Why are they so similar?

Unironically there are more niggers that look like they just came out of africa in america than brazil

our percentage would rise to about 20% but even then it's still declining because abortions are legal here

>to roughly the percentage of blacks+hispanic.

hispanics count for about 30% of the US if not higher (in CA, TX and FL it's about 50-70%) when counting mutts, and spics do not mix with blacks because they hate each other

We're not
Brazilians are poorfag savages

we're not

>Brazil climate: tropical jungle
Amazon only.

Niggers, hispanics.
Same stuff

I don't think do. They are a rich and bit whiter version of Brazil in a different climate.

>Bolsonaro Signs Decree Making It Easier for Brazilians to Buy Guns
nytimes.com/2019/01/15/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-gun-rules.html

They are honorary Americans

Attached: 596985768.jpg (753x966, 137K)

But Mexicans and central americans are niggers, no difference.

American girl: hmm...not bad.
Blazillian girl: umm..decent

So they r same.

Both speak spanish.

Not so, outside of your country hispanics and blacks don't mix and the former are far easier to work with. Even the stupidest illiterate salvadorvian farmer is capable of caring for a garden or a car, blacks don't do that.

This much is obvious if you compare Guatemala or Honduras to Haiti or French Guinea.

kek

Brown people in our census can classify themselves as niggers, so central americans are niggers, same shit

>literal immigration nation
>easy to get a gun
>cops with Dirty Harry syndrome
>crazy president
>obsessed with own race

yes, same

Anyone in America can classify themselves as black because all of our ethnic data is self-reported rather than being gene-based. There's been multiple scandals involving white activists listing themselves as black. The only group that it can't be done with (in the US) are native americans, because in order to qualify for native heritage you have to be a card-carrying citizen of one of their tribes.

Despite this, Hispanics here don't classify themselves as black and never would. Before 1970 (when "latino" didn't exist on our census forms) most put themselves down as white or by their specific nationality, after 1970 it was hispanic/latino.

Also just because Brazil's brown people mixed with blacks doesn't mean anyone else did, this is something specific and unique about your country and Portuguese culture in general. Spanish people don't mix because they consider it dirty and black people to be subhuman, this is especially true for poor spics that have to compete with blacks for work.

>easy to get a gun
It's not easy by any stretch of imagination.

what you said applies to 95% of the planet except western europe and japan

Literally all spic colonies have negro DNA, Spanish didn't needed to import many because they are already full of natives.

Spain didn't import any because Spain's african colonies were all in Morocco where there aren't many blacks (and the few blacks that were there were either travelling merchants or slaves of the existing arab population). At any rate Spain didn't need to engage in the slave trade because Spain already enslaved all the local people.

Anyway you're now arguing marginal %ages of phenotypes when you were previously arguing that hispanics and blacks were exactly the same, you've already lost the debate.

Even Chile has negro DNA, so brown people and niggers are the same.

Attached: ncomms7472-f4.jpg (685x537, 51K)

>3% black in a 97% european/native society

meanwhile your country is anywhere from 60-70% black, these two cases aren't comparable because there's over a 200% difference between Hispanic-black composition and Luso-black composition. If you had a brain you'd realize that 70% is a larger number than 3%.

>being this desesperate

Brown people are niggers, it doesn't matter how do you consider yourself different.

>Spain didn't import any

Spain was the second biggest slave importer, just behind Portugal. The Caribbean was one of the two main destinations for slaves in the Americas. To this day there's a fair share of blacks and mulattoes in the former Spanish colonies in the Caribbean (Cuba, Colombia, Venezuela, etc.)

Attached: mapa-afro-colombiana.jpg (775x581, 90K)

The whole Southern Cone has negro DNA

If all brown people were black then no distinctions would be made as is the case here , you don't even understand the data you're working with monkey.

The Caribbean was only a single part of Spain's empire, and what happened there generally does not apply to the rest of the Americas because their economies were so different. This relates to another difference between the US and Brazil: America's economy is not export based like yours is.

So we wuz kangz? nice

brazil is unironically the downgraded "what if it went wrong" usa version

t. dual citizenship knower

What are you trying to say? Mexicans and Centroamericans aren't any less mutts than we are

Cuz they are mutts

The US has sightly more niggers tho.

American education, everyone. I know more of USA biomes than you know anything about Araucaria forest or Caatinga semi arid.

Attached: FB_IMG_1547817232060.jpg (920x510, 53K)

Yes they are, because Mexicans and Cetracas are not black. Now you're arguing against your own data which says exactly this.

Just how stupid are you?

exactly, we are part BLACK don't compare us with low t beaners

I didn't post any data. You are refering to another poster. Anyway, don't you know they are mostly hispano-indigenous mestizos?

theu both melting pots. We are like that too except that we don't have asians

Look at this Chicano subhuman so desperate to whitewash himself.

