How do 1.3 billion people fit into such a small piece of land?

Half of India is in the tropics and has year-round growing seasons, the other half is subtropical. Also agriculture is heavily based on rice which yields multiple crops a year.

Gee, I wonder where all the muslims and hindu pee worhispper in India live that have 7 kids each

Attached: picture-5.png (1142x1132, 689K)

>There's an abundance of agricultural land.
Yep, if i am not mistaken, India has the biggest arable land in the world. They can easily support their population and export food.
The "muhhh world is over populated, lets stop breading" is just a meme perpetuated by people sharing space with niggers, while living in small cuck concrete boxes in the few mega cities around the world.
They should be put to death.

As far as i know, there is more muslims in the south than in the north (where the purge was more violent and the tension is tangible).

Interesting how China is not food self-sufficient although their actual population density outside urban areas isn't that huge.

Not true. There's 0 muslims in the North Western states. But most in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar stayed put. Today, they are the biggest states in India population wise and both are like 20% muslim.

Most of China is a fucking desert. But they are doing an excellent job changing the desert to arable land, and commercial forests.

Attached: 001aa0ba3c6a1966d4960e.jpg (900x528, 465K)

Western China can't support a large population. South west is mountainous and north west is a desert. Eastern China is where all the rivers and fertile land are.

Attached: China-Topography-Map.jpg (1500x1132, 320K)

I did not know that.

China's food security will grow in coming years and India's will decline. China has reached a phase in it's population development, that large American style farms with massive tractors are becoming the norm. India still has too many small time farmers and will be negatively impacted by global warming a lot more

China has a temperate climate, the growing seasons are as long as India's. Also significant amounts of land have been destroyed by pollution.

>global warming

Attached: d90.png (644x800, 15K)

>my grandparents farm in Punjab
>Canadian flag
of course.

No, most of where China's farmland is has an actual winter that requires a fallow period for plants.

Attached: Spatial-distribution-of-growing-season-length-in-China.jpg (850x595, 51K)

?
New world is full of emigrants from all places of world.
What did you expect? A native american?

Vs a map of land in use
Why yes, I am a pure blooded Punjabi Bvll

Attached: Map-Agricultural-Regions-China-1986.jpg (1084x1039, 117K)

>that large American style farms with massive tractors are becoming the norm
Which isn't true at all of course. Most farming in China has very little mechanization and relies on manual labor, which they have a nearly limitless supply of.

Attached: Local peasants grow herbal medicines in the mountain areas in Nyingchi Prefecture in southwest China (450x328, 45K)

The growing seasons _aren't_ as long as India's I meant. That was a typo.

Nop. To much changed in the last 5 years.
They are dumping tractors at a speed which almost every one will own one.

>small

I'm sure I could pull out a CCP press release from the 1950s which claimed same.

>actually taking commie press releases seriously

Kek, good point.
But China is literally changing. I was watching a documentary about the uyghur people, and China just send a battalion of farm soldiers (private soldiers that will cultivate the land, and take in guns if needed).
A simple cotton farm had top tier harvesters. Few years back, it was a pack of chinese picking while barefoot...

Instead of finding the 9 years old rape victim, you have to find the little girl who has never been raped

>he just now learned about commie cunts and their habit of setting up showpiece Potemkin villages to impress foreigners

Attached: 1544268801916.png (327x316, 208K)

India will always be a poor country do to the lack of good waterways

They can grow a lot of food, but they can't build cars cheaply, because there infra is fucked and no rivers to float cheaply.

Attached: Bildschirmfoto 2019-01-17 um 16.20.52.png (2222x788, 224K)

they love human heat.

M8, my observation come from the output of products in their exportation charts.
They don't triple their canvas production without triple their cotton production.

We have the same problem. Our rivers are not navigable, and the government refuses to even think in build channels (brazil is pretty much a flat country, believe or not) because they don't see the potential to transport large quantities of EVERYTHING.
Every year our roads turn into shit because we are the largest soy exporter, and most of it is grow in the middle of the continent, and transported to our 3 few ports by trucks (a caravan of them, days and days of trucks).

Pic related. The image of a third wold country explained why it's a fucking third world country.

We joke about it, even Hitler build railways to transport prisoners to die, and we can't do it to transport food.

Attached: fila-caminhoes-paranagua-2.jpg (510x320, 42K)

Nahhhh build a river is the most expensive infrastructure project one can do, the maintain coast are ridicules
China is more or less the only country that does that. Brazil has also a hugh problem with coasts. These cliffs and shallow bay look beautiful in postcards but you can't get your supertanker to land anywere.

