tied to the rails.
Killing the biggest amount of people i could
based
This.
kek
Are they favelados
If so, I agree.
based and redpilled
based
Nothing. Not my problem. Being able to act and doing nothing is not the same as acting to mitigate a "problem". To many assumptions going on here :
1. death is a bad thing
2. the people on the tracks deserve to be saved
3. 5 people dying is worse than 1 dying
All fiction
i would poop on their faces, it has been my child hood dream to poop on people :(.
Probably do the five, because there is more of a chance of being impure races among them.
based and pomo-pilled
have the trolley run over the 5 people and stomp the last one to death myself
t. Zhang Zhing Zhong
fixed
taking decisions is a spook
calling something a spook is to take a decision
>death is a bad thing
yes, why do brianwash so strong that euthanasia is bad
>via 9gag.com
why dont u make it six by sleeping next to the other 5?
fuck i just googled it
Run over five people twice and then over the guy on the other track too.
> what would you do in this scenario
doing nothing gives positive results, sometimes
THIS
why westerners love this question
"do something to stop if you can or do nothing" is the right answer imo.
kill that one guy and call him a martyr and hero
send survivors to labor camps
But what if that one person would suffer much more than the sum of the people if you had driven over him, then wouldn't it be better to run over him?
multi-track drifting
They won't suffer if they are dead