Political compass

Dumb yuropoors. This is what freedom looks like.

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Attached: Schermata 2018-06-26 alle 01.41.57.png (555x469, 63K)

None of those election maps are accurate though. There isn't a single yuropoor politician outside of the far left portion of the green or red squares.

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

I did it again changing the opposite the answers on sex and religion.
Not much changed

Attached: Schermata 2018-06-26 alle 02.04.52.png (480x387, 18K)

Attached: 1446744557284.png (800x500, 430K)

> business & finance

DESU, sounds like you might be a centrist in absolute terms. Keep in mind that the far left is extreme communism and the far right is extreme corporate dictatorship.

where would Jow Forumsshareholdernation be?

Who else /radical accelerationist crypto-monarachist/ here?

Attached: 1502333282242.jpg (710x823, 90K)

>government decides to give one dollar to the poor
>"FUCKIN' COMMIES STEALING MR. SHEKELBERG'S HARD EARNED MONEY"
>americuck detected

nam

name me

Attached: Screenshot_20180626-092545.png (1080x1920, 151K)

>Disgusting commies shitting up this board
Shame on you, faggots

Attached: 1523847723382.jpg (960x963, 647K)

Attached: Untitled2.png (469x503, 14K)

Radical centrist

DESU this is me

too many communists on this board.
crypto isn't for you.

I'm not a commie, nowhere close. I just don't want kikes, boomers, and mega corporations to own everything. Step up

If you're not in the rightmost side of the purple square, you deserve the gas

Attached: file.png (480x400, 12K)

>tfw too smart to take stupid compass tests to appease gay OP and his buttbuddies

Attached: The_Morning_Kumite.png (733x464, 125K)

White girls fuck dogs

Attached: boomer tier.png (480x400, 17K)

>he thinks people actually take the test and not simply modify the URL to put their dot wherever

Attached: apu kassinen.jpg (973x660, 100K)

that weird boring guy who sits in the corner

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Attached: I need resynchronization.png (427x395, 12K)

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Close

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

far right isn't extreme corporate dictatorship; the more left-wing things are, the more prime for authoritarian rule they are
authoritarianism can come in the form of a government, a corporation, or any mix between the two
in the u.s. right now, we have a corporatocracy; if not for big government collecting taxes and deciding who gets what, this entity wouldn't have had a means of existing in the first place
enable individuals to become powerful and to operate in the way that they find best suits them while not treading on others' liberty, and you'll have the greatest nation in the world
srry dead tired or would give a better explanation, see pic related for a similar rundown
just, uuuh, ignore the snarkiness at the end there

Attached: boomer economy.png (1350x712, 143K)

Attached: pol.png (569x481, 19K)

Got to say though, a lot of the questions I didn't really knew the answer to mostly because they ask an opinion of something which should be considered from factual points of view, such as ''is homosexuality natural''? Idk that..

Get fuck'd libbycunt

Attached: 1525276709670.gif (800x371, 193K)

This, rights of the indvidual are paramount. And that means individual responsibility as well.

I've given serious thought to creating a new country free from communist green-square yuropoors, kikes, and niggers.

How much would such an enterprise cost, and where would be the ideal location? I know Jow Forums has already given some thought to this.

Attached: soy wars.gif (800x371, 103K)

Attached: 6-18-18.jpg (511x458, 39K)

and over time

Attached: Polital compass over time.jpg (422x731, 90K)

I'm surprised at this. Most of my views are that of Hitler's.

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Attached: Real Political Spectrum.png (1920x520, 16K)

Name me

Attached: 7CAE0C86-3DBF-43A6-BA95-BCA39A047F5E.jpg (534x528, 189K)

Some type of yuro, but not full commie like a kraut or a Swede. Maybe Nordic, Eastern yuropistani, or Swiss.

>A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.

Impossible to not strongly agree, but that doesnt mean the one-party system is superior. A lot of leading questions like this.

