>FrAnCe sUrREnDeRs aLL WaRs iT eVeR FiGhTs
FrAnCe sUrREnDeRs aLL WaRs iT eVeR FiGhTs
What about most battles won per battle?
Fake news
Napoleon is statistically the most successful military commander in human history
>De FRpropagandan
you are welcome france
He wasn't Italian
you're welcome :)
>uk-england
He wasnt human
>who is Genghis
objectively false beyond words but ok
ever heard of khalid bin walid? alexander? genghis? timur?
hate finns
damn we badass yo
Sorry but he's right. Italy has a less successful military history than even modern Greece. There's no way you could have produced the finest military mind to ever have existed.
The truth is that Corsicans are sufficiently distant from Italians for Napoleon to not be called Italian.
its counts battles won by the kingdom of england, before the union was formed
Thanks bro.
North Italy is honorary french, just like west Germany.
What a load of bull. The majority of these countries didn't even exist 400 years ago. I'm fairly sure that the Mongols under Khan had more than 250 successful battles under their wing.
How many battles did Alexander fight in? He's remembered because he's the first of the greats and that's it.
Literally all of these countries existed 400 years ago, America excluded. Unless you're autistic and counting the Ottoman Empire as Turkey triggers you.
He gave you a king
>england gets to count all scottish, welsh and northern irish victories too.
here you go philistines
>
>
>
have you been snorting frogshit or what?
well england is the big boy of this union, battles won by the uk hardly count as scot/welsh/ni victories
What about a list of most battles lost?
except that napoleon wasn't even corsician
his family was from mainland
The Danes would top that list
All talented Italians go to France, where they can truly use their potential,
Imagine being proud of being the national equivalent of a shopping mall
Napoleon wasn't ethnically Italian either way. His ancestor from the Buonaparte line, Francesco di Buonaparte, was nicknamed “The Moor of Sarzana” because of his dark complexion. He probably came from North Africa, hence Napoleon's haplogroup(e1b);
What? How does that make France a shopping mall?
Wasn't Finland's greatest national figure, Mannerheim, a German/Swede?
>scot with a chip on his shoulder
shocking
>french institutions exist to serve foreigners instead of bettering the natives
you are an idiot and an honorary american for your mentally ill spouts of pride
his family came during the 17th centuary, a german shepherd has more german blood
he's right tho
half of everything brits boast about came from scotland
If Spain would have been in WW1 and WW2 it would be in top 3 at least
>rome
>flag of italy
opinion discarded
his family came to Sweden during the 1600's and since then had their german blood watered out, so he was pretty much almost fully Swedish.
lol finntard btfo. get tf outta here slit eyed slope head aka 'finn'.
Butthurt bong
finally I can feel like a warlet.
Why are Anglos and French such insufferable warmongerers? Do they have to compensate their inferiority? In speciall France I always thought they are people that don't suffer massive inferiority complexes like anglos.
Oh no, I was refering, to Da Vinci, Mazarin and the like, who where already adults when they came to France, not smelly immigrants
Both the French, Germans and Anglos are pretty much the same. All three are warmongering lunatics.
Most of the wars are prolly against Brits
what the fuck are you on about
none of them are Frances achievements
Why is France soooooo powerful, lads?
>Why are Anglos and French such insufferable warmongerers
*starts two world wars*
You're all three warmongers, you should just hug it out. All of you love to start wars and you arr rook same.
t. invaded Russia
All these battles that we won were waged in self-defence. Poland never attacked anybody first.
>Rome
>259 battles
No we are far behind on murder in OP.
You can't compare their bloodthirst to us humble, friendly people
This video was cringe.
It included the Kingdom of the Franks pre-843 in French history.
Also it's pretty much cherrypicked. Look at how little China has and how much the USA have.
This video does nothing to help the military reputation of France and it just looks like WE claims instead
>No Mongolia or anything related to it
ok this is very accurate and true
Stop coping you bloodthirsty barbarian!
Do you seriously think China has more military victories than us.
>bloodthirsty barbarian
[citation needed]
In thousands of years of history over a mere 250?
That makes sense, yes
>gives rome the italian flag
HAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA
>In thousands of years of history over a mere 250?
