PISA 2015

Singapore tops latest OECD PISA global education survey, Japan, Estonia, Finland and Canada are the 4 highest performing OECD countries.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3TCpzSe4cs
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wbl-PflEc0
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZjxkDA1s-c
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiczDPx96ac
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdMN8ioUYGc
www.nier.go.jp/kokusai/pisa/video/How_does_PISA_work_640x360.mp4
all4ed.org/debunking-seven-myths-about-pisa/
www.oecd.org/pisa/pisafaq/
www.oecd.org/pisa/data/

OECD PISA tests the skills and knowledge of 15 year-olds, providing the global benchmark for the quality, equity and efficiency of school systems.

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an internationally standardised assessment that was jointly developed by participating countries and administered to 15-year-olds in schools. The survey was implemented in 43 countries in the 1st assessment in 2000, in 41 countries in the 2nd assessment in 2003, in 57 countries in the 3rd assessment in 2006, 62 countries in the 4th assessment in 2009 and 65 countries in the 5th assessment in 2012 and 72 countries in 2015. Tests are typically administered to between 4 500 and 10 000 students in each country.
PISA assesses how far students near the end of compulsory education have acquired some of the knowledge and skills that are essential for full participation in society. In all cycles, the domains of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy are covered not merely in terms of mastery of the school curriculum, but in terms of important knowledge and skills needed in adult life.

Attached: Cy_HCqPXgAA8mqH.jpg large.jpg (1160x1910, 461K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gregashman.wordpress.com/2017/11/13/stop-going-on-about-finland/
youtube.com/watch?v=sIN6BKXJYLQ
youtube.com/watch?v=i4RGqzaNEtg
oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisa-participants.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

BRAVO ESTONIA

Attached: 1.jpg (1024x730, 102K)

>Finland and Estonia are the only white countries in the top 12

What's their secret?

Attached: 2.jpg (1024x730, 139K)

Attached: 3.jpg (1024x730, 172K)

Attached: 4.jpg (1024x730, 132K)

Attached: 5.jpg (1024x730, 129K)

Attached: 6.jpg (1024x730, 133K)

Attached: 7.jpg (1024x730, 121K)

Attached: 8.jpg (1024x730, 195K)

Attached: 9.jpg (1024x730, 82K)

Asian genes

Attached: 170px-Ogadai_Khan.jpg (170x200, 12K)

>Finland
gregashman.wordpress.com/2017/11/13/stop-going-on-about-finland/
youtube.com/watch?v=sIN6BKXJYLQ

Wtf is wrong with the DR?

meme ranking

too much reguetón

Mongoloid genes shared with Finland, good at school but can't create shit

i really doubt China uses the average from every student there, think they only select the best schools there to pretend they are doing great

Low number of shitskins.

it literally says that it's only for Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Guangdong

ok, but even for those cities it looks exaggerated, they are always leading those ranks and yet they don't create nothing in terms of technology, everything is a shit copy from the west

PISA is a meme. It's just results from developed countries compared to less developed lmao
You don't need PISA surveys for this. All the shit eastern european countries are below the OECD average because they're europoors with a shit education system.
Doesn't help when certain students or cities are selected for the survey; obviously with some ulterior motive.

Based Brazil

>t. seething 3rd worlder

not even joking
it has something to with their chink writing

>cities
Shanghai and Beijing each, have around the same population as the Nordic countries, Guangdong has more than 100 million people
>they are always leading those ranks
they don't? this is the first time Beijing, Jiangsu and Guangdong participated, and they are not even at the top nor "leading"
>yet they don't create nothing in terms of technology
PISA data is only representative for 15-year-olds in school, and anyways that's not what PISA measures

I am a first worlder. Rich people like me don't live like you filthy peasants

let's not enter Sapir-Whorf territory plz

Dominicans are the most dumbest latinos

Sure Pablo...

>What steps are taken to ensure the PISA tests and the results from it are robust?
>Confidence in the robustness of PISA is based on the rigour which is applied to all technical aspects of the survey design, implementation and analysis, not just on the nature of the statistical model, which has developed over time and will continue to do so. Specifically on test development, the robustness of the assessment lies in the rigour of the procedures used in item development, trialling, analysis, review and selection.
>The task for the experts developing the assessment is to ensure that all these aspects are taken into account, and to use their expert judgment to select a set of test items such that there is a sufficient balance across all these aspects. In PISA this is done by assessment specialists who work with advisory groups made up of international experts. Participating countries and economies also play a key role in this item selection process.
>The details of the test design and development processes will be available in the 2015 Technical Report to be published subsequently. The link will be posted here as soon as the report becomes available.