Attached: hmm.png (480x400, 17K)

>almost nobody is an authoritarian or muh white ethnostate totally not dictatorship based utopia
Actually pleasantly surprised

>Impossible to not strongly agree
This answer follows the false assumption that "progress" is always a good thing. Stalin created a lot of "progress" that could have been avoided in a democratic system.

As such, I wasn't sure whether to slightly agree or disagree with that question. Sometimes an authoritarian government is useful to reset a manipulated society, but other times it can be used to create a 1984-thought crime dystopia. I finally went with "slightly disagree".

Purple is white ethnostate, Muhammad.

you're all a bunch of filthy commies

Attached: 2018-06-26-135644_427x367_scrot.png (427x367, 10K)

>white ethnostate
>non authoritarian libertarian
pick exactly one, an ethnostate is literally impossible to establish without central planning on the scale of a dictatorship.

and i made fun of lefties all my life. fuck. is this shit rigged?

Attached: 20180626_075917.jpg (1080x1407, 256K)

Hitler was the greatest man to walk the face of the earth.

I'm not sure why I'm so far left, maybe I have a streak of Strasser in me or something.

Attached: pauls chart.png (480x400, 17K)

Border control isn't authoritarian though as it imposes no restrictions on the populace of the country. A white ethnostate can therefore be created via strong nationalism and resistance tailored to shitskin immigration.

Some pretty poorly worded questions in there

Attached: chart.png (480x400, 17K)

You'd need to enforce the nationalism somehow.
If people are free to disagree even if it's unpopular then over time the protections keeping it an ethnostate will erode.

>a white ethnostate can be created by limiting immigration
Ah yes, and do tell my man how you're going to get rid of all the niggers and spics who outnumber whites and are living here legally. Gee, it's almost like the only way to do that would be to establish a military dictatorship and then proceed to do truly abhorrent things.

This.

How do you think America devolved?

Nationalism doesn't need to be legally enforced. As seen in the U.S., it has thrived for 242 years on a strictly voluntary basis. We only stopped being a white ethnostate after sufficient government perversion created the 1965 immigration act.

However, such steps could be taken making such government subversion illegal.

How’s this?

Attached: ACE09E5E-43F8-4FF4-AF2C-BEB06816BCA6.png (480x400, 17K)

Calling me far right, yeaahh... no.

Attached: chart copy.png (480x400, 17K)

>nationalists
>"fucking sjws YOU WILL NOT TAKE MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RIGHT TO DISAGREE"
>the very same nationalists
>"in the end the only way we will be able to create the aryan pure utopia will be by curtailing any dissent against us. freedom ain't free, but it's for a good cause!"
I've seen this shit before and people expressing that type of doublethink baffles me.

>killing niggers and spics
>abhorrent
In any case, you would create a new country without these problems and make sure they can never happen in the first place.

I don't believe we can get to a libertarian utopia with out harsh authoritarian temporary rule setting up an ethnostate and and deporting the non-whites and useless eaters.
Either that or a race war, but a race war will result in a purge within the government anyway, or the collapse of government

I never said the sjw's can't take my free speech. You can strawman all you want though. Any healthy nation must accept hierarchies; free speech is a difficult issue inside of a fascist state.

It doesn't need to be fully enforced by force of law, just by social standards. The only thing I actually want government to control is media

Libertarianism cannot work in a multi-cultural society.
At the very least legally enforced segregation would need to be reinstated, and we would need a intelligence apparatus preventing another 1960's with the full force of lethal force

You just contradicted yourself in that post. You say nationalism doesn't need to be legally enforced and yet follow up by saying legal action is needed to prevent the government from changing it's mind. That's being authoritarian. Also the US was being invaded by germans, irish, and chinks for plenty of that timespan and even though you might think the first two groups are white today they definitely didn't count in the past. Which is another thing to consider since these sort of things change overtime.

I'm not saying it's a good thing I'm saying that if you want it done you essentially need to use the government to enforce it otherwise it won't last. You cannot have a libertarian ethnostate unless there are literally no other peoples that can migrate in.