They are a peaceful people. Yeah imagine there are people not constantly trying to murder comfy and nice dudes.
Yeah you don't have this in your rough violent warcult of a country.
How does my country have a war cult?
then get btfo
>They are a peaceful people. Yeah imagine there are people not constantly trying to murder comfy and nice dudes.
Poland had so many battles not because we are warmongers or war-loving people but because our country is placed in central position on European plain so all armies going west-east, and north-south were going through us. Yet few centuries ago Poles were more focused on north-south (Sweden-Turkey) direction than on west-east (Germany-Russia), because Germany was weak and divided into many mini-state-cities, and Russia was weak enough for us to ask ourselves a question: "should we end its existence or not?".
>They are a peaceful people
by having the third largest territory,
do you know how much war they had with xiongnu turk and all kinds of nomad?
maybe you shouldnt have claimed the swedish throne, polepoo?
Poland should be an island, just like the UK. Then we would be the happiest people on Earth. Neighbours always attack us and hurt us without single rational reason.
What counts as a battle there? I don't believe US has had the time to win that many actual battles, they must have counted every tiny skirmish in Afghanistan and Iraq to get that number
This mongol is so happy as if he raped 1000 little German girls.
you know he got more pussy in three month than our whole life
We did ok for our size.
Yeah sure and Tesla was a croat
That's stupid because now 10 american soldiers killing a couple of afghani terrorist is listed as battle while we only know the major battles from the past
The point is that Corsicans aren't exactly Italians, just as Channel Islanders aren't exactly French and so on. Italy itself is made up of several ethnic groups and the fact that they all came to be known as "Italians" is a fortuity of history. Some of the regional languages in Italy aren't even in the same language families; Genoese is in the Gallo-Romance group, like French, Venetian is Italo-Western, standard Italian is Italo-Dalmatian(a subgroup of the former) and Sardinian is in a family of its own.
enjoy your ban by putinbot
imagine bragging about winning battles instead of wars
spit on this pathetic flag
If you bother to check his family tree half his greatgrandparents had German names. It was pretty common for Swedes to invite foreign settlement to Finland, mainly Germans, Brits and Huguenots.
>ust as Channel Islanders aren't exactly French
they are though?
>Napoleon is statistically the most successful military commander in human history
Excuse me?
Don't worry, they have you beat in total number of wars too
They're not. Just as Walloons aren't French and Luxembourgers aren't German.
Ethnicity is a very complex thing, and Corsicans are pretty distinct from Italians even if they're ultimately part of the Italian cultural sphere. Either way I don't think Italians can claim Napoleon, because his ascent to the imperial throne of France was only made possible by French ideals of meritocracy and wouldn't have happened if Corsica was still part of Genoa.
That would be Subutai.
>Subutai (Classical Mongolian: Sübügätäi or Sübü'ätäi; Tuvan: Cүбэдэй; Modern Mongolian: Cүбээдэй, Sübedei; Chinese: 速不台 1175–1248) was an Uriankhai general, and the primary military strategist of Genghis Khan and Ögedei Khan. He directed more than 20 campaigns in which he conquered 32 nations and won 65 pitched battles, during which he conquered or overran more territory than any other commander in history.[1] He gained victory by means of imaginative and sophisticated strategies and routinely coordinated movements of armies that were hundreds of kilometers away from each other. He is also remembered for devising the campaign that destroyed the armies of Hungary and Poland within two days of each other, by forces over 500 kilometers apart. By any metric, he is one of the most successful commanders in history.
heh... nothign personnel kid *teleports navy behind you*
but not the important ones. forever will have a military that is joked about and for good reason. amen.
to be fair we started our own world wars too, they're just not called world wars because we didn't lose them
Mannerheim first and foremost was Russian officer and patriot of Russian Empire
Is it typical for Russians to fuck Kirghiz lads(about 16 yo) in the asshole?
>ctrl + f
>no Suvorov
Niggas a u serios? Dude fight in 90 battles, 65 of them was major one and he never lost any.
Thats is Swedis tradition as far as i know
Honestly, Britain never fought its own wars. Most of your wars were won on German, Russian and French blood. I hope you don't think anyone outside of the English-speaking world takes your military seriously, because you never had one.