Well i you wanna know more about geography impacting countrys i would lead you to either Peter zeihan "accidental superpower & absent superpower" or if you like a little bit less war and future projection -> Tim Marshall "Prisionar of geography"

Though i like Zeihan books more, because he goes far into the future and in the second book he talks about the wars likely playing out.
Argentinas eventual rise (because la plata has great geography) could eventually overshadow you in south America biggly

>India
>Small piece of land

Its not, though.

That's where you're wrong, Mehmet.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Dedicated_Freight_Corridor
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delhi–Mumbai_Industrial_Corridor_Project

> china geography
> chin chon pin pong

>Argentinas eventual rise (because la plata has great geography) could eventually overshadow you in south America biggly

Attached: GDPg_ARG.png (1151x605, 99K)

>small

I will look for those books.
The only problem with Argentina is their mentally handicapped politicians.

Lel

half of india is arid desert, savana (Thar, Marwar, Karakoram, Rann of Kutch, Himachal Pradesh), the other part is mountains

India has like 1 actual desert, dude

Attached: image001.jpg (672x587, 55K)

>Argentinas eventual rise (because la plata has great geography) could eventually overshadow you in south America biggly
The whole basis for him when he says that is "as long as they don't elect a pants on head retard" and that "Argentina is a great example of how politicians can destroy a country with potential, even if it takes them 90 years." Electing a promising politician might be ez pz for societies that have their shit figured out, but we have a long track record of not being able to produce such people... or those people getting fucked by the establishment.
We've elected tons of politicians on the basis of deep rooted change, but every time they fuck up, accidentally or intentionally.

which extends to arid steppes/savanas, which is more than half the entire cunt

Bruh, I've been to Punjab. Arid does not mean desert.

Attached: JGanter-Punjab_G3_2913.jpg (1000x667, 139K)

Still don't see reason to let Africa reach 2 billion niggers wanting Gibs in other places. I would sit comfortable in my farm in Brazil knowing that world population is just 500 million.

China anda India still are in the subsistence phase in many places. Specially in isolated Rural places in the countryside, that live just like 100 years ago. Brazil has a lot of agriculture potential because we actually use just around 7.4% of land to crops. Our protected area is 66.5% of the country. No place does that.

I think most of the overpopulation thingy is about supplying the same products/power to everybody. Copper for example; I think most developed euro cunts have like 50 kilos of copper per capita on infrastructure. There's literally not enough copper in all the know reserves of the world to give the same amount to China and India.
Then there's coal/oil for power, plastics and petrochemicals. And water, don't forget water. Unless you want the country with the biggest drinkable water reserves to give up some of it to the rest of the world :^)

the punjab is just as arid as the Monegros Desert or chihuahuan desert

t. punjabi owner of subways deli franchise

Are talking about the Cerrado? Because there's been a massive expansion in soy production there since 1990. Brazil is destined to become to fuel the next generation of obese cheap meat eaters with it's soy exports. If you talking about the amazon being protected, it's land isn't suitable for farming
economist.com/briefing/2010/08/26/the-miracle-of-the-cerrado

Attached: spaw_uploads_images_Cerrado05.jpg (400x247, 39K)

Brazilian can't build railroad because of the lobby of the automobile companies since the 50's, before our model was like everyone else, trains and trains. Since them, they are abandoned and any project to build more railroad is doomed at the Congress. I never have seen a passenger train or a metro. It's ridiculous. Super cargo ships need deep waters to Port? Our principal ports are at the Rock beaches of south and southeast, while the sand beachs of the Northeast have only 1 port of relevance.

>I think most of the overpopulation thingy is about supplying the same products/power to everybody. Copper for example; I think most developed euro cunts have like 50 kilos of copper per capita on infrastructure. There's literally not enough copper in all the know reserves of the world to give the same amount to China and India.

Of course there isn't and it's why neither cunt will ever reach First World status. Only a relatively small part of the world's population will. The rule of Darwinism is that "The fewer resources an organism uses, the more of them there can be."

Wait, so the Jungle Book is actually there in the coast? Always imagine was in the middle. If that forests still exist, anyway

Cut the world's population down to 1.5 billion max and everyone can have First World living standards.

