Why don't the poor rise up against the rich in your country?

We kind of do, but Macaron doesn't care.

poor people are ugly, smelly, and boorish

Income in a generation is a function of an underlying general factor of social competence as well as a random component. Those in the lower decile of income are there because on average they have lower ability than the population mean. Social mobility is by nature a slow process due to the high heritability of social competence and the highly assortative nature of human mate selection. Partial indicators like income give a poor estimate of actual social mobility under conventional analysis. In order to achieve robust estimates you must look at an entire extended family for many generations, using several indicators of underlying social competence: in this way the error term can be minimized.

If you look at specific lineages in China before and after the revolution, you will find that those overrepresented in high status groups before the revolution are still overrepresented today.

Attached: IMG_8399.png (442x341, 182K)

No

We do.

i do not trust that graph at all though
It is also completely ignoring the impact of the welfare state.
You think Sweden would be at the top if the state did not intentionally impoverish the rural white middle classes, and massively transfer their money to immigrants ?

>DKP
>relevant in any way in German politics

Give me one good reason why we shouldn't gas poor people.

Might be a correlation, not causation

>intentionally impoverish the rural white middle classes,

Nobody in Sweden is impoverished. You know absolutely nothing.

It's the cause, because non-white non-east asians are very, very, very stupid.

Because there are more of us than you bourgeois bitch.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 60K)

Attached: tinfoil fedora.jpg (1600x1347, 360K)

>Give me one good reason why we shouldn't gas poor people.
If there are no poor people, then who are we going to steal from by paying them wages?

Because the young generations are much better off than their parents here so we don't have this boomer issue, boomers are actually the poorer ones as they weren't allowed to accumulate wealth in communism so they must be supported by their children since their pensions are really small and they are too old to rebel.

Well, they are. The average American negro has an IQ of 85.

More like:
>Post-Cold War Communist Parties
>Relevant in anyway except maybe in Greece

He's right though. The state steals from us like crazy.

Ever heard the concept of "miss to win" ? Welfare money did not grow on trees. Because they were doing ok, and are still doing ok, does not mean they were not stolen from. If left free, they'd be doing great. So yes, impoverished. Besides you are off topic.

No. What he's saying is false. I study economics and Sweden's economy is the best in Europe.

This is completely correct. Without the burden of all of the migrants, we'd be much better off. That, and there are a lot of other tax problems in this country.

You are a ridiculous fool.

This

Honestly if you're not an idiot all it takes is one generation, and if you are an idiot you don't deserve a mean income. I have a friend who's the son of a self-employed back alley car mechanic and a perpetual welfare queen, and he sat his ass down to study, was a student trainee at BMW and is now an engineer at Continental (those with the tires and other automotive technology).

IQ isn't a perfect measurement. It's useful, but everyone since the inception of psychometrics has said that it's not flawless and that not everything that one might deduce from it is necessarily true.
The amount of the total US population that would theoretically be functionally retarded if black intelligence was exactly as it is claimed is much higher than the actual prevalence of mental retardation in the US.
Most """research""" positing purely hereditarian hypotheses for the relationship between race and intelligence seems to conveniently come from white nationalist or white supremacist sources. There's a lot of higher-quality, reliable research on the subject that yields much more complex results, but I wouldn't expect """white nationalists""" and their ilk to compromise their narrative.
archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/stop-talking-about-race-and-iq-take-it-from-someone-who-did.html

>Welfare money did not grow on trees

Welfare money is distributed tax income. It's the basis on Nordic Social Democracy. All Nordic countries have this and it existed before immigrants existed.

no shit

Where is Russia and Ukraine?

>You are a ridiculous fool.

Facts don't care about your feelings

Attached: Europe2020b.jpg (333x394, 37K)

Anything more than 2.5 should just be considered "unlikely".

It's a meaningless stat.

im upper class
genuinely despise povvos
besides that we have all of you wined around our fingers, you wont do shit

>povvos
so you're Australian?

nah but i like the word povvo,you feral bogan

they are

Attached: bélier.webm (202x360, 1.36M)

Attached: 1547896419690.jpg (637x612, 87K)

slave mentality

Attached: 1547896504693.png (1946x1592, 375K)

Yikes.

Hi 19th century religion discord

Attached: derugy-pay-and-productivity-chart-v1.png (1170x762, 372K)

Lmao

Marxists believe this

>mfw

Attached: memed-io-output.png (707x898, 750K)

>Heritage Foundation

lmao the middle ages had more social mobility than contemporary europe

decades of right-wing propaganda and nonexistent class consciousness

>source that me no like mean facts wrong!
The original wage v productivity graph is dishonest manipulation of data that uses different inflation indexes and uses only cash wages instead of all compensation, the graph I posted points that out opaquely.

>Better call for backup on the discord we got a porky in the thread

Yikes really making it obvious now

>Better call for backup on the discord we got a porky in the thread
*tips tinfoil*

cringe

Not really tinfoil when it's a known fact they exist and shill here

It's much more tinfoil to believe in a 19th centiry philosophy based on your personal failure and feneralizing that to some grand economic religion wherein successful people are evil and competition doesn't exist

fuck poor people. in the west it is a choice to be poor, they can all get fucked

>everyone I don’t like is part of a conspiracy to attack me

Didn't expect Australia to be so dire. How does Denmark do it? Even Finland, a country that usually does well in these metrics, needs 3 generations.

Because they think they are rich too

The poorest in our country are PoC. That's why.

This makes no sense. 3 generations? It takes 0 generations in Norway. You only need to go to school and finish it. You don't even need to go to college, and you can have the mean average income, and most go to college anyway, so they are certain to get the mean average income.

BS map from a BS filled finn.

Strawman much? Go back to your Jow Forumsconservative discord