Attached: 1545959289622.png (1980x1036, 98K)

it's interesting. I was reading articles on slavery of both colombia and Venezuela. it seems like 500k salaves were introduced in Venezuela and about 150k here (Venezuela has a larger caribbean coastline than we do) they spread to Ecuador, Peru and venezuela. , while about 80k stayed here. They somehow managed to breed their way into 5 milkion blacks that we have today. In venezuela they miscegenated hardly, while here they actually isolated themselves on the pacific coast, while those on the caribbean coast miscegenated with whites and natives

Brazil is to us what the US is to the UK. Same thing except made massive, violent and retarded. Portugal is already a somewhat retarded place, so Brazil didn't have much of a chance.

Really mixed ppl.

Oh that's precious, the fucking japanese talking about being obsessed with race

I think he means in the U.S. Are you saying its not easy to get a gun in America?

They both score some black though and it is actually quite high in places like Honduras. Mexicans from the south and eastern coast also average like 4-5% sub saharan african, especially the states of Veracruz and guerrero

Brazilians monkeys always imitate every retarded shit ameriburgers do. Both are rude and stupid as fuck too.

They are the same thing

In Venezuela they miscegenated strongly is what I wanted to convey here, not hardly.Basicallyhere in in Colombia, about 20% of the popultion is afro-descendant to some degree (Black, Mulatto, Trirracial, Quadroon), but only half of them self identify as black. In Venezuela about 35% is afrodescendant (Black, Mulatto, Trirracial, Quadroon), but somehow only 4% of them self-identify as black

Here's the literature I read:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Colombians
es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrocolombiano
es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrovenezolano
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Venezuelan

axe-cali.tripod.com/cepac/hispafrocol/3.htm
colombiaaprende.edu.co/html/etnias/1604/articles-88185_archivo.pdf

Wikipedia is not literature, its not a serious source neither

Btw, for Brazil he percentage is as high as 50%

Yes it is cause everything there needs to be cited by an academic or official source. People re expected to read the references in each article as well

And for the US, I'll throw wild estimate of 20%, but I could be wrong cause the self-identified as black are 13% of the population

dios mio

Attached: muttmayor.jpg (2714x1533, 249K)

50% its not necessarily black, its pardo(mixed).

Exactly. I meant Black, Mulatto, Trirracial, Quadroon. Brazilians who self-identify as black like 8% of the population.

Due to the obvious social stigma associated with it, trirracials and quadroons a lot of the time tend to not self-identify as Black, but rather as Pardo, or even Mestizo. That's also the reason why you see places like Cuba (65%) or Puerto scoring excessively white in census results. Cuba, for example is in reality like 30% White according to The University of Miami's Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies, but the census says it is 60-something%. Also, the genetic states is mostly from Cuban-American who for themost part are predominntly European. In fact if I'm not mistaken, the term white flight was born from whites leaving Cuba in droves, not from current
whites fleeing black hoods in the US

worldpopulationreview.com/countries/cuba-population/
latinamericanstudies.org/cuba/racial-demographics.pdf

>states
tests*

Colombian education

Brazilians always look to be like USA, they're obsessed.

I know that happens at hispanoamerica, but its quite the opposity at lusoamerica, pardos tends to identify youserlf as blacks.

In research papers you cannot cite Wikipedia, but you can use the references cited in each article as bibliography. The articles in Wikipedia are just a mishmash of them , so, considering that int is not an official research paper, instead of copying link by link, I took the easier route and just copied the Wikipedia article. Literally nothing wrong with that. Also, only literal autists find Wikipedia unreliable

Not really. He didn't changed anything relevant.

Wtf are you talking about? Hispanics are violent as fuck.
Not much different than niggers

>but its quite the opposity at lusoamerica
Considering that only 8% of Brazilians self-identify as black, I assume what you say is not true. It's actually a phenomenon that occurs both in the Hispanosphere and Lusosphere, but it is just not exclusive to us cause it happens in the Anglosphere as well

Only kids in school cite wikipedia man, get real

Actually, at my school you cannot cite Wikipedia in essays or papers in general but Jow Forums is not an academic environment, so linking Wikipedia does the trick just fine and gets the point across. Get real

Not everyone is a useless NEET with nothing better to do.
No one will ever post academic treatises in a fucking imageboard

So you are underage

not lying, m8

just look what i posted about the genetics of the brazilian population and you will see.

you re overestimating the black influence. the real brazil its not the cultural products that we sell as brazil. we are not resume to rio de janeiro and bahia and their carnival/samba/etc

lmao, what a bunch of delusionates.

I just came back from spending october-december in America and the US isn't very different from Brazil, except if you compare the favelas or the poor northeast, then obviously the US is going to be way better. But only 3% of Brazil lives in favelas, so...

Pic is what a typical poor neighborhood in Brazil looks like. One of these days some american posted California's street view and it was just the same, kek

Attached: RK.jpg (1917x747, 459K)

school, as in uni, dude pls

Attached: 07977756.jpg (224x225, 10K)

>Pic is what a typical poor neighborhood in Brazil looks like

user...

MapCrunch Brazil 10 times and post your results. I'll wait.

First pic I posted was in the state of Rio, more specifically some small ass city called Miguel Pereira.

Attached: MapCrunch.jpg (1919x847, 569K)