No, if you sums up the national parks, indigenous reserves and the obrigatory reserve every farm owner is required to maintain, the protected area of Brazilian is 66.5% of the territory, according to studies from Embrapa Territorial and NASA mapping. So, people saying bullshit about us is bullshit. We are actually at the Vanguard of agroecology production. USA only protects 22% of their land for environment causes.

500 million according to neomalthusian studies. We should be trying to reach interstellar travel by now.

Damn. Well farm the cerrado over, the future is now

wtf i love shrinking birth rates now

Uh huh. Resources are finite and there is always some part of the world that will be rich and another part that isn't. In the Middle Ages, the Middle East and India were the richest part of the world and Europe was not so important. As the Age of Discovery progressed, Europe overtook them and never looked back. To sum it up, the result was a huge shift of global wealth away from the Middle East and towards Europe especially Northern Europe.

>tfw China can't develop their western country so they start colonizing the Canadian west coast

That is why dinosaurs went extinct and smaller, less resource-hungry reptiles like snakes and turtles survived.

There's plenty of forest in India. The Western Ghat and coast are hilly and receive a great amount of rainfall. Unlike the rest of the subcontinent, which is largely dependent on the monsoons, states like Kerala remain somewhat wet throughout the year.

If you travel across the Deccan Plateau and stay for some months, you'll see a grand variation in landscape between the monsoon and winter. Aurangabad--a Mughal-built city in Maharashtra--resembles a desert in the dry season. Once the rains come, everything turns green.

Today, the largest tracts of traditional forest, Himalayas aside, does exist in east-central India. There are plenty of wildlife and natural preserves between Madhya Pradesh, eastern Maharashtra (specifically Gadchiroli and Gondia districts), Chhattisgarh, Odisha, etc.

IME, the landscape of Madhya Pradesh and southern Chhattisgarh is probably what you'd think of if you imagined the jungle book. Both states have tigers, rugged hills and dramatic landscapes. However, the climate isn't akin to that of a tropical rain-forest.

The settings of Kipling's written 'Jungle Book' were a mountain range in Rajasthan and a forested tract of Madhya.

Here's a picture from Tirathgarh Falls in Chhattisgarh's Bastar district. I took it in the dry winter; during the monsoon, cliff is a roaring wall of water.

Attached: tgarh.jpg (768x960, 161K)

*Western Ghats, my bad.

Madhya Pradesh pic, since I'm posting anyway.

Attached: MP.jpg (960x613, 147K)

True. The cities are horrendously crowded and people are jammed in like sardines, but the countryside of China is fairly empty and has lots of open space.

That's because much of China is located atop a high-elevation plateau. Much of the country wasn't inhabited, with only a handful of large, planned cities rising up during industrialization.

India has plenty of open space, too, but is comparably well-suited for human habitation (like the Chinese coast).

Most Indian transportation, commercial or otherwise takes place on roadways. Commercial transportation has always majorly relied on trucks in India.
Waterways are seldom used for long distance traversing, unless it's trade routes via the sea. Only transportation occuring in rivers is small distance, like crossing from one bank to the other.
When people say that roadway infrastructure is bad in India, it isn't so much the connectivity between states and regions that they're talking about, all states are interconnected by a network of reliable state and national highways. What they're mainly referencing is the connectivity inside the regions themselves, particularly to isolated villages and rural areas. The roads to said areas are too small/bad quality for trucks to be driven on. However, that really isn't an issue because trucks are used for delivering to the trade centers, manufacturing units in the state and from there the goods are transported in smaller/lighter goods carriers (fun fact : most of these lightweight goods carriers would come from a German company called "Tempo" dunno if you've heard of it. Later these were replaced by domestically produced ones but because of nostalgia all light goods carriers are called "Tempos" even now).

So goods transportation is not an issue.
Main reason why India's growth is so slow despite its potential to grow so much quicker is primarily due to rampant corruption at all levels of governance as well as in the corporate sector and also the fact that most Indians are completely apathetic to corruption in general.
Almost every 3 or 4 months, a corruption scandal is printed in the news and some corrupt minister or CEO is exposed and arrested and people just react with a "meh" like it's a normal thing.

>be fat slug
>involved in numerous scandals
>accused of stealing millions in an illegal timber-harvesting scheme
>found and fund a paramilitary organization that was repeatedly accused of gross human rights abuse (mass murder, rape, razing of villages, kidnapping and forced resettlement)
>publicly advocate for violence

>get repeatedly elected
>political regime only ends when Maoists stab you to death

>five years later
>Rahul Gandhi mourns you as a "martyr"

Attached: 000_Del173170 --621x414.jpg (621x414, 46K)

And people say Brazil is bad. We both are, actually.