>create a new country
Oh wew lad, that's a great pipe dream. Please tell me more about how one day the white revolution will take over in the northwest or whatever the embarrassing meme is. Even assuming a revolution could get going, your dumb as fuck if you think the military dictatorship running it would give up control and say "yeah senpai, we're going to return to democracy and the allowance of free speech now". A state like you describe would constantly be on the hunt against internal people who disagree with the policies in place and would likely end up continually killing them off.
>free speech is a difficult issue inside of a fascist state
It's an impossible issue. Human nature would inevitable lead to those in power in said state clamping down hard and turning it into a miserable clusterfuck like the USSR or Nazi Germany

It only ends 2 ways, Ethnostatists take over America intact, de-citizenise non whites a la Operation Wetback I/II, and deport them en masse, killing those who resist.

Or America balkanizes anyway, they cut out a nice chunk of it, any chunk with a nuclear arsenal really, grow military power, and use warfare to reclaim the former US, killing alot more "people" than they can kick out

>Libertarianism cannot work in a multi-cultural society.
You have any actual reasoning behind that?
>At the very least legally enforced segregation would need to be reinstated, and we would need a intelligence apparatus preventing another 1960's with the full force of lethal force
I'm going to go with my gut and say that this is bait.
I know. I wasn't actually addressing any of the posters ITT with that but rather something I've seen happen again and again with authoritarian favoring people I've spoken with.

The problem is you thinking they care about hypocrisy. They have a set of goals and will back anything to achieve it, even if it contradicts what they said before. Luckily it's more like "larp anything" than "do anything" in reality.

Nazi Germany was a paradise. Strasser had a pretty good take on free speech, but I have my doubts that you have read up on fascism at all.

Strasser basically said that anonymity should be taken from the journalists, but they could say whatever they wanted. There would just be social consequences.

Personally, I don't think it's a big issue. Once jews are killed or removed a lot of big problems today won't really be debated anymore.

Wrong yuropoor. Nationalism is a belief held by the people and has nothing to due with whether the government can import 12 trillion shitskins. Making a law saying (((they)) can't import the entirety of Africa is not authoritarian, and if anything is anti-authoritarian because now you won't be ruled by spearchuckers.

>movement and entire motive behind the revolution is to outright kill enormous sums of people and any who oppose the ideology
Because this sure as fuck has gone well in literally every prior example in history. I wonder how many commies who were part of the vanguard got dragged kicking and screaming to the wall because after they served their purpose the people in power came to see them as a threat.

This revolution you describe would sure as shit do the same to you guys in the end. It's human nature.

So what? Disgusting individualists are always so obsessed if they would die. What about the nation? I would gladly die for my people.

>literally every prior example in history
Nazi Germany worked out pretty well. After they got rid of the kikes like you, there was a utopia.

>Nazi Germany was a paradise
Protestors routinely jailed and killed, the media entirely controlled and cucked by the state, anyone who disagrees with party ideology (but more importantly the Great Leader figure) jailed, punished or shot. It was quite a bit more than social consequences.

>once x group is removed everything will be fine
Once x group is removed the leaders would create a new internal group that needs to be removed in order to sustain the entire social system of a dictatorship.

I honestly can't believe I'm debating this grade school shit with unironic facists on Jow Forums of all places, but then I guess chainlink did bring in a lot of clueless Jow Forums users.

>it was a utopia
Say that enough times and I'm sure it will become true eventually. Just like how the USSR was a perfect utopia of socialists living in perfect harmony with no social ills, no starvation, and no dissent!

>You have any actual reasoning behind that?

Multi-cultural societies always devolve into conflict, Yugoslavia is the biggest example, despite the Yugoslav's attempting to develop a unified yugo culture in a multi-ethnic state, they failed absolutely.

Yugoslavia stayed together because it was a moderate left authoritarian system.

You see it in waves in conflicts all over the world - Syria - ISIS Arab's killing Yazidi's, Kurds, and non-Sunni's

Iraq - how it exploded into violence following the takedown of Saddam's regime - Sunni's killing Shiites in the streets much more than attempting to kill American's.

