Why can't westerners learn that socialism always leads to Venezuela and Russia?
The Free Market has raised the living standards of the world since industrialization.
Why can't westerners learn that socialism always leads to Venezuela and Russia?
The Free Market has raised the living standards of the world since industrialization.
Other urls found in this thread:
foxnews.com
twitter.com
Because my liberal arts professor told me america bad
America is not a free market tho
Imagine getting paid to feminize and indoctrinate soy boys in expensive private American colleges?
I bet they teach Art History and Esperanto for their Liberal Art degrees.
Lmaoo... socialism is a dead ideology. It's just gaining support in the US. Western europe is turning less and less socialist
>Russia
my man they haven't been gommies in nearly 3 decades
>venezuela
>70% of enterprise is private
>resource-based market economy with some kind of welfare
>socialist
Man oh man.
I am obviously referring to Soviet Union Stalinism, not modern Russia.
Most Russians live better off under Putin than under Communism.
North Korea, China, Vietnam, all examples of flawed Marxist states.
History classes were some of my favorite though. Anthropology was where the sjw stuff was really apparent
China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
Them calling themselves socialist really confuses me
>I am obviously referring to Soviet Union Stalinism, not modern Russia.
My mistake. I autistically thought you meant russia instead of ussr because you mentioned Venezuela which is in the news.
the dprk is in a league of its own, its technically a dynastic necrocracy with marxist elements
socialism can work, just not on a national basis
>Most Russians live better off under Putin than under Communism.
Yeah, when government cuts the welfare and increases taxes - that's when people live better, huh?
Also, when people wear similar clothes, not because they're the only kind avalible, but because the only kind affordable - that's also a sign of classy life, huh?
>soviet union stalinism
You clearly have no idea about stalinist economy, its improvements over pre-soviet economy and about the spread of cooperative enterprise in USSR, that used to cover the sectors state couldn't cover, such as consumer goods.
*cough*
socialist hellhole coming thru
Oh yeah those bread lines were all examples of a healthy state.
Everyone in Russia was poor, and three families used to live in one commie-block apartment.
Without a free market, corruption and greed, inherent human qualities ruin any utopian Marxist ideology that the state pretends to follow.
aren't most cunts mixed market economies? US and China included.
Sweden is an example of what happens when a large country with almost no people in Europe gets to run things.
America needs to lose 60% of its population, especially the lazy brown ones, to reach a Swedish-tier level.
Do you also get confused when North Korea calls itself a democratic republic?
What makes Sweden socialist? You have one of the most freest market economy. Don't feed this meme
if you need more buns just double the recipe, Walter
That Soviet Eagle flag looks kinda cool Tbh
do you understand what social democracy means
Social Democracy is just capitalism with a big safety net.
The economic is still controlled by private free companies.
Not socialism. And as far as I know Sweden has been loosening regulations and privatizing state property in the recent years.
This is true. Many southern european countries are far more socialist than northern european countries. Why is that they are never made as an example socialism success I wonder
Yes. Why can't they be honest...
Socialism is a Marxist fairy tale that always lead to bloodshed and authoritarianism.
>You clearly have no idea about stalinist economy, its improvements over pre-soviet economy
because my wife's bull doesn't agree with that
How many chances she has to become president of the US?
Welfare is a marxist disease which encourages laziness and hurts the economy for everyone because 1% of fatasses don't want to work and everyone has to pay for their welfare
The current state of anthropology is really sad. Physical anthropology has been shrinking as a discipline for a long time and cultural anthropology abhors the rigorous, reductive analytical frameworks that typify all serious scientific enterprise.
She won't be old enough to run for president until 2024.
>speaking of stalinist economy
>muh bread lines
You have no idea of soviet economy's history and changes either.
>Everyone was poor
Not really, nah.
>three families in one apartment
Again, check it in comparison with previous regime, when people used to live in barracks with no heating.
I'm not saying that soviet economy on each of its stages was perfect and that it has to be brought back. I say that it was a huge improvement over previous stage and that soviet system was in certain aspects much better than current one.
>marxist utopia
Just try Engels bruh. Then you won't be writing dumb stuff like that
>free market virtues
That's demagougery
Why is she so popular? She seems dumb even in leftists terms.
>interned in the immigration office of Ted Kennedy during college
Literally no country has been socialist since in literally no country have the workers own the means of production which is the backbone of said ideology.
>b-b-but they call themselves socialist
Yes and North Korea is democratic republic, right?
>b-b-but nordic countries
Big private sectors are now socialism?
>b-b-but state owns businesses
Congrats there is thing called state capitalism.
It's because American men have been socialized to betray their race and sleep with brown women.
>encourages lazyness
Lazyness can't be measured, that's an empty assumption.
>hurts the economy
Yeah, because keynesean model was so much of a disaster for USA
Socialism doesn't lead to Venezuela and Russia, retards tell that to even bigger retards and and they all together screech it.
The reason Venezuela is failing is because nearly the entire world has embargoed it. The world is so globalized that every single country relies on trade, regardless of their economic setup. When the entire world embargoes a country in the current day it is bound to fail regardless of whether it's socialist, communist, or capitalist. If the entire world decided to embargo the United States we would also fail despite being as capitalistic as we are.
Great, so right on time when Bernie finishes his second term.
TheFinnishBolshevik, is that you?
:^)
Free market will always degenerate into plutocracy like what see in USA today
first term'
Venezuela failed because crude was their only meaningful source of revenue to fund their exorbitant social spending and international prices collapsed
>no arguments but memes
Who?
>North Korea, China, Vietnam, all examples of flawed Marxist states.
Imagine being this fucking retarded. There is a fine difference between the ruling party of a country being one ideology and the actual policies of said country following an ideology.
China is run by the Communist Party but they actually practice mixed market capitalism.
North Korea is run by the Communist/Kim Party but they actually run on Jucheist principles.
Vietnam is run by the Communist Party but, like China, practices mixed market capitalism.
Communism in the world today does not exist. Countries that are run by their respective "Communist Party" in practice follow restricted capitalism because even they know that communism does not work, yet they still LARP.
A finnish left youtuber
I recognize you from KC
Wtf is KC?
When you hear the words "Ted Kennedy" and "immigration" used in the same sentence, turn around and run as fast as you can.
You're not white.
Thanks to Stalin, people barely even had anything to eat and agricultural output at his death was less than it had been in 1914.