Never is a strong word, China's fertility rate has reached below replacement level if I'm not wrong, mainly due to the policy enacted by its government and subsequent modernization.
Meaning it's population will only decrease further.

In India, the fertility rate is stabilizing almost everywhere. Aside from a few notoriously shithole states (most of the images that are spammed on this board about pollution, filth, etc in India are from said states), most states are near replacement levels with many even reaching below replacement levels (Kerala has a fertility rate of 1.56, compare that with Japan which has a fertility rate of 1.5 and is projected to have a population crisis due to said fertility rate).
Meaning the population will soon stabilize here as well. The only threat to overpopulation globally as of now is Africa if current projections stay as is and they really do grow by such a huge margin.

The region might be generally dry but it still has plenty of forests, woods, jungles, etc.
The coasts are filled with forests while in other places they're scattered throughout hence the density doesn't seem as much.

Attached: heimkymepj-1516282518.png (1000x1046, 64K)

India is less dense than netherlands btw

Building a railway through a jungle is a little different than building it through the Polish plains and hill land. Convoy harvests aren't uncommon anywhere.

The bulk of the population lives in Uttar Pradesh - Bihar and Eastern side on the Ganges river.

Wouldn't want to live there. Feels great being from Kashmir.

This country needs a clean slate if it wants to redeem itself.
I always wish widespread anarchy would take place and all the fucking fat corrupt motherfuckers in office would be thrown out. All parties are corrupt and should be discarded and members of the parties would also be disposed of and the youth of the country would take it by the reigns and hopefully fix the mess and stagnation that decades of corruption had left behind.

But then again, these are just juvenile delusions that have no chance of ever coming true.

True. I guess the only plus point here is that there's no widespread violence like there is in many South and Central American countries.
Although if I'm not wrong it is restricted to certain regions, right? Like North Brazil is violent and chaotic while the South isn't so (correct me if I'm wrong please).

I'd unironically rather live in a Sub-Saharan village than alongside B*haris and Uttar Pradeshi faggots.

BASED

The best part is that Indian journalists and popular media continues to extol and brand men like Mahendra Karma as 'martyrs,' despite the evidence underlying accusations against them.

I had a big shock when i heard this. How can a land be so fertile?

Argentina has great geography - its a fact

They just got really really really stupid leaders, which are all related to each other for some reason

Poo

Good post. Southern peoples are looked down by your northeners because they are darker but south is absoulutely more civil than the north. I call for kara boğa.

Also half of the population growth will come from africa till 2050. It's crazy to think about! Europe will get only more african refugee crises. Poor italy...

And that's a good thing.
The KARA BOGA will rise again.

To the coast thing:
Could be an mistake on my hand, i had read a lot of books claiming Brazil has a hugh problems with good harbors, due to the coast beeing cliffs or super shallow sandsbanks.
But i guess a cliff is still better then a shallow sand beach.

The car lobby thing is really interesting.
I never heard about that before, whats the opinion of your new populist president on those lobbies ?

Is building trains on your rocky, or soggy jungle lands even possible. Is it very hilly or rocky in Brazil or rather flat ?

I did hear about these super long dirty roads full of trucks though.

Not really, they just kind of live in a different world. The language divide pretty much segregates India. And the people who do the shit talking from North India are likely from the NorthWest. Which is much more wealthy then the literal designated shitting street Heartlands of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh

Attached: 2000px-35_India_States_and_Union_Territories_GDP_per_capita_on_PPP_basis_in_2011.svg.png (2000x2203, 896K)

Uttar Pradesh/Bihar aren't north India, but central India.

North = Kashmir, Punjab, Himachal, Haryana and Uttarakhand

India is big as fuck.

Kind of. Everyplace is dangerous around capitals, while the countryside is calmer and people do street justice against criminals. I lived in the Amazon, for example. I was afraind more of stray bullets in executions than mugging. The south it is most developed part, thats why is safer and richer. But the capitals are full of crime like everyelse. Even the Rio de Janeiro state countryside is way safer than the city of Rio.

When India sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

Attached: gypsies.jpg (590x350, 76K)

Gypsies are from gujarat and north west frontier regions
They are hated in india too
There are few group's of gypsies living here in Hyderabad and they ALWAYS get into trouble

>politicians.
populus you mean