There are unironic monarchists on this board

A president is elected and knows from the get-go that he has a limited amount of time in office so he usually tends to occupy himself with raiding the country for his personal financial gain.
A monarch knows that he is in office for life and has no reason to raid the country because as opposed to the president who stores all his wealth in Swiss banks, the country IS the monarchs wealth and he, like every human, wants to improve his own wealth. That means investing in the country instead of raiding it.

>crown
to the contrary, pickelhaube

Attached: tfw_10_million_dead.gif (270x300, 86K)

In heaven there is monarchy, in hell there is democracy.

Behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me.

Attached: King of Kings.jpg (600x800, 73K)

Given the choice I would get rid of the monarchy, but it is nicer having a head of state that is ceremonial rather than some fucking politician like other countries have, I dislike the queens privilege but she seems like a nice person, and they royal family are entertaining, that being said i'd get rid of them in a heartbeat

Attached: lx7bhe4s6uy01.jpg (964x822, 119K)

the most able should rule. not the one who people like the most

The problem with treating the people of your country like property is that they'll eventually revolt when you raise taxes by 300% for the third time this month because your mistress wanted a new jewel that cost 900 trillions.

The truth is that it's very possible that the king will just want to enjoy his life instead of making the life of it's subjects better

The most able is a point of view

meritocratic monarchy is the most based system

>when you raise taxes by 300% for the third time this month because your mistress wanted a new jewel that cost 900 trillions
People who try to argue against monarchism always say "Well a monarch can just bust your door down and fuck your wife" or "A monarch will just take all of your money and buy a pet monkey with it", all of this is just blatant exaggeration. When western countries teach about monarchism they always tell kids that all monarchs are tyrants and evil but that couldn't be more wrong. Schools dote on the 5 or 6 bad monarchs that have existed yet totally ignore the millions of good ones. 99.5% of monarchs turn out to be decent or good rulers because they're taught from birth not only how to rule but how to rule justly.

Meritocratic Monarchical Technocracy is the future.

>When western countries teach about monarchism they always tell kids that all monarchs are tyrants and evil but that couldn't be more wrong.
No, this is 100% correct. The king claimed to rule by the willl of God. That's why they were tyrants, they were lying. God never choose them to rule.
>99.5% of monarchs turn out to be decent
Actualy, the vast majority of them were just puppets of smarter subjects. This not good or decent, just useless.
>because they're taught from birth not only how to rule but how to rule justly.
They were taught how to rule. This is true, but they were never taught how to rule justly. Hence the thousands of wars of sucession that murdered millions

>The king claimed to rule by the willl of God. That's why they were tyrants, they were lying. God never choose them to rule.
You are not God so assuming He didn't chose the king to rule is tyranny and slander.
>They were taught how to rule. This is true, but they were never taught how to rule justly. Hence the thousands of wars of sucession that murdered millions
That is your opinion and it is unsubstantiated in fact.

>man
I'll have you know that my sovereign is a Queen, good sir - and a damn fine one at that!

I'm a republican though

>tfw we worship inbred Germans

Attached: wojakblanket.png (633x758, 696K)

>You are not God so assuming He didn't chose the king to rule is tyranny and slander.

No, the Hue is actually right on this one. The idea of a divine right to rule in the west is based on scripture. Specifically, it is based on the part of the scripture in which God grants Adam dominion over all things on this earth. Thus, the only ruler that can legitimately claim divine mandate is the Heir of Adam, someone whose identity (barring a sudden and direct intervention from God himself) is completely unknown.

Thus, any and all monarchs claiming a divine right to rule are illegitimate and therefore Tyrants.

I don't worship them but at the end of the day it is their country and always has been and they haven't given me any good reason to try and change that

Why fix something that isn't broken, having a president instead of a queen wont change my life in anyway whatsoever

>tradition and history
>current head's only claim to the monarchy is because Napoleon literally gave it away to the dude's great grandpa
>wasn't even Swedish
based retard

>That is your opinion and it is unsubstantiated in fact.
I already mentioned the sucession wars.
>You are not God so assuming He didn't chose the king to rule is tyranny and slander.
This must be bait

Have you seen our president?

Attached: zemond.jpg (520x347, 39K)