What's her endgame?

What's her endgame?

youtube.com/watch?v=8uZt-uLNhOA

Attached: 1547840245750.jpg (914x545, 147K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/culture/story/20160713-michael-landy-the-man-who-destroyed-all-his-belongings
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

mad how you can make a career out of telling people to clean their rooms

>Making money out of over-consumerist first-world problems
The ones who came up with the idea have to be geniuses desu

is this jordan peterson for women?

Attached: b87.png (756x400, 95K)

I fucking love all the butthurt she's causing in roasties and consumerists

Is she?

Her books were a huge hit in EU well before the show.

wut?
why the butthurt?

Who?

who?

Discarding useless trash aka roasties

WITH NO SURVIVORS

Attached: 1545599339071.jpg (801x876, 244K)

Go grab more money from stupid American!!
Nice.

Juden Peterstein is a charlatan that sells new age Freudian bullshit to Millennial liberals and keeps them away from real nationalism and Christianity.

Attached: juden peterstein.png (315x502, 174K)

Becoming Jordan Peterson's assistant professor.

I keep seeing articles and twitter posts of buttmad roasties and consumerists because she says not to have useless books and things

I used to be pro-book but now I just loan them from the library.

Puh-lease call me when she actually wages a war against consumerism like this Japanese queen. That's the problem with people like her and Peterson. They manage symptoms instead of trying to cure the disease.

Attached: image.jpg (500x670, 38K)

I'm about to blow your mind.

Attached: image.jpg (850x400, 49K)

I usually give away, loan, or sell books after i read them. The only ones I keep around are strat guides and my personal Tolkien collection.

lmao
An asian telling the average mom to do menial things, instead of some sjw telling them to be empowered, and she is trending

In Finland all the SJW roasties loved her books.

well she is not so covertly anti-capitalist

Jordan Peterson is a center right "philosopher" who is only popular because he's the only person over 40 who can speak to the under 40 crowd without disgust. He has some mishmash philosophical and advice ideas that aren't particularly profound. He rejects cultural marxism sounding like Mr Rogers rather than Jow Forums. His blandness is literally his appeal. The cleaning room thing appeals to millennial because he's actually appealing to them and willing to tell them why it's a good idea without being moralizing or demanding it.

Also he sort of looks like Bill Nye without him being what Bill Nye became.

The eternal anglo had made art out of this a decade ago.

bbc.com/culture/story/20160713-michael-landy-the-man-who-destroyed-all-his-belongings

>cultural marxism
Lmao he's on a one man crusade against post modernism while being one himself. The biggest irony of ironies was when he attacked Zizek a continental modernist materialist philosopher, who actually writes philosophical dissertations, by accusing him of being a post modernist. The man is worse than charlatan, he's an idiot.

>ad hominem
>appeal to authority
>ad hominem
Why are you so mad at him that you can't even formulate valid criticism?

>Why are you so mad at him that you can't even formulate valid criticism?
I can do that. He is empirically wrong, does not keep track of the details of his arguments, and is, at the end of the day, a jungian.

The criticism is valid. Peterson rails against post modernism even though his line of thinking is framed along its tenants. He also clearly doesn't understand it if he accuses someone who is clearly not a post modernist of being one for political reasons.

>against post modernism
How can you be against facts, there's a wide consense about this, we are not living in modern times, nobody claimed this post popper and kuhn, can you provide serious sources?

Post Modernism is a philosophy, not your bullshit Marxist linear history garbage.

if i spread my ass cheeks part and push really hard, gold might come out

thats my philosophy

>im such a brainlet i never read hegel: the post

I was asking politely for sources on authors refuting both popper and kuhn man, I think it's interesting, I'm not attacking you man

>1,43 m
imagine

Attached: 1421015101560.jpg (829x589, 92K)