Monocultural societies are the most successful long term, minorities are never satiated, they will always consider themselves less than or otherwise chip on shoulder. The whole minority mentality is a historical recipe for war and genocide, which has repeated time and time again throughout history.

You cannot reasonably think that the US, with 1 million H1B's flooding in a year from China and India, Nig refugees flooding in from Horn of Africa, and tens of millions of illegal immigrants is going to hold together do you?
The only thing keeping the shit together right the fuck now is the expansion of the police state and that's being fought at every turn by the libertarian left and right, as well as the Authoritarian left - because they want a police state in their image with their idealogy that they control

Media deserved to be controlled and communist jewish protestors deserved everything they got.

>muh x group meme

Ok, jews were a random minority chosen, removing them totally created a market supply for another x group. Lmao.

Become a neoliberal already, stop messing around.

"Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them."

>I would gladly die for my people
You wouldn't die for your people, you would end up dying because the ruling party you helped put in power came to be afraid of you and viewed you as a threat to said grip on power. This shit has been shown to be true with virtually every single violent revolution in history yet mongs like you continue to lap up the propaganda and end up slaving and dying for {{{their}}} interests.

Keep telling yourself it'll never happen to you, one day you might have the luck of getting to join the tens of millions of others like you who died once they had outlived their usefullness.

Commies aren't right authoritarians.
The right is primarily concerned with destroying the left intelligentsia (which is fucking huge in the USA) and other political enemies on the left, from there on it will be race traitors and unwelcome minorities

fucking commies
This test is bullshit either way, the very first question is retarded

Attached: received_2074556976092548.jpg (1080x1794, 133K)

FACT: you CANNOT believe crypto is a revolutionary technology if you aren't in the purple square

Attached: 1491246259760.png (793x794, 273K)

The protestors weren't on the right. The entire political right wing and almost all of the centrists aligned with Nazification.
So again the Nazi's were removing their political enemies of import.

>the media entirely controlled and cucked by the state
I believe that open media we so tout has long ago been subverted by internationalist and leftist financial interests. I would have a government exercising strict regulation on the Media. I believe suppression of the media to be moral in dire circumstances

Nice try Marxist. Now post your PolitiScales results.

Attached: download.png (800x1200, 229K)

And yet somehow for the past 200 years the US has managed to continue with a fair amount of success even though the population if a giant salad bowl of people who hate each others guts.

I'm not even talking different races, I'm talking about people from different European countries who loathed each other and yet were able to get along even with their different cultures.

>media deserve to be controlled because da joos did this and that
That's great and all, but unfortunately it wouldn't have let up after the Jews were gone either. As long as the state existed, the media would have basically been required to toe the party line and never speak out against anything.
>Ok, jews were a random minority chosen, removing them totally created a market supply for another x group. Lmao.
It's like you either didn't read or didn't have the reading comprehension to understand what you read. Dictatorships thrive on internal enemies. Once one enemy is gone another gets made up to fill the role. All this has happened before and will happen again.
that's a great and fancy way of saying
>I have no rebuttal to anything you said so I'm just gonna call you a cuck and joo

I'm not going to be able to keep debating with you since I have work in the morning, but I sincerely hope you are larping and don't actually think that passing laws to prevent non-nationalist actions isn't an authoritarian act.

Nazi Germany was one of the most Corporatist states to have ever existed. Most of the platform was economic, and those economics favored eliminating foreign and Jewish interest, deregulation, and freeing the market in many ways.

Every leftist there ever was opposed it, and the Nazi's shot them, end of story

>dude lmao it's just the left we want to kill off and those allied with them

Again, it's funny how in revolutions and military dictatorships through history the public enemy group usually would end up growing to have this nebulous and mysterious definition.

If you don't think in the end the excuse of "they're a leftits jewish commie nignog sympathiser" won't be used to kill off people who become politically inconvinent or who {{{those}}} in charge view as threats your fools who are ignoring history.