Why is all human history basically the history of the Middle East, Europe, China and India? How come Africa, the Americas and Australasia are basically irrelevant?
Why is all human history basically the history of the Middle East, Europe, China and India? How come Africa...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Isolation.
isolation
subhuman wh*toid
must be bait
based AND BLACKpilled
Elaborate
Okay, I'll throw in the horn of Africa
>India
not relevant
the only impact they had on the world was a lot of stupid religions
inferior people live in those parts of the world
Africa is a barren shithole with few people and isolated from the Mediterranean sea and Middle-East by the Sahara (you probably heard of it)
Australia has a desert between its decent lands and SE Asia. New Zealand is an island far away.
The Americas are a whole continent the rest of the world had no idea about, the knowledge of its inhabitants is all self made
>all human history
Ancient Mexico had such a thing as a written history, if you don't see so much as a Mayan pyramid in a world history course then the fault lies with your *******education*******
Are you actually dumb or did you post this for the purpose of killing another thread?
How am I dumb, explain
In what way are the Americas irrelevant to human history?
>Why is all human history basically the history of the Middle East, Europe?*
Fixed.
In what way are they relevant? Nothing has influenced the world from the Americas in my opinion. I considere European colonisation and it's consequences to be European.
Natives barely exist anymore. They've been replaced by europeans / mutts. They lost the continents competition kek
Mayans aren't even Mexican. You're thinking about the Aztec.
Usa alone liberated europe of nazis and then rebuilt it
he's obviously talking about pre columbian americas
We don't want to be part of world history
t. Indigenous
N
I
xD