>Can students cheat on PISA?
>PISA is the world's foremost international, high-quality and high-impact education assessment programme and so it is vitally important that the PISA data are 100% accurate and authentic. Therefore the OECD applies very strict conditions at all levels to make sure student data is an accurate reflection of their ability and performance, and has not involved any form of cheating. This assurance starts with the Agreement for Participation between the OECD and each country. Article 4 of the agreement requires countries to comply with the comprehensive Technical Standards for PISA, including the secure management of test materials and secure administration of the assessment. These requirements are then reinforced through the PISA Operations Manual, the School Coordinators Manual and the Test Administrators Manual. These manuals have explicit instructions for the secure receipt, handling and storage of all test related materials, as well as for the secure administration of the test itself. No one other than approved project staff has access to secure PISA data and embargoed material and formal confidentiality arrangements are in place for all approved project staff.

>All the shit eastern european countries are below the OECD average because they're europoors with a shit education system
see the OP again

>dominican republic

Attached: 15065129798.png (310x670, 12K)

>Puerto Rico

Attached: 2015-08-02-21.17.11puertorico.png (481x594, 193K)

>Portugal ahead of Norway

Get fucked our bacalhau is the best too

BRAVO PORTUGAL!

Attached: portugal-2017-oecd-economic-survey-boosting-growth-and-wellbeing-24-1024.jpg (1024x768, 110K)

France btfo'd by austrian BVLL

isn't this the test where the cheaters known as Argentinians rank people from Buenos Aures and the rest country separartely?

Norwegians eat bacalhau too?

It's 2019. When are PISA 2018 results coming out?

Why is it always mongoloid countries that get in the top?

they didn't really "cheat", the OECD and friends set very high standards in order for results to be published, in 2015 Argentina (nor Kazakstan nor Malaysia) didn't meet them, so they weren't published and they were put on a separate database
There's data for CABA because there was a completly independent PISA assessment made there (thanks Macri!)

December 2019

China does the same shit. They'd be Africa tier if they included areas outside of the major city. How do you think some rural pig farmer would do?

estonians have the most number of start ups per 100k people

>China does the same shit.
they don't, PISA data (i.e. representative for 15-year-olds) for "China" (actually Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Guangdong) is fine

and again, they are not "cities" Guangdong has as many people as Mexico for fucks sake

Finnic people truly are something special, if only rest of the world minded their own business, settled for little and were resourceful like us, world would be a better place.

Beijing and Shanghai are cities though.

Growth in Points between 2009 and 2015 in Latinamerica

1° Peru
2° Colombia
3° Chile and Brazil

Attached: Prueba pisa002(2).jpg (929x972, 171K)

What requirements do countries need to be a part of this test? Like, some countries aren't present. Why is that?

they are "municipalities" a first-order administrative division of China, in 2015 Beijing had around 21 million people and Shanghai around 24 million, for comparison they could easily be at the top ten most populated *metro* areas in the world

SERCE-TERCE are a Latinamerican test.

Uruguay and Costa Rica have something to explain.

Attached: SERCE TERCE 2006 2013.png (411x501, 116K)

I guess provide reliable abd verifiable data i.e don't be a commie

>the Swiss are worse at reading than Portugese, worse than Russia, worse than the USA, worse than the OECD average
lmao

members of the PISA Governing Board (as of now OECD members + Brazil) have to be part of the assessment no matter what
for the rest of the world participation is voluntary, their ministry of education or equivalent has to send a letter to the OECD Secretariat first, then there are some examinations made in order to estimate if the respective national agencies are suitable to carry such a large assessment (this is because PISA standards are very high)

If a country is not present is basically because: they can't; they don't care; or they are already scheduled to take part in a future PISA assessment

see also youtube.com/watch?v=i4RGqzaNEtg
oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/pisa-participants.htm

Vietnam is #6 and is 3rd world, therefore everyone below it has 3rd world tier education.

remember that PISA data is only representative for 15-year-olds in school

Looks like a bright future for gooks then

the key word is "in school", but yeah, nevertheless bright future

Attached: pisa-science-2.png (1841x1